Suppr超能文献

如何精确评估肩胛骨运动障碍:3 维翼计算机断层扫描——一种新的诊断方式。

How to assess scapular dyskinesis precisely: 3-dimensional wing computer tomography--a new diagnostic modality.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Aug;22(8):1084-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.046. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aberrations in scapular motion are believed to be associated with the presence of shoulder or elbow pathologies. There are many methods to evaluate scapular kinematics, but they have certain limitations. Nevertheless, it is believed that appropriate rehabilitation for each type of scapular dyskinesis is important.

METHODS

Eighty-nine athletes were videotaped and seven blinded observers categorized scapular dyskinesis into 4 types, which was followed by 3-dimensional (3D) wing computer tomography (CT). Four blinded examiners evaluated 5 angles [upward rotation (UR), internal rotation (IR), anterior tilting (AT), superior translation (ST), and protraction (PRO)] on the 3D wing CT. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) was calculated for both the methods. CT scan measurements were compared with the 4 observational types to establish the validity.

RESULTS

The IRR with observational assessment of scapular dyskinesis into 4 types was good, 0.780. The 3D wing CT analysis had a very high IRR, 0.972. There was a statistically significant correlation between observational assessment and 3D wing CT analysis. The UR angle, ST angle in type 3 scapular dyskinesis, and AT angle in type 1 scapular dyskinesis were increased as compared with those in the other types of scapular dyskinesis. All these measurements were made in the resting position of the scapula.

CONCLUSION

The 3D wing CT analysis allows precise quantification of a position associated with scapular dyskinesis. Therefore, 3D wing CT can be considered as an alternative method for assessing scapular dyskinesis.

摘要

背景

肩胛骨运动的异常被认为与肩部或肘部病变的存在有关。有许多方法可以评估肩胛骨运动学,但它们都存在一定的局限性。然而,人们认为针对每种类型的肩胛骨运动障碍进行适当的康复治疗很重要。

方法

对 89 名运动员进行录像,7 名盲法观察者将肩胛骨运动障碍分为 4 种类型,然后进行三维(3D)肩胛骨翼状 CT 检查。4 名盲法检查者评估 3D 肩胛骨翼状 CT 上的 5 个角度[上旋(UR)、内旋(IR)、前倾斜(AT)、上移(ST)和前伸(PRO)]。计算了这两种方法的组内相关系数(IRR)。将 CT 扫描测量值与 4 种观察类型进行比较,以确定其有效性。

结果

4 种类型的肩胛骨运动障碍的观察评估的 IRR 较好,为 0.780。3D 肩胛骨翼状 CT 分析的 IRR 非常高,为 0.972。观察评估与 3D 肩胛骨翼状 CT 分析之间存在统计学显著相关性。3 型肩胛骨运动障碍的 UR 角、ST 角和 1 型肩胛骨运动障碍的 AT 角均高于其他类型的肩胛骨运动障碍。所有这些测量都是在肩胛骨的休息位置进行的。

结论

3D 肩胛骨翼状 CT 分析可精确量化与肩胛骨运动障碍相关的位置。因此,3D 肩胛骨翼状 CT 可被视为评估肩胛骨运动障碍的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验