Suppr超能文献

寄养照料和家庭照料中青少年的特征与行为结果:基于全国数据的倾向得分匹配方法

Characteristics and Behavioral Outcomes for Youth in Group Care and Family-Based Care: A Propensity Score Matching Approach Using National Data.

作者信息

James Sigrid, Roesch Scott, Zhang Jin Jin

机构信息

Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.

出版信息

J Emot Behav Disord. 2012 Sep;20(3). doi: 10.1177/1063426611409041.

Abstract

This study aimed to answer two questions: (a) Given expected differences in children who are placed in group care compared to those in family-based settings, is it possible to match children on baseline characteristics? (b) Are there differences in behavioral outcomes for youth with episodes in group care versus those in family-based care? Using data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being, the study sample included 1,191 children with episodes in out-of-home care ( = 254 youth with group care episodes; = 937 youth with episodes in family-based care and no group care). Conditioning variables were identified, which distinguished between the two groups of youth. Using propensity score matching, all youth placed into group care were matched on the propensity score with family-based care youth. Behavioral outcomes at 36 months, as measured by the Child Behavior Checklist, were compared for the matched sample. Of the total 254 youth with group care episodes, 157 could be matched to youth with episodes in family-based care. No significant differences remained between the two groups in the matched sample, and findings revealed no significant differences in longitudinal behavioral outcomes.

摘要

本研究旨在回答两个问题

(a)鉴于与家庭环境中的儿童相比,进入集体照料的儿童存在预期差异,是否有可能使儿童在基线特征上相匹配?(b)有集体照料经历的青少年与有家庭照料经历的青少年在行为结果上是否存在差异?利用全国儿童和青少年幸福调查的数据,研究样本包括1191名有家庭外照料经历的儿童(=254名有集体照料经历的青少年;=937名有家庭照料经历且无集体照料经历的青少年)。确定了调节变量,以区分这两组青少年。使用倾向得分匹配法,将所有进入集体照料的青少年与有家庭照料经历的青少年在倾向得分上进行匹配。对匹配样本比较了36个月时由儿童行为清单测量的行为结果。在总共254名有集体照料经历的青少年中,157名可以与有家庭照料经历的青少年相匹配。匹配样本中两组之间不再存在显著差异,研究结果显示纵向行为结果没有显著差异。

相似文献

3
Commercial Sexual Exploitation Outcomes in a Community Sample of Youth.
J Adolesc Health. 2023 Jan;72(1):51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
4
Outcomes for youth receiving intensive in-home therapy or residential care: a comparison using propensity scores.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2007 Oct;77(4):497-505. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.77.4.497.
10
The Trauma of Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Youth: A Comparison of CSE Victims to Sexual Abuse Victims in a Clinical Sample.
J Interpers Violence. 2016 Jan;31(1):122-46. doi: 10.1177/0886260514555133. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

2
Systematic Review of the Evaluation of Foster Care Programs.
Psychosoc Interv. 2024 Jan 2;33(1):1-14. doi: 10.5093/pi2023a14. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
A Meta-Regression of Racial Disparities in Wellbeing Outcomes During and After Foster Care.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Oct;24(4):2711-2725. doi: 10.1177/15248380221111481. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
4
Foster Care: How We Can, and Should, Do More for Maltreated Children.
Soc Policy Rep. 2020 Nov;33(3):1-40. doi: 10.1002/sop2.10. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
5
Similarities and Differences in the Psychosocial Development of Children Placed in Different 24-h Settings.
J Child Fam Stud. 2018;27(4):1299-1310. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0955-6. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Comparing Long-Term Placement Outcomes of Residential and Family Foster Care: A Meta-Analysis.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019 Dec;20(5):653-664. doi: 10.1177/1524838017726427. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
8
Does Model Matter? Examining Change Across Time for Youth in Group Homes.
J Emot Behav Disord. 2017 Jun;25(2):119-128. doi: 10.1177/1063426616630520. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
9
Characteristics of Children in Foster Care, Family-Style Group Care, and Residential Care: A Scoping Review.
J Child Fam Stud. 2016;25:2357-2371. doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0418-5. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
10
Who Goes Where? Exploring Factors Related to Placement Among Group Homes.
J Emot Behav Disord. 2016 Mar;24(1):54-63. doi: 10.1177/1063426615585082. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Has the National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP) lost its way?
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Jul;45:40-41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
2
Patterns of movement for youth within an integrated continuum of residential services.
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010 Jun;32(6). doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.02.005.
3
Comparing Outcomes for Youth in Treatment Foster Care and Family-style Group Care.
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2008;30(7):746-757. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.12.002.
4
Outcomes for youth receiving intensive in-home therapy or residential care: a comparison using propensity scores.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2007 Oct;77(4):497-505. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.77.4.497.
5
Collaboration, integration and change in children's services: critical issues and key ingredients.
Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Jan;31(1):55-69. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.01.007. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
6
Placement into foster care and the interplay of urbanicity, child behavior problems, and poverty.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 Jul;76(3):358-66. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.3.358.
7
Residential treatment of children and adolescents: past, present, and future.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 Jul;76(3):285-94. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.3.285.
8
Residential treatment for youth: introduction and a cautionary tale.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 Jul;76(3):281-4. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.3.281.
9
Professionalizing the practice of public policy in the prevention of violence.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2006 Aug;34(4):475-9. doi: 10.1007/s10802-006-9040-0.
10
Monitoring and managing outcomes in residential treatment: practice-based evidence in search of evidence-based practice.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;45(2):247-51. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000190468.78200.4e.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验