Channa R, Sophie R, Khwaja A A, Do D V, Hafiz G, Nguyen Q D, Campochiaro P A
The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eye (Lond). 2014 Mar;28(3):269-78. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.245. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
To identify factors associated with visual outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with ranibizumab (RBZ) in the Ranibizumab for Edema of the mAcula in Diabetes-Protocol 2 (READ-2) Study.
Optical coherence tomography scans, fundus photographs, and fluorescein angiograms (FAs) were graded and along with baseline characteristics were correlated with month (M) 24 visual outcome of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/100 (poor outcome) vs >20/100 (better outcome).
Of 101 patients with a M20 visit or beyond, 27 (27%) had BCVA ≤20/100. Comparison of patients with or without poor outcome showed mean baseline BCVA of 16.8 letters (20/125) in the former compared with 30.4 letters (20/63; P<0.001). Mean change in BCVA between baseline and M24 was -2.6 letters in the poor outcome group compared with +9.8 letters (P<0.001). Foveal thickness (FTH) at M24 was 374.1 μm in the poor outcome group compared with 268.8 μm (P<0.01), a difference driven by 14 patients with mean FTH of 450.3 μm. Foveal atrophy occurred in 65% (11/17) in the poor outcome group compared with 17%(12/71, P=0.001). Persistent edema was noted in 52% (14/27) of patients with poor outcome. Laser scars near foveal center were significantly more common in patients with poor outcome who did not have edema vs those who did (78% (7/9) vs 23% (3/13) P=0.03).
Poor baseline BCVA (≤20/125) in DME patients predicts poor visual outcome (≤20/100) after 2 years of treatment with RBZ and/or focal/grid laser, often due to foveal atrophy and/or persistent edema.
在糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者接受雷珠单抗(RBZ)治疗的糖尿病性黄斑水肿研究-2(READ-2)中,确定与视觉预后相关的因素。
对光学相干断层扫描、眼底照片和荧光素血管造影(FA)进行分级,并将其与基线特征与第24个月最佳矫正视力(BCVA)≤20/100(预后差)与>20/100(预后较好)的视觉预后进行关联分析。
在101例有第20个月或更晚随访的患者中,27例(27%)的BCVA≤20/100。对预后差和预后好的患者进行比较,前者的平均基线BCVA为16.8个字母(20/125),而后者为30.4个字母(20/63;P<0.001)。预后差的组在基线至第24个月期间BCVA的平均变化为-2.6个字母,而预后好的组为+9.8个字母(P<0.001)。预后差的组在第24个月时的黄斑中心凹厚度(FTH)为374.1μm,而预后好的组为268.8μm(P<0.01),这种差异由14例平均FTH为450.3μm的患者所驱动。预后差的组中有65%(11/17)发生了黄斑萎缩,而预后好的组为17%(12/71,P=0.001)。预后差的患者中有52%(14/27)存在持续性水肿。在没有水肿的预后差的患者中,黄斑中心凹附近的激光瘢痕明显比有水肿的患者更常见(78%(7/9)对23%(3/13),P=0.03)。
DME患者基线BCVA差(≤20/125)预示着在接受RBZ和/或局部/格栅样激光治疗2年后视觉预后差(≤20/100),这通常是由于黄斑萎缩和/或持续性水肿所致。