Department of Botany, Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, 70803, Louisiana.
J Chem Ecol. 1988 Jan;14(1):181-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01022540.
In bioassays for allelopathy, where responses to treatments are determined in conjunction with responses to independent controls, statistical comparisons among treatments require an index which measures each treatment response (T) in relation to its control response (C). The most commonly used index, the treatment-control ratio (T/C), exhibits two analytical problems. First, means ofT/C values are distorted upward when any of the individual values is greater than one, i.e., when stimulation occurs. Second, the distribution ofT/C values may not be normal and homoscedastic. We provide two alternative indices of response whose means do not exhibit the upward distortion ofT/C means. Then, the two indices are compared toT/C values in an empirical test for normality and homoscedasticity on a large bioassay data set. Results indicate that for this data set, one of the alternatives,RI, is clearly superior.RI is defined as 1 - (C/T) ifT≥C and asT/C - 1 ifT <C.
在化感作用的生物测定中,当处理的反应与独立对照的反应一起确定时,处理之间的统计比较需要一个指标,该指标衡量每个处理反应(T)相对于其对照反应(C)的情况。最常用的指标是处理-对照比(T/C),它存在两个分析问题。首先,当任何一个个体值大于 1 时,即发生刺激时,T/C 值的平均值会向上扭曲。其次,T/C 值的分布可能不是正态和同方差的。我们提供了两种替代的反应指标,它们的平均值不会出现 T/C 平均值的向上扭曲。然后,在一个大型生物测定数据集上,对正态性和同方差性进行了经验检验,将这两个指标与 T/C 值进行了比较。结果表明,对于这个数据集,其中一个替代指标 RI 明显更优。RI 的定义是,如果 T≥C,则为 1-(C/T);如果 T<C,则为 T/C-1。