Department of Gynecology.
Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24 Suppl 10:x16-21. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt463.
A new paradigm for the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer has recently been proposed which helps to explain persistent problems in describing the development and diverse morphology of these neoplasms. The paradigm incorporates recent advances in our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of epithelial 'ovarian' cancer with new insights into the origin of these tumors. Correlated clinicopathologic and molecular genetic studies led to the development of a dualistic model that divides all the various histologic types of epithelial ovarian carcinomas into two broad categories designated 'type I' and 'type II'. The prototypic type I tumor is low-grade serous carcinoma and the prototypic type II tumor is high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs). As the serous tumors comprise ∼70% of all epithelial ovarian tumors and account for the majority of deaths, the serous tumors will be the subject of this review. There are marked differences between the low-grade and high-grade serous tumors. Briefly, the former are indolent, present in stage I (tumor confined to the ovary) and develop from well-established precursors, so-called 'atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors,' which are characterized by specific mutations, including KRAS, BRAF and ERBB2; they are relatively genetically stable. In contrast, HGSCs are aggressive, present in the advanced stage, and develop from intraepithelial carcinomas in the fallopian tube. They harbor TP53 mutations in over 95% of cases, but rarely harbor the mutations detected in the low-grade serous tumors. At the time of diagnosis they demonstrate marked chromosomal aberrations but over the course of the disease these changes remain relatively stable. Along with the recent advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of these tumors, studies have demonstrated that the long sought for precursor of ovarian HGSC appears to develop from an occult intraepithelial carcinoma in the fimbrial region of the fallopian tube designated 'serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC)' and involves the ovary secondarily. Another possible mechanism for the development of ''ovarian'' HGSC is implantation of normal fimbrial epithelium on the denuded ovarian surface at the site of rupture when ovulation occurs. We speculate that this tubal epithelium can result in the formation of a cortical inclusion cyst (CICs) that can then undergo malignant transformation. Thus, serous tumors may develop from inclusion cysts, as has been previously proposed, but by a process of implantation of tubal (müllerian-type) tissue rather than by a process of metaplasia from ovarian surface epithelium (OSE, mesothelial). The dualistic model serves as a framework for studying ovarian cancer and can assist investigators in organizing this complex group of neoplasms. In conjunction with the recognition that the majority of 'ovarian' carcinomas originate outside the ovary, this model also facilitates the development of new and novel approaches to prevention, screening and treatment of this devastating disease.
最近提出了一种卵巢癌发病机制的新范式,这有助于解释在描述这些肿瘤的发生和多种形态方面持续存在的问题。该范式结合了我们对上皮性“卵巢”癌分子发病机制的最新理解,以及对这些肿瘤起源的新认识。相关的临床病理和分子遗传学研究导致了一个二元模型的发展,该模型将所有上皮性卵巢癌的各种组织学类型分为两类,分别称为“Ⅰ型”和“Ⅱ型”。典型的Ⅰ型肿瘤是低级别浆液性癌,典型的Ⅱ型肿瘤是高级别浆液性癌(HGSCs)。由于浆液性肿瘤约占所有上皮性卵巢肿瘤的 70%,并导致大多数死亡,因此浆液性肿瘤将成为本综述的主题。低级别和高级别浆液性肿瘤之间存在显著差异。简而言之,前者是惰性的,处于Ⅰ期(肿瘤局限于卵巢),并由已确立的前体发展而来,即所谓的“非典型性增生(交界性)肿瘤”,其特征是存在特定的突变,包括 KRAS、BRAF 和 ERBB2;它们的遗传相对稳定。相比之下,HGSCs 具有侵袭性,处于晚期,并由输卵管内的上皮内癌发展而来。它们在超过 95%的病例中携带 TP53 突变,但很少携带低级别浆液性肿瘤中检测到的突变。在诊断时,它们表现出明显的染色体异常,但在疾病过程中,这些变化相对稳定。随着对这些肿瘤分子发病机制的理解的最新进展,研究表明,长期以来一直被寻求的卵巢 HGSC 前体似乎是由输卵管伞部的隐匿性上皮内癌(称为“输卵管上皮内癌(STIC)”)发展而来,其次是卵巢。卵巢 HGSC 发展的另一种可能机制是在排卵时破裂时,正常输卵管伞部上皮被植入裸露的卵巢表面,形成皮质包涵囊肿(CIC),然后发生恶性转化。因此,浆液性肿瘤可能像以前提出的那样,由包涵囊肿发展而来,但通过植入输卵管(米勒型)组织的过程,而不是通过卵巢表面上皮(OSE,间皮)的化生过程。二元模型可作为研究卵巢癌的框架,并有助于研究人员组织这组复杂的肿瘤。结合认识到大多数“卵巢”癌起源于卵巢外,该模型还促进了预防、筛查和治疗这种毁灭性疾病的新方法和新方法的发展。