• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再次探讨肩胛运动障碍:俯卧位三维肩胛骨 CT 检查。

Revisit to scapular dyskinesis: three-dimensional wing computed tomography in prone position.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Global Center for Shoulder & Elbow, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical College, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, South Korea.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Jun;23(6):821-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.016
PMID:24280352
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) wing computed tomography (CT) showed a high inter-rater reliability in assessing scapular dyskinesis.

METHODS

The 330 scapular movements of 165 patients were classified into 4 types by 7 blinded observers. Then, 3D wing CT was performed with patients prone, and 4 blinded observers measured 5 angles, consisting of upward rotation (UR) superior translation (ST), anterior tilting (AT), protraction (PRO), and internal rotation (IR). The inter-rater reliability (IRR) of 2 methods was calculated, and cutoff values were determined for the 5 angles on the 3D wing CT images.

RESULTS

The IRR was 0.783 for the observational method of scapular dyskinesis and 0.981 for 3D wing CT in the prone position. UR and ST angles were significantly larger in type 3 more than in the other types (P < .001, P < .001), and the AT angle showed a similar pattern in type 1 (P < .001). The PRO angle was significantly larger in types 1, 2, and 3 more than in type 4 (P < .001, P < .001, P = .013), and the IR angle was significantly larger in type 2 more than in the other types (P < .001). The cutoff values of the 5 angles were UR, 117°; ST, 90°; AT, 8°; PRO, 99°; and IR, 51°. The UR angle showed a significant correlation with glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (odds ratio, 0.436; P = .029) and the IR angle with MDI (odds ratio, 8.947; P = .048).

CONCLUSION

The patients with a high UR angle showed a low rate of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and those with a high IR angle had a high rate of the MDI in affected shoulder by the determinant of the cutoff value of the 5 angles.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, development of diagnostic criteria with nonconsecutive patients, diagnostic study.

摘要

背景

三维(3D)肩胛骨 CT 成像在评估肩胛骨运动障碍方面具有较高的观察者间可靠性。

方法

由 7 位盲法观察者对 165 例患者的 330 个肩胛骨运动进行分类。然后,让患者俯卧位进行 3D 肩胛骨 CT 检查,由 4 位盲法观察者测量 5 个角度,包括上旋(UR)、上移(ST)、前倾斜(AT)、前伸(PRO)和内旋(IR)。计算 2 种方法的观察者间可靠性(IRR),并确定 3D 肩胛骨 CT 图像上 5 个角度的截断值。

结果

肩胛骨运动障碍的观察法的 IRR 为 0.783,俯卧位 3D 肩胛骨 CT 的 IRR 为 0.981。与其他类型相比,第 3 型的 UR 和 ST 角度明显更大(P <.001,P <.001),而第 1 型的 AT 角度也呈现出相似的模式(P <.001)。与第 4 型相比,第 1、2 和 3 型的 PRO 角度明显更大(P <.001,P <.001,P =.013),IR 角度在第 2 型中明显更大(P <.001)。5 个角度的截断值为 UR,117°;ST,90°;AT,8°;PRO,99°;IR,51°。UR 角度与盂肱关节内旋不足呈显著相关性(比值比,0.436;P =.029),IR 角度与 MDI 呈显著相关性(比值比,8.947;P =.048)。

结论

UR 角度较高的患者,其盂肱关节内旋不足的发生率较低;IR 角度较高的患者,其患肩的 MDI 发生率较高,这是由 5 个角度的截断值决定的。

证据等级

三级,基于非连续患者的诊断标准制定,诊断研究。

相似文献

1
Revisit to scapular dyskinesis: three-dimensional wing computed tomography in prone position.再次探讨肩胛运动障碍:俯卧位三维肩胛骨 CT 检查。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Jun;23(6):821-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Nov 23.
2
How to assess scapular dyskinesis precisely: 3-dimensional wing computer tomography--a new diagnostic modality.如何精确评估肩胛骨运动障碍:3 维翼计算机断层扫描——一种新的诊断方式。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Aug;22(8):1084-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.046. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
3
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Scapular Kinematics During Arm Elevation in Baseball Players With Scapular Dyskinesis: Comparison of Dominant and Nondominant Arms.肩胛运动障碍棒球运动员手臂抬高过程中肩胛骨运动的三维分析:优势臂与非优势臂的比较。
J Sport Rehabil. 2020 Jan 1;29(1):93-101. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2017-0216.
4
A preliminary exploration of plain-film radiography in scapular dyskinesis evaluation.肩胛运动障碍评估中普通 X 线摄影的初步探索。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jul;27(7):e210-e218. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.032. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
Scapula Dyskinesis: A Review of Current Concepts and Evaluation of Assessment Tools.肩胛运动障碍:当前概念综述及评估工具评价
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2018 Oct;17(10):338-346. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000526.
6
Specific kinematics and associated muscle activation in individuals with scapular dyskinesis.肩胛运动障碍个体的特定运动学及相关肌肉激活情况。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Aug;24(8):1227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
7
Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder.评估常规临床 X 线和肩部 CT 检查中的肩盂倾斜度。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Aug;21(8):1096-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.010. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
8
Do stingers affect scapular kinematics in rugby players?刺痛会影响橄榄球运动员的肩胛运动学吗?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):e293-e299. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
9
Evaluation of clinical assessment methods for scapular dyskinesis.肩胛运动障碍的临床评估方法评估。
Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov;25(11):1240-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.007.
10
In vivo three-dimensional scapular kinematic alterations after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.反向全肩关节置换术后肩胛骨的体内三维运动学改变。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Jan-Apr;28(2):2309499020921979. doi: 10.1177/2309499020921979.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients posture affects clinical outcomes and range of motion after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A clinical study.患者姿势对反式全肩关节置换术后临床疗效及活动范围的影响:一项临床研究。
JSES Int. 2024 Nov 9;9(2):445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.10.002. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Dynamic rasterstereography improves the detection of movement delays and dynamic asymmetries in the scapulothoracic kinematic of healthy subjects.动态光栅立体摄影术可提高对健康受试者肩胛胸壁运动学中运动延迟和动态不对称的检测能力。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Dec 18;11(4):e70115. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70115. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Differences in Osseous Shoulder Morphology, Scapulothoracic Orientation, and Muscle Volume in Patients With Constitutional Static Posterior Shoulder Instability (Type C1) Compared With Healthy Controls.
与健康对照组相比,患有特发性静态后向肩不稳(C1 型)的患者在骨骼肩部形态、肩胛胸廓取向和肌肉体积方面存在差异。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Apr;52(5):1299-1307. doi: 10.1177/03635465241233706. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
Is it Time to Normalize Scapular Dyskinesis? The Incidence of Scapular Dyskinesis in Those With and Without Symptoms: a Systematic Review of the Literature.是时候将肩胛运动障碍正常化了吗?有症状和无症状人群中肩胛运动障碍的发生率:文献系统综述。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Jun 1;V18(3):558-576. doi: 10.26603/001c.74388. eCollection 2023.
5
Improvement in scapular dyskinesis after rotator cuff repair and subacromial decompression.肩袖修补术和肩峰下减压术后肩胛带运动障碍的改善。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Dec;29(12):3961-3970. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06681-x. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
6
Shoulder girdle formation and positioning during embryonic and early fetal human development.胚胎和早期胎儿人类发育过程中肩带的形成和定位。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238225. eCollection 2020.
7
EFFICACY OF REFLEXIVE NEUROMUSCULAR STABILIZATION DURING TREATMENT OF SCAPULAR DYSKINESIA IN AN OVERHEAD ATHLETE: A CASE REPORT.反射性神经肌肉稳定化技术在一名上肢运动员肩胛运动障碍治疗中的疗效:病例报告
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Dec;13(6):1073-1082.
8
The contribution of the scapula to active shoulder motion and self-assessed function in three hundred and fifty two patients prior to elective shoulder surgery.肩胛骨对352例择期肩部手术患者主动肩部活动及自我评估功能的影响。
Int Orthop. 2018 Nov;42(11):2645-2651. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4027-3. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit and Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肩肱关节内旋不足与损伤:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 May 22;6(5):2325967118773322. doi: 10.1177/2325967118773322. eCollection 2018 May.
10
Prevalence of Scapular Dyskinesis in Overhead and Nonoverhead Athletes: A Systematic Review.肩胛运动障碍在上肢和非上肢运动员中的流行率:系统评价。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Feb 17;4(2):2325967115627608. doi: 10.1177/2325967115627608. eCollection 2016 Feb.