• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寄养照料项目评估的系统综述

Systematic Review of the Evaluation of Foster Care Programs.

作者信息

Vallejo-Slocker Laura, Idoiaga-Mondragon Nahia, Axpe Inge, Willi Rosalind, Guerra-Rodríguez Mercedes, Montserrat Carme, Del Valle Jorge F

机构信息

SOS Children's Villages Madrid Spain SOS Children's Villages, Madrid, Spain.

University of the Basque Country Leioa Spain University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain.

出版信息

Psychosoc Interv. 2024 Jan 2;33(1):1-14. doi: 10.5093/pi2023a14. eCollection 2024 Jan.

DOI:10.5093/pi2023a14
PMID:38313691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10835188/
Abstract

OBJETIVE

The aim of this study was to conduct an exhaustive synthesis to determine which instruments and variables are most appropriate to evaluate foster care programs (foster, kinship, and professional families). This evaluation includes the children, their foster families, their families of origin, professionals, and foster care technicians.

METHOD

The systematic review included randomized, quasi-randomized, longitudinal, and control group studies aimed at evaluating foster care interventions.

RESULTS

A total of 86 studies, 138 assessment instruments, 18 constructs, and 73 independent research teams were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) although the object of the evaluations was the children, the informants were usually the people in charge of their care; therefore, effort should be made to involve the children in a more participatory way; (2) psychosocial functioning, behavior, and parenting are transversal elements in most evaluations, while quality of life and coping are not sufficiently well incorporated; (3) practical instruments (brief and easy to apply and correct) that are widely used and carry scientific guarantees should be prioritized to ensure the comparability and reliability of the conclusions; and (4) progress should be made in the study of evaluation models for all forms of foster care, including foster, extended, and specialized families.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在进行全面综合分析,以确定哪些工具和变量最适合评估寄养照料项目(寄养家庭、亲属家庭和专业家庭)。该评估涵盖儿童、他们的寄养家庭、原生家庭、专业人员以及寄养照料技术人员。

方法

系统评价纳入了旨在评估寄养照料干预措施的随机、半随机、纵向和对照组研究。

结果

共识别出86项研究、138种评估工具、18个构念以及73个独立研究团队。

结论

(1)尽管评估对象是儿童,但提供信息者通常是负责照料他们的人;因此,应努力让儿童更积极地参与其中;(2)心理社会功能、行为和养育方式是大多数评估中的横向要素,而生活质量和应对能力的纳入不够充分;(3)应优先选用广泛使用且具有科学依据的实用工具(简短、易于应用和校正),以确保结论的可比性和可靠性;(4)在研究包括寄养家庭、大家庭和专业家庭在内的所有形式寄养照料的评估模型方面应取得进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/10835188/d809e224c512/1132-0559-pi-33-1-0001-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/10835188/47b5eb9b2432/1132-0559-pi-33-1-0001-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/10835188/c154b7c4a7ac/1132-0559-pi-33-1-0001-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/10835188/0e33fb6ff629/1132-0559-pi-33-1-0001-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/10835188/d809e224c512/1132-0559-pi-33-1-0001-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/10835188/47b5eb9b2432/1132-0559-pi-33-1-0001-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/10835188/c154b7c4a7ac/1132-0559-pi-33-1-0001-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/10835188/0e33fb6ff629/1132-0559-pi-33-1-0001-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b12/10835188/d809e224c512/1132-0559-pi-33-1-0001-gf04.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic Review of the Evaluation of Foster Care Programs.寄养照料项目评估的系统综述
Psychosoc Interv. 2024 Jan 2;33(1):1-14. doi: 10.5093/pi2023a14. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Program Components of Psychosocial Interventions in Foster and Kinship Care: A Systematic Review.寄养和亲属照顾中的心理社会干预计划内容:系统评价。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;21(1):13-40. doi: 10.1007/s10567-017-0247-0.
3
Caregivers on point: a randomized treatment-control prevention trial for foster and kinship caregivers to reduce behavior challenges among children in foster care.照顾者重点关注:一项针对寄养和亲属照顾者的随机治疗对照预防试验,以减少寄养儿童的行为挑战。
Trials. 2024 Oct 10;25(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08524-9.
4
Interventions to improve mental health and well-being in care-experienced children and young people aged less than 25: the CHIMES systematic review.改善25岁以下有照料经历的儿童和青少年心理健康与幸福感的干预措施:CHIMES系统评价
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Dec;12(14):1-124. doi: 10.3310/MKYP6299.
5
Parenting interventions to support parent/child attachment and psychosocial adjustment in foster and adoptive parents and children: A systematic review.支持寄养和领养父母及子女之间亲子依恋和心理社会适应的养育干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 5;18(1):e1209. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1209. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Effect of a Parenting Intervention on Foster Care Reentry After Reunification Among Substance-Affected Families: A Quasi-Experimental Study.育儿干预对受物质影响家庭团聚后重返寄养照料的影响:一项准实验研究。
Child Maltreat. 2017 Aug;22(3):194-204. doi: 10.1177/1077559517702743. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
7
Shared parenting: assessing the success of a foster parent program aimed at family reunification.共同养育:评估一项旨在实现家庭团聚的寄养父母计划的成效。
Child Abuse Negl. 1998 Apr;22(4):305-18. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(97)00177-4.
8
Dominant personal values and stress-coping strategies in relation to health and social conditions of kinship foster carers aged 60+ providing care for their biological grandchildren.60岁及以上为亲孙子孙女提供照料的亲属寄养照料者在健康和社会状况方面的主导个人价值观及压力应对策略。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05908-7.
9
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment.亲属照顾,旨在保障因遭受虐待而被带离家庭的儿童的安全、永久性安置及福祉。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 31;2014(1):CD006546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006546.pub3.
10
Enhancing foster care relationships through attachment-based intervention: the safe families study protocol, a randomized controlled trial of the circle of security parenting program.通过基于依恋的干预增强寄养关系:安全家庭研究方案,一项安全圈养育计划的随机对照试验
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 8;13(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02424-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Are the Average Effects of Foster Care Placement Really Close to Zero?寄养安置的平均效果真的接近于零吗?
Res Soc Work Pract. 2022 Jul;32(5):499-503. doi: 10.1177/10497315211065418. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
2
Perceived stress, resources and adaptation in relation to the COVID-19 lockdown in Spanish foster and non-foster families.西班牙寄养家庭和非寄养家庭中与新冠疫情封锁相关的感知压力、资源及适应情况
Child Fam Soc Work. 2022 Feb;27(1):55-66. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12871. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
3
Growth in self-regulation over the course of adolescence mediates the effects of foster care on psychopathology in post-institutionalized children: a randomized clinical trial.
青少年时期自我调节能力的发展介导了寄养照料对机构收容后儿童精神病理学的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2021 Sep;9(5):810-822. doi: 10.1177/2167702621993887. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
4
The Reflective Fostering Programme-improving the wellbeing of children in care through a group intervention for foster carers: a randomised controlled trial.《反思式养育方案——通过对寄养父母的小组干预来提高寄养儿童的幸福感:一项随机对照试验》。
Trials. 2021 Nov 25;22(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05739-y.
5
Pilot randomized controlled trial of an attachment- and trauma-focused intervention for kinship caregivers.亲职依附与创伤焦点干预对亲属照顾者之先导随机对照试验
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Oct;120:105178. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105178. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
6
Fostering Healthy Futures Preventive Intervention for Children in Foster Care: Long-term Delinquency Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial.促进健康未来——寄养儿童的预防干预:一项随机对照试验的长期犯罪结果。
Prev Sci. 2021 Nov;22(8):1120-1133. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01235-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
7
Foster Care: How We Can, and Should, Do More for Maltreated Children.寄养照料:我们能够且应该为受虐儿童做更多的事。
Soc Policy Rep. 2020 Nov;33(3):1-40. doi: 10.1002/sop2.10. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
8
Employment and further study outcomes for care-experienced graduates in the UK.英国有过寄养经历的毕业生的就业及深造情况
High Educ (Dordr). 2022;83(2):357-378. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00660-w. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
9
Evaluating the self-determination model for older youth in foster care: Establishing efficacy and exploring moderation of response to intervention.评估寄养环境中大龄青少年的自主决定模型:确定有效性并探索干预反应的调节因素。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020 Dec;119. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105419. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
10
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the fostering changes programme.促进变化计划的实用随机对照试验。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Oct;108:104646. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104646. Epub 2020 Aug 8.