Department of Pulmonology, Army Share Fund Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Department of Global Health and Ecoepidemiology, Redavi Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2023 Mar 1;19(3):605-620. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10336.
This review aims to assess the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and sleep health in the general population and the mediating effects of lifestyle and mental and physical health in this relationship.
Observational studies testing the independent association between objective or subjective SES indicators and behavioral/physiological or clinical sleep health variables in the general population were included. PubMed/MEDLINE was searched for reports published from January 1990 to December 2019. The direction of effect was used as the primary effect measure, testing the hypothesis that low SES is associated with poor sleep health outcomes. Results are presented in the form of direction effect plots and synthesized as binomial proportions.
Overall, 336 studies were identified. A high proportion of effects at the expected direction was noted for measures of sleep continuity (100% for sleep latency, 50-100% for awakenings, 66.7-100% for sleep efficiency), symptoms of disturbed sleep (75-94.1% for insomnia, 66.7-100% for sleep-disordered breathing, 60-100% for hypersomnia), and general sleep satisfaction (62.5-100%), while the effect on sleep duration was inconsistent and depended on the specific SES variable (92.3% for subjective SES, 31.7% for employment status). Lifestyle habits, chronic illnesses, and psychological factors were identified as key mediators of the SES-sleep relationship.
Unhealthy behaviors, increased stress levels, and limited access to health care in low-SES individuals may explain the SES-sleep health gradient. However, the cross-sectional design of most studies and the high heterogeneity in employed measures of SES and sleep limit the quality of evidence. Further research is warranted due to important implications for health issues and policy changes.
Papadopoulos D, Etindele Sosso FA. Socioeconomic status and sleep health: a narrative synthesis of 3 decades of empirical research. . 2023;19(3):605-620.
本综述旨在评估社会经济地位(SES)与普通人群睡眠健康之间的关联,以及生活方式、心理健康和身体健康在这种关系中的中介作用。
纳入了观察性研究,这些研究测试了客观或主观 SES 指标与普通人群中行为/生理或临床睡眠健康变量之间的独立关联。使用 PubMed/MEDLINE 检索了 1990 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月发表的报告。使用方向效应作为主要效应测量指标,检验 SES 较低与较差的睡眠健康结果相关的假设。结果以方向效应图的形式呈现,并以二项式比例进行综合。
共确定了 336 项研究。注意到与睡眠连续性相关的大部分措施的预期方向效应比例较高(睡眠潜伏期为 100%,觉醒次数为 50-100%,睡眠效率为 66.7-100%),与睡眠障碍症状(失眠为 75-94.1%,睡眠呼吸障碍为 66.7-100%,嗜睡为 60-100%)和总体睡眠满意度(62.5-100%)相关的措施也有较高的预期方向效应,而睡眠持续时间的影响则不一致,这取决于特定的 SES 变量(主观 SES 为 92.3%,就业状况为 31.7%)。生活方式习惯、慢性疾病和心理因素被确定为 SES 与睡眠关系的关键中介因素。
SES 较低的个体中不健康的行为、压力水平升高以及获得医疗保健的机会有限,可能解释了 SES 与睡眠健康之间的梯度关系。然而,由于大多数研究的横断面设计以及 SES 和睡眠的就业措施高度异质性,限制了证据的质量。由于对健康问题和政策变化有重要影响,因此需要进一步研究。
Papadopoulos D, Etindele Sosso FA. 社会经济地位与睡眠健康:30 年实证研究综述。睡眠医学评论,2023;19(3):605-620.