James Sigrid, Roesch Scott, Zhang Jin Jin
Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.
J Emot Behav Disord. 2012 Sep;20(3). doi: 10.1177/1063426611409041.
This study aimed to answer two questions: (a) Given expected differences in children who are placed in group care compared to those in family-based settings, is it possible to match children on baseline characteristics? (b) Are there differences in behavioral outcomes for youth with episodes in group care versus those in family-based care? Using data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being, the study sample included 1,191 children with episodes in out-of-home care ( = 254 youth with group care episodes; = 937 youth with episodes in family-based care and no group care). Conditioning variables were identified, which distinguished between the two groups of youth. Using propensity score matching, all youth placed into group care were matched on the propensity score with family-based care youth. Behavioral outcomes at 36 months, as measured by the Child Behavior Checklist, were compared for the matched sample. Of the total 254 youth with group care episodes, 157 could be matched to youth with episodes in family-based care. No significant differences remained between the two groups in the matched sample, and findings revealed no significant differences in longitudinal behavioral outcomes.
(a)鉴于与家庭环境中的儿童相比,进入集体照料的儿童存在预期差异,是否有可能使儿童在基线特征上相匹配?(b)有集体照料经历的青少年与有家庭照料经历的青少年在行为结果上是否存在差异?利用全国儿童和青少年幸福调查的数据,研究样本包括1191名有家庭外照料经历的儿童(=254名有集体照料经历的青少年;=937名有家庭照料经历且无集体照料经历的青少年)。确定了调节变量,以区分这两组青少年。使用倾向得分匹配法,将所有进入集体照料的青少年与有家庭照料经历的青少年在倾向得分上进行匹配。对匹配样本比较了36个月时由儿童行为清单测量的行为结果。在总共254名有集体照料经历的青少年中,157名可以与有家庭照料经历的青少年相匹配。匹配样本中两组之间不再存在显著差异,研究结果显示纵向行为结果没有显著差异。