Suppr超能文献

HLA-B27 基因多态性与全球强直性脊柱炎易感性的关联:一项荟萃分析。

Association of HLA-B27 genetic polymorphisms with ankylosing spondylitis susceptibility worldwide: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University , 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, Anhui , China.

出版信息

Mod Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;24(1):150-61. doi: 10.3109/14397595.2013.852856.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Many publications have evaluated the correlation between HLA-B27 polymorphisms and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), with conflicting results. We carried out this new meta-analysis in order to collect all the relevant studies to further clarify the association of HLA-B27 polymorphisms with AS susceptibility.

METHODS

Relevant published data were retrieved through Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database on disc. The statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager Version 5.0 and STATA 11.0. From these data, the odds ratio (OR) with a 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was calculated.

RESULTS

(1) A total of 38 studies, including 3,410 AS cases and 1,735 healthy controls, were collected in this meta-analysis. (2) Our results showed that B2704 was a risk factor but B2703, B2706, B2707, B2727, B2729, and B2747 may be protective factors for AS worldwide. (3) These subtypes, such as B2701, B2702, B2705, B2708-15, B2717-20, B2723-24, B2733, B2735, B2740, B2746, B2749, and B2767, showed no association with susceptibility to AS. There was a huge difference with previous reports for B2702 and B2705. (4) The B2702, B2704 and B2705 subtypes have existed high heterogeneity but no publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis in our study suggested that B2704 might be a potential risk factor, however, B2703, B2706, and B2707 might be potential protective factors of AS, especially in Asia.

摘要

目的

许多出版物评估了 HLA-B27 多态性与强直性脊柱炎(AS)之间的相关性,结果存在冲突。我们进行了这项新的荟萃分析,以收集所有相关研究,以进一步阐明 HLA-B27 多态性与 AS 易感性的关系。

方法

通过 Medline、PubMed、Web of Science、CNKI 和中国生物医学文献数据库光盘检索相关已发表数据。使用 Review Manager Version 5.0 和 STATA 11.0 进行统计分析。从这些数据中,计算了比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(95%CI)。

结果

(1)这项荟萃分析共纳入 38 项研究,包括 3410 例 AS 病例和 1735 例健康对照。(2)我们的结果表明,B2704 是一个危险因素,但 B2703、B2706、B2707、B2727、B2729 和 B2747 可能是全球 AS 的保护因素。(3)这些亚型,如 B2701、B2702、B2705、B2708-15、B2717-20、B2723-24、B2733、B2735、B2740、B2746、B2749 和 B2767,与 AS 易感性无关。B2702 和 B2705 与之前的报告有很大差异。(4)B2702、B2704 和 B2705 亚型存在高度异质性,但无发表偏倚。

结论

本研究荟萃分析表明,B2704 可能是一个潜在的危险因素,然而,B2703、B2706 和 B2707 可能是 AS 的潜在保护因素,尤其是在亚洲。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验