Centre for Research on Rehabilitation and Protection, Clinical and Forensic Psychology Branch, Ministry of Social and Family Development, Singapore, Singapore.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019 Dec;20(5):653-664. doi: 10.1177/1524838017726427. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
This study presents findings from three separate meta-analyses investigating differences between children placed in residential care and in family foster care with regard to three outcomes: internalizing behaviors, externalizing behaviors, and perception of care. Based on publications from the last 20 years, a total of 23 studies were included. The total sample consisted of 13,630 children in care, with 7,469 from foster care and 6,161 from residential care. The results from this study indicated that children in foster care had consistently better experiences and less problems across the three outcomes as compared to children in residential care. Analyses did not reveal evidence of publication bias, and sensitivity analyses also suggested that results were not influenced by individual studies. Additionally, moderation analyses revealed that the differences between foster and residential care could vary depending on certain factors such as the publication year, the gross domestic product of the country, and the length of care. The implications of differences in outcomes between the two placements are discussed.
本研究通过三项独立的荟萃分析呈现了研究结果,旨在探讨安置在寄宿照料机构和家庭寄养照料机构的儿童在三个结果方面的差异:内化行为、外化行为和照料感知。基于过去 20 年的出版物,共纳入了 23 项研究。总样本由 13630 名在照料中的儿童组成,其中 7469 名来自寄养照料,6161 名来自寄宿照料。研究结果表明,与寄宿照料的儿童相比,寄养照料的儿童在三个结果方面的体验更好,问题更少。分析并未发现出版偏倚的证据,敏感性分析也表明,结果不受个别研究的影响。此外,调节分析表明,寄养和寄宿照料之间的差异可能因某些因素而有所不同,例如出版年份、国家的国内生产总值和照料时长。讨论了两种安置方式在结果上的差异所带来的影响。