Johnson Jordan E, Fullmer Joshua A, Nielsen Chaseton M, Johnson Joshua K, Moorman Claude T
Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine, Campbell University, Lillington, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 May 22;6(5):2325967118773322. doi: 10.1177/2325967118773322. eCollection 2018 May.
There is an association between throwing activity and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD). An 18° to 20° deficit has been adopted as the standard definition of pathological GIRD, but specific findings as to how GIRD relates to an injury are inconsistent.
To systematically review the literature to clarify the definition of GIRD diagnosis for adolescent and adult overhead athletes and to examine the association between GIRD and an increased risk of injuries in these athletes.
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
A systematic review of the literature was performed. Observational studies comparing glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion (ROM) in injured and uninjured overhead athletes were included for the meta-analysis. Studies of adolescent and adult athletes were analyzed separately. ROM was compared for the injured and uninjured groups, and a weighted mean GIRD was estimated. To account for potential heterogeneity across studies, both fixed- and random-effects models were used to calculate a standardized mean difference (SMD).
Nine studies of level 3 or 4 evidence were included. From these, 12 study groups (4 adolescent, 8 adult) comprising 819 overhead athletes (226 injured, 593 uninjured) were included in the meta-analysis. The estimated SMD in GIRD between the injured and uninjured groups was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.15-0.77; < .01) for the overall sample. The between-group effect was larger for adults (SMD, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.18 to 1.02]; < .01) than adolescents (SMD, 0.20 [95% CI, -0.24 to 0.63]; = .13). The weighted mean GIRD for the injured and uninjured groups was 13.8° ± 5.6° and 9.6° ± 3.0°, respectively, which also differed by age group. Moderate study heterogeneity was observed ( = 69.0%).
Based on this systematic review, the current definition of pathological GIRD may be too conservative, and a distinct definition may be required for adolescent and adult athletes. While the results indicate a link between internal rotation deficits and upper extremity injuries in the overhead athlete, higher quality prospective research is needed to clarify the role that GIRD plays in future injuries to overhead athletes of various ages.
投掷活动与盂肱关节内旋不足(GIRD)之间存在关联。18°至20°的不足已被用作病理性GIRD的标准定义,但关于GIRD与损伤之间关系的具体研究结果并不一致。
系统回顾文献,以明确青少年和成年过头运动运动员GIRD诊断的定义,并研究GIRD与这些运动员受伤风险增加之间的关联。
系统回顾;证据等级,4级。
对文献进行系统回顾。纳入比较受伤和未受伤过头运动运动员盂肱关节内旋活动范围(ROM)的观察性研究进行荟萃分析。分别分析青少年和成年运动员的研究。比较受伤组和未受伤组的ROM,并估计加权平均GIRD。为了考虑研究间潜在的异质性,使用固定效应模型和随机效应模型来计算标准化平均差(SMD)。
纳入了9项3级或4级证据的研究。其中,12个研究组(4个青少年组,8个成年组)共819名过头运动运动员(226名受伤,593名未受伤)被纳入荟萃分析。总体样本中,受伤组和未受伤组GIRD的估计SMD为0.46(95%CI,0.15 - 0.77;P <.01)。成年组的组间效应(SMD,0.60 [95%CI,0.18至1.02];P <.01)大于青少年组(SMD,0.20 [95%CI,-0.24至0.63];P =.13)。受伤组和未受伤组的加权平均GIRD分别为13.8°±5.6°和9.6°±3.0°,不同年龄组之间也存在差异。观察到中等程度的研究异质性(I² = 69.0%)。
基于这项系统回顾,目前病理性GIRD的定义可能过于保守,青少年和成年运动员可能需要不同的定义。虽然结果表明过头运动运动员的内旋不足与上肢损伤之间存在联系,但需要更高质量的前瞻性研究来阐明GIRD在不同年龄过头运动运动员未来损伤中所起的作用。