*Orthopedics Division, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel †The Spine Unit, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom; and ‡Department of Emergency Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jan 1;39(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000038.
Prospective, single-blinded, and randomized clinical trial.
This study evaluates the added benefit of promethazine administration as an anxiolytic adjunct to morphine analgesia in reducing acute low back pain (LBP) compared with morphine alone.
Acute LBP is one of the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) visits. The optimal analgesic treatment for acute LBP remains controversial. Anxiety relief has been shown to improve pain management in the ED setting. We hypothesized that administration of the antihistamine promethazine as an anxiolytic adjunct to morphine analgesia will improve LBP management compared with morphine alone.
Fifty-nine adults, who were treated in our ED for severe acute LBP (visual analogue scale ≥ 70 mm), were randomly enrolled in the study. Thirty patients received slow infusion of intravenous (IV) morphine 0.1 mg/kg in normal saline and 29 patients received an analgesic regimen of IV morphine 0.1 mg/kg with promethazine 25 mg administered similarly. Pain and anxiety levels were subjectively assessed by the patients on a 100-mm visual analogue scale before and after treatment. Adverse event related to analgesia were recorded in real time.
After analgesia administration patients' pain rating decreased by 43 mm in the morphine group and by 39 mm in the morphine/promethazine group (P = 0.26). Similarly, patients' anxiety decreased by 19 mm in the morphine group and by 13 mm in the morphine/promethazine group (P = 0.37). The average ED stay was 78 minutes longer in the morphine/promethazine group (P = 0.01), due to the strong sedative effect of promethazine. Patients' satisfaction and the rate of adverse events were similar in both groups.
IV administration of morphine-promethazine regimen for pain and anxiety relief associated with acute LBP showed no advantage compared with IV morphine alone and significantly lengthened the overall ED stay. Thus, we think that promethazine has no place in acute LBP management in the adult ED setting.
前瞻性、单盲、随机临床试验。
本研究评估了在吗啡镇痛的基础上,给予苯海拉明作为抗焦虑辅助药物,与单独使用吗啡相比,是否能减轻急性腰痛(LBP)的效果。
急性 LBP 是急诊科(ED)就诊最常见的原因之一。急性 LBP 的最佳镇痛治疗仍存在争议。焦虑缓解已被证明可以改善 ED 环境中的疼痛管理。我们假设,与单独使用吗啡相比,给予抗组胺药苯海拉明作为吗啡镇痛的辅助抗焦虑药物,将改善 LBP 管理。
59 名因严重急性 LBP(视觉模拟评分≥70mm)在我们的 ED 接受治疗的成年人被随机纳入研究。30 名患者接受静脉(IV)吗啡 0.1mg/kg 生理盐水缓慢输注,29 名患者接受 IV 吗啡 0.1mg/kg 加苯海拉明 25mg 类似给药的镇痛方案。治疗前后,患者通过 100mm 视觉模拟量表主观评估疼痛和焦虑水平。实时记录与镇痛相关的不良事件。
镇痛治疗后,吗啡组患者疼痛评分下降 43mm,吗啡/苯海拉明组下降 39mm(P=0.26)。同样,吗啡组患者焦虑程度下降 19mm,吗啡/苯海拉明组下降 13mm(P=0.37)。由于苯海拉明的强烈镇静作用,吗啡/苯海拉明组在急诊科的平均停留时间延长了 78 分钟(P=0.01)。两组患者的满意度和不良事件发生率相似。
静脉注射吗啡-苯海拉明方案缓解与急性 LBP 相关的疼痛和焦虑,与单独静脉注射吗啡相比没有优势,并且明显延长了整体 ED 停留时间。因此,我们认为苯海拉明在成人 ED 环境中治疗急性 LBP 时没有作用。
1。