Anders Markus P, Breckenkamp Jürgen, Blettner Maria, Schlehofer Brigitte, Berg-Beckhoff Gabriele
1 Association of Dermatological Prevention, Hamburg, Germany
2 Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Dec;24(6):968-73. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt175. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
Good sleep quality is essential for recovery. The risk factors of sleep disorders have been extensively investigated, but there is sparse information on the association of socioeconomic factors with a person's sleep quality. The aim of the present analysis is to investigate this association, taking particularly the effect of health confounders into consideration.
The data were extracted from the cross-sectional QUEBEB Study. In total, the study sample consisted of 3281 participants (1817 women and 1464 men, aged 16-72 years). Here socioeconomic status (SES) was collected from the baseline survey taken in 2004. Sleep quality for the same participants was measured with in-depth personal interviews in 2006 using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, together with other relevant characteristics (e.g. anxiety, depression and health status). Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed.
People living in an urban environment with a high or medium SES have a greater probability of good sleep quality (odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.27-2.14; odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.69) than persons with a low SES. Anxiety and depression, but also health status, are also associated with sleep quality and can influence in part the socioeconomic levels seen in sleep quality.
SES and sleep quality are associated. However, there are important additional determinants that influence the level of association between SES and sleep quality. Several factors, such as anxiety, depression and health status, are associated with poorer sleep quality, but at the same time, these factors occur more often within lower social classes.
良好的睡眠质量对康复至关重要。睡眠障碍的风险因素已得到广泛研究,但关于社会经济因素与个人睡眠质量之间关联的信息却很少。本分析的目的是研究这种关联,尤其要考虑健康混杂因素的影响。
数据取自横断面的魁北克研究。该研究样本总共包括3281名参与者(1817名女性和1464名男性,年龄在16 - 72岁之间)。这里的社会经济地位(SES)是从2004年进行的基线调查中收集的。2006年通过使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数对相同参与者进行深入个人访谈来测量睡眠质量,同时还收集了其他相关特征(如焦虑、抑郁和健康状况)。进行了多项逻辑回归分析。
与低社会经济地位的人相比,生活在高或中等社会经济地位城市环境中的人睡眠质量良好的可能性更大(优势比1.65,95%置信区间1.27 - 2.14;优势比1.40,95%置信区间1.16 - 1.69)。焦虑、抑郁以及健康状况也与睡眠质量相关,并且在一定程度上会影响睡眠质量方面所呈现的社会经济水平。
社会经济地位与睡眠质量相关。然而,还有一些重要的额外决定因素会影响社会经济地位与睡眠质量之间的关联程度。一些因素,如焦虑、抑郁和健康状况,与较差的睡眠质量相关,但同时,这些因素在较低社会阶层中更常出现。