1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 2Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York, NY. 3Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 4Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA. 5Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 6Center for Policy Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 7CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 8Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 9Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):763-70. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000044.
To use the natural experiment of health insurance reform in Massachusetts to study the impact of increased insurance coverage on ICU utilization and mortality.
Population-based cohort study.
Massachusetts and four states (New York, Washington, Nebraska, and North Carolina) that did not enact reform.
All nonpregnant nonelderly adults (age 18-64 yr) admitted to nonfederal acute care hospitals in one of the five states of interest were eligible, excluding patients who were not residents of a respective state at the time of admission.
We used a difference-in-differences approach to compare trends in ICU admissions and outcomes of in-hospital mortality and discharge destination for ICU patients.
Healthcare reform in Massachusetts was associated with a decrease in ICU patients without insurance from 9.3% to 5.1%. There were no significant changes in adjusted ICU admission rates, mortality, or discharge destination. In a sensitivity analysis excluding a state that enacted Medicaid reform prior to the study period, our difference-in-differences analysis demonstrated a significant increase in mortality of 0.38% per year (95% CI, 0.12-0.64%) in Massachusetts, attributable to a greater per-year decrease in mortality postreform in comparison states (-0.37%; 95% CI, -0.52% to -0.21%) compared with Massachusetts (0.01%; 95% CI, -0.20% to 0.11%).
Massachusetts healthcare reform increased the number of ICU patients with insurance but was not associated with significant changes in ICU use or discharge destination among ICU patients. Reform was also not associated with changed in-hospital mortality for ICU patients; however, this association was dependent on the comparison states chosen in the analysis.
利用马萨诸塞州医疗保险改革的自然实验,研究保险覆盖范围增加对 ICU 使用和死亡率的影响。
基于人群的队列研究。
马萨诸塞州和四个未实施改革的州(纽约、华盛顿、内布拉斯加州和北卡罗来纳州)。
所有非孕妇非老年人(18-64 岁),符合条件的是入住五个有兴趣的州之一的非联邦急性护理医院的成年人,不包括入院时非所在州居民的患者。
我们使用差异中的差异方法来比较 ICU 入院和院内死亡率以及 ICU 患者出院去向的趋势。
马萨诸塞州的医疗保健改革与没有保险的 ICU 患者比例从 9.3%下降到 5.1%有关。调整后的 ICU 入院率、死亡率或出院去向没有显著变化。在排除研究期间实施医疗补助改革的一个州的敏感性分析中,我们的差异中的差异分析表明,马萨诸塞州的死亡率每年显著增加 0.38%(95%CI,0.12-0.64%),这归因于与马萨诸塞州相比,比较州的死亡率每年下降幅度更大(-0.37%;95%CI,-0.52%至-0.21%),而马萨诸塞州的死亡率每年仅下降 0.01%(95%CI,-0.20%至 0.11%)。
马萨诸塞州医疗保健改革增加了有保险的 ICU 患者数量,但与 ICU 患者的 ICU 使用或出院去向无显著变化相关。改革也与 ICU 患者的院内死亡率无变化相关;然而,这种关联取决于分析中选择的比较州。