1AP-HP, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Colombes, France. 2UMRS-722, Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMRS-722, Paris, France. 3Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHD Les Oudaries, La Roche sur Yon, France. 4AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France. 5Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Pellegrin-Tripode, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. 6Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHI Poissy-Saint-Germain en Laye, site de Saint-Germain, Saint-Germain en Laye, France. 7Service de Réanimation, CHU, Clermont Ferrand, France. 8Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Sainte Marguerite, Marseille, France. 9Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU Angers, Angers, France. 10Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU Nice, Nice, France. 11AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France. 12AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France. 13AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France. 14Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de la Côte de Nacre, Caen, France. 15Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest, France. 16Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU Tours, Tours, France. 17Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. 18Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Delafontaine, Saint-Denis, France. 19AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Service de Réanimation Médicale, Paris, France. 20Service de Réanimation Médicale et Polyvalente Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):886-95. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000049.
Providing appropriate training of procedural skills to residents while ensuring patient safety through trainee supervision is a difficult and constant challenge. We sought to determine how effective and safe procedural skill acquisition is in French ICUs and to identify failure and complication risk factors.
Multicenter prospective observational study. Invasive procedures performed by residents were recorded during two consecutive semesters.
Eighty-four residents.
Eighty-four residents.
None.
Number of invasive procedures performed, failure and complication rates, supervision, and assistance provided. Five thousand six hundred seventeen procedures were prospectively studied: 1,007 tracheal intubations, 1,272 arterial and 2,586 central venous catheter insertions, 457 fiberoptic bronchoscopies, and 295 chest tube insertions. During the semesters, residents performed a median of 10 intubations, 14 arterial catheter insertions, and 26 central venous catheter insertions. Complication rates were low, similar to those in the literature: 8.6% desaturation and 7.4% esophageal placement during intubation; 0.4% and 2.3% pneumothorax with jugular and subclavian central venous catheter insertions, respectively. We identified risk factors for failure and complications. Higher rates of failure and complications for intubation were associated with residents with no or little previous experience (p < 0.001); failure of internal jugular vein catheterization was associated with left-side insertion (p = 0.005) and absence of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.007). Supervision and assistance were more frequent at the beginning of the semester and for intubation and chest tube insertion. Finally, residents had less access to fiberoptic bronchoscopy and chest tube insertion.
Procedural skills acquisition by residents in the ICU appears feasible and safe with complication rates comparable to what has previously been reported. We identified specific procedures and situations associated with higher failure and complication rates that could require proactive training. Questions still remain regarding minimal numbers of procedures to attain competence and how best to provide procedural training.
在确保患者安全的前提下,为住院医师提供程序性技能培训是一项困难且持续的挑战。我们旨在确定法国 ICU 中程序性技能获取的有效性和安全性,并确定失败和并发症的风险因素。
多中心前瞻性观察性研究。在两个连续的学期中,记录住院医师进行的有创性操作。
84 名住院医师。
84 名住院医师。
无。
操作数量、失败和并发症发生率、监督和提供的协助。前瞻性研究了 5617 例操作:1007 例气管插管、1272 例动脉和 2586 例中心静脉导管插入、457 例纤维支气管镜检查和 295 例胸腔引流管插入。在两个学期中,住院医师中位数进行了 10 次插管、14 次动脉导管插入和 26 次中心静脉导管插入。并发症发生率较低,与文献报道相似:插管时 8.6%的血氧饱和度下降和 7.4%的食管放置;颈内和锁骨下中心静脉导管插入时分别为 0.4%和 2.3%的气胸。我们确定了失败和并发症的风险因素。插管失败和并发症发生率较高与无或很少有先前经验的住院医师相关(p<0.001);颈内静脉置管失败与左侧插入(p=0.005)和无机械通气(p=0.007)相关。在学期开始时以及进行插管和胸腔引流管插入时,监督和协助更为频繁。最后,住院医师较少接触纤维支气管镜和胸腔引流管插入。
在 ICU 中,住院医师获得程序性技能似乎是可行且安全的,并发症发生率与之前报道的相似。我们确定了与更高失败和并发症发生率相关的特定程序和情况,这些情况可能需要主动培训。关于获得能力所需的最低操作数量以及如何最好地提供操作培训的问题仍然存在。