Suppr超能文献

雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的视力预后影响因素

Factors affecting visual outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with ranibizumab.

作者信息

Channa R, Sophie R, Khwaja A A, Do D V, Hafiz G, Nguyen Q D, Campochiaro P A

机构信息

The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2014 Mar;28(3):269-78. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.245. Epub 2013 Nov 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify factors associated with visual outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with ranibizumab (RBZ) in the Ranibizumab for Edema of the mAcula in Diabetes-Protocol 2 (READ-2) Study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Optical coherence tomography scans, fundus photographs, and fluorescein angiograms (FAs) were graded and along with baseline characteristics were correlated with month (M) 24 visual outcome of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤20/100 (poor outcome) vs >20/100 (better outcome).

RESULTS

Of 101 patients with a M20 visit or beyond, 27 (27%) had BCVA ≤20/100. Comparison of patients with or without poor outcome showed mean baseline BCVA of 16.8 letters (20/125) in the former compared with 30.4 letters (20/63; P<0.001). Mean change in BCVA between baseline and M24 was -2.6 letters in the poor outcome group compared with +9.8 letters (P<0.001). Foveal thickness (FTH) at M24 was 374.1 μm in the poor outcome group compared with 268.8 μm (P<0.01), a difference driven by 14 patients with mean FTH of 450.3 μm. Foveal atrophy occurred in 65% (11/17) in the poor outcome group compared with 17%(12/71, P=0.001). Persistent edema was noted in 52% (14/27) of patients with poor outcome. Laser scars near foveal center were significantly more common in patients with poor outcome who did not have edema vs those who did (78% (7/9) vs 23% (3/13) P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Poor baseline BCVA (≤20/125) in DME patients predicts poor visual outcome (≤20/100) after 2 years of treatment with RBZ and/or focal/grid laser, often due to foveal atrophy and/or persistent edema.

摘要

目的

在糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者接受雷珠单抗(RBZ)治疗的糖尿病性黄斑水肿研究-2(READ-2)中,确定与视觉预后相关的因素。

患者与方法

对光学相干断层扫描、眼底照片和荧光素血管造影(FA)进行分级,并将其与基线特征与第24个月最佳矫正视力(BCVA)≤20/100(预后差)与>20/100(预后较好)的视觉预后进行关联分析。

结果

在101例有第20个月或更晚随访的患者中,27例(27%)的BCVA≤20/100。对预后差和预后好的患者进行比较,前者的平均基线BCVA为16.8个字母(20/125),而后者为30.4个字母(20/63;P<0.001)。预后差的组在基线至第24个月期间BCVA的平均变化为-2.6个字母,而预后好的组为+9.8个字母(P<0.001)。预后差的组在第24个月时的黄斑中心凹厚度(FTH)为374.1μm,而预后好的组为268.8μm(P<0.01),这种差异由14例平均FTH为450.3μm的患者所驱动。预后差的组中有65%(11/17)发生了黄斑萎缩,而预后好的组为17%(12/71,P=0.001)。预后差的患者中有52%(14/27)存在持续性水肿。在没有水肿的预后差的患者中,黄斑中心凹附近的激光瘢痕明显比有水肿的患者更常见(78%(7/9)对23%(3/13),P=0.03)。

结论

DME患者基线BCVA差(≤20/125)预示着在接受RBZ和/或局部/格栅样激光治疗2年后视觉预后差(≤20/100),这通常是由于黄斑萎缩和/或持续性水肿所致。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验