Suppr超能文献

**目的**:评估在因心血管疾病住院的患者中使用安非他酮戒烟的效果。 **设计**:系统综述和荟萃分析。 **地点**:PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库和万方数据库。 **入选标准**:随机对照试验,比较安非他酮与安慰剂或不干预在因心血管疾病住院的患者中戒烟的效果。 **数据提取**:主要结果为戒烟率。次要结果包括持续戒烟率、复吸率、药物不良反应发生率和因不良反应停药率。 **数据合成**:采用随机效应模型计算比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。 **结果**:共纳入 10 项随机对照试验,包括 7457 名患者。与安慰剂或不干预相比,安非他酮显著提高了戒烟率(OR 1.52,95%CI 1.32-1.74,I²=88%)和持续戒烟率(OR 1.47,95%CI 1.24-1.74,I²=94%)。安非他酮组和安慰剂组的复吸率(OR 1.04,95%CI 0.81-1.33,I²=72%)和药物不良反应发生率(OR 1.14,95%CI 0.89-1.48,I²=62%)差异无统计学意义,但安非他酮组因不良反应停药率显著高于安慰剂组(OR 1.60,95%CI 1.10-2.32,I²=71%)。 **结论**:安非他酮可能是一种有效的戒烟辅助药物,尤其适用于因心血管疾病住院的患者。但需要注意的是,安非他酮的不良反应发生率较高,可能会影响患者的用药依从性。

Bupropion for smoking cessation in patients hospitalized with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Divisions of Cardiology and Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2013 Dec;29(12):1704-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.09.014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smoking remains the most important modifiable risk factor for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of bupropion therapy started in-hospital for smoking cessation in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS

We systematically searched the medical literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of in-hospital initiation of bupropion therapy for smoking cessation in patients with CVD. RCTs reporting smoking abstinence at 6 or 12 months were included.

RESULTS

Three RCTs, including 773 patients, were included in our analyses. Participants were predominantly men (range of means, 69.0%-83.8%), and the majority were hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (range of means, 66%-100%). Treatment duration ranged from 8-12 weeks. At the end of treatment, bupropion was associated with a significant increase in point prevalence abstinence (relative risk [RR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.45) but not continuous abstinence (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.97-1.45). However, bupropion was not associated with a significant increase in point prevalence abstinence (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92-1.48) or continuous abstinence (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.90-1.50) at 12 months. The results of the pooled analysis for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were inconclusive (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.93-1.78).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that bupropion improved abstinence over placebo at the end of treatment but that this effect did not persist at 12 months. Because of inconsistent reporting of safety data, the safety profile of bupropion therapy in this patient population remains unclear.

摘要

背景

吸烟仍然是心血管事件二级预防中最重要的可改变风险因素。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定在心血管疾病 (CVD) 患者住院期间开始使用安非他酮治疗戒烟的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们系统地搜索了医学文献,以确定 CVD 患者住院期间开始使用安非他酮治疗戒烟的随机对照试验 (RCT)。纳入报告 6 或 12 个月时戒烟率的 RCT。

结果

我们的分析纳入了 3 项 RCT,共 773 名患者。参与者主要为男性(均值范围,69.0%-83.8%),大多数因急性冠状动脉综合征 (ACS) 住院(均值范围,66%-100%)。治疗持续时间为 8-12 周。治疗结束时,安非他酮与显著增加点患病率的戒烟率相关(相对风险 [RR],1.21;95%置信区间 [CI],1.02-1.45),但不与连续戒烟率相关(RR,1.19;95% CI,0.97-1.45)。然而,安非他酮与 12 个月时的点患病率戒烟率(RR,1.17;95% CI,0.92-1.48)或连续戒烟率(RR,1.16;95% CI,0.90-1.50)无显著相关性。主要不良心脑血管事件的汇总分析结果不确定(RR,1.28;95% CI,0.93-1.78)。

结论

我们发现安非他酮在治疗结束时提高了戒烟率,但这种效果在 12 个月时并未持续。由于安全性数据报告不一致,安非他酮在该患者人群中的安全性仍不清楚。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验