• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在模拟操作过程中主治医生对包含29项内容的中心静脉导管集束检查表的依从性。

Attending Physician Adherence to a 29-Component Central Venous Catheter Bundle Checklist During Simulated Procedures.

作者信息

Barsuk Jeffrey H, Cohen Elaine R, Nguyen Duyhuu, Mitra Debi, O'Hara Kelly, Okuda Yasuharu, Feinglass Joe, Cameron Kenzie A, McGaghie William C, Wayne Diane B

机构信息

1Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Chicago, IL.2Department of Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.3The Simulation Learning, Education and Research Network (SimLEARN), Veterans Health Administration, Orlando, FL.4Department of Medical Education, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):1871-81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001831.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001831
PMID:27336437
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Central venous catheter insertions may lead to preventable adverse events. Attending physicians' central venous catheter insertion skills are not assessed routinely. We aimed to compare attending physicians' simulated central venous catheterinsertion performance to published competency standards.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of attending physicians' simulated internal jugular and subclavian central venous catheter insertion skills versus a historical comparison group of residents who participated in simulation training.

SETTING

Fifty-eight Veterans Affairs Medical Centers from February 2014 to December 2014 during a 2-day simulation-based education curriculum and two academic medical centers in Chicago.

SUBJECTS

A total of 108 experienced attending physicians and 143 internal medicine and emergency medicine residents.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Using a previously published central venous catheter insertion skills checklist, we compared Veterans Affairs Medical Centers attending physicians' simulated central venous catheter insertion performance to the same simulated performance by internal medicine and emergency medicine residents from two academic centers. Attending physician performance was compared to residents' baseline and posttest (after simulation training) performance. Minimum passing scores were set previously by an expert panel. Attending physicians performed higher on the internal jugular (median, 75.86% items correct; interquartile range, 68.97-86.21) and subclavian (median, 83.00%; interquartile range, 59.00-86.21) assessments compared to residents' internal jugular (median, 37.04% items correct; interquartile range, 22.22-68.97) and subclavian (median, 33.33%; interquartile range, 0.00-70.37; both p < 0.001) baseline assessments. Overall simulated performance was poor because only 12 of 67 attending physicians (17.9%) met or exceeded the minimum passing score for internal jugular central venous catheter insertion and only 11 of 47 (23.4%) met or exceeded the minimum passing score for subclavian central venous catheter insertion. Resident posttest performance after simulation training was significantly higher than attending physician performance (internal jugular: median, 96%; interquartile range, 93.10-100.00; subclavian: median, 100%; interquartile range, 96.00-100.00; both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates highly variable simulated central venous catheter insertion performance among a national cohort of experienced attending physicians. Hospitals, healthcare systems, and governing bodies should recognize that even experienced physicians require periodic clinical skill assessment and retraining.

摘要

目的

中心静脉导管插入术可能导致可预防的不良事件。主治医师的中心静脉导管插入技能未进行常规评估。我们旨在将主治医师模拟中心静脉导管插入操作的表现与已公布的能力标准进行比较。

设计

对主治医师模拟颈内静脉和锁骨下中心静脉导管插入技能进行前瞻性队列研究,并与参与模拟培训的住院医师历史对照组进行比较。

地点

2014年2月至2014年12月期间,在为期2天的基于模拟的教育课程中,选取了58家退伍军人事务医疗中心以及芝加哥的两家学术医疗中心。

研究对象

总共108名经验丰富的主治医师以及143名内科和急诊科住院医师。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

使用先前公布的中心静脉导管插入技能检查表,我们将退伍军人事务医疗中心主治医师模拟中心静脉导管插入操作的表现与来自两个学术中心的内科和急诊科住院医师的相同模拟操作表现进行比较。将主治医师的表现与住院医师的基线表现和测试后(模拟培训后)表现进行比较。最低及格分数先前由一个专家小组设定。与住院医师颈内静脉(中位数,正确项目为37.04%;四分位间距,22.22 - 68.97)和锁骨下(中位数,33.33%;四分位间距,0.00 - 70.37;两者p < 0.001)的基线评估相比,主治医师在颈内静脉(中位数,正确项目为75.86%;四分位间距,68.97 - 86.21)和锁骨下(中位数,83.00%;四分位间距,59.00 - 86.21)评估中的表现更高。总体模拟表现较差,因为67名主治医师中只有12名(17.9%)达到或超过颈内中心静脉导管插入的最低及格分数,47名中只有11名(23.4%)达到或超过锁骨下中心静脉导管插入的最低及格分数。模拟培训后住院医师的测试后表现显著高于主治医师的表现(颈内静脉:中位数,96%;四分位间距,93.10 - 100.00;锁骨下:中位数,100%;四分位间距,96.00 - 100.00;两者p < 0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,在全国一组经验丰富的主治医师中,模拟中心静脉导管插入操作的表现差异很大。医院、医疗保健系统和管理机构应认识到,即使是经验丰富的医生也需要定期进行临床技能评估和再培训。

相似文献

1
Attending Physician Adherence to a 29-Component Central Venous Catheter Bundle Checklist During Simulated Procedures.在模拟操作过程中主治医生对包含29项内容的中心静脉导管集束检查表的依从性。
Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):1871-81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001831.
2
Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit.基于模拟的掌握学习可减少医学重症监护病房中心静脉导管插入术期间的并发症。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2697-701.
3
Performance of Temporary Hemodialysis Catheter Insertion by Nephrology Fellows and Attending Nephrologists.肾脏病学研究员和肾脏病主治医生进行临时血液透析导管插入术的情况
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):1767-72. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01720215. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
4
Is long-axis view superior to short-axis view in ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization?在超声引导下中心静脉置管中,长轴视图是否优于短轴视图?
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):832-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000823.
5
Use of simulation-based mastery learning to improve the quality of central venous catheter placement in a medical intensive care unit.使用基于模拟的精通学习来提高重症监护病房中心静脉置管的质量。
J Hosp Med. 2009 Sep;4(7):397-403. doi: 10.1002/jhm.468.
6
Simulation training for pediatric residents on central venous catheter placement: a pilot study.儿科住院医师中央静脉置管模拟培训:一项试点研究。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov;14(9):e416-23. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31829f5eda.
7
Firm-based trial to improve central venous catheter insertion practices.基于企业的试验以改善中心静脉导管插入操作。
J Hosp Med. 2007 May;2(3):135-42. doi: 10.1002/jhm.168.
8
Residents' Procedural Experience Does Not Ensure Competence: A Research Synthesis.住院医师的操作经验并不能确保其胜任能力:一项研究综述。
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Apr;9(2):201-208. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00426.1.
9
Mastery learning of temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion by nephrology fellows using simulation technology and deliberate practice.肾内科住院医师通过模拟技术和刻意练习对临时血液透析导管插入术进行掌握性学习。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Jul;54(1):70-6. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.041. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
10
Psychometric Validation of Central Venous Catheter Insertion Mastery Learning Checklist Data and Decisions.中心静脉导管插入术掌握学习清单数据和决策的心理测量学验证。
Simul Healthc. 2021 Dec 1;16(6):378-385. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000516.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Simulation-based Mastery Learning on Management of Massive Hemoptysis.基于模拟的精通学习对大量咯血管理的影响。
ATS Sch. 2024 Mar 15;5(2):322-331. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0120IN. eCollection 2024 Jun 1.
2
Attending physicians as simulation learners: summary of current practices and barriers in emergency medicine.作为模拟学习者的主治医生:急诊医学当前实践与障碍综述
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;11(2):224-228. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.137. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
3
Healthcare Providers' Awareness and Perceptions of Competency Requirements in Central Venous Catheter Insertion.
医疗服务提供者对中心静脉导管插入术能力要求的认识与看法。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Jan 15;7:12. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000012.1. eCollection 2018.
4
Effect of Polypectomy Simulation-Based Mastery Learning on Skill Retention Among Practicing Endoscopists.基于息肉切除术模拟的掌握学习对实践内镜医生技能保持的影响。
Acad Med. 2024 Mar 1;99(3):317-324. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005538. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
5
Preventing mechanical complications associated with central venous catheter placement.预防与中心静脉导管置入相关的机械性并发症。
BJA Educ. 2023 Jun;23(6):229-237. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
6
Simulation-based Mastery Learning Improves Critical Care Skills of Advanced Practice Providers.基于模拟的精通学习提高了高级实践提供者的重症护理技能。
ATS Sch. 2023 Jan 23;4(1):48-60. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0065OC. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Treatment of status epilepticus in pediatrics: curriculum learning combined with in-situ simulations.儿科癫痫持续状态的治疗:课程学习与现场模拟相结合。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03626-x.
8
Old Dog, New Trick: Efficacy of Self-Directed Procedural Training for Attending Critical Care Physicians.老狗学新招:自我指导程序训练对重症监护主治医师的效果
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Apr 28;9:23821205221096268. doi: 10.1177/23821205221096268. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Effectiveness of a simulation-based mastery learning to train clinicians on a novel cricothyrotomy procedure at an academic medical centre during a pandemic: a quasi-experimental cohort study.模拟为基础的掌握学习在学术医学中心大流行期间对临床医生进行新型环甲膜切开术培训的效果:一项准实验性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 19;11(11):e054746. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054746.
10
Mastery learning improves simulated central venous catheter insertion by emergency medicine teaching faculty.掌握式学习可提高急诊医学教师模拟中心静脉导管插入术的教学效果。
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Aug 1;5(4):e10703. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10703. eCollection 2021 Aug.