Suppr超能文献

美国的计划在家分娩与专业性:批判性评估

Planned home birth in the United States and professionalism: a critical assessment.

作者信息

Chervenak Frank A, McCullough Laurence B, Grünebaum Amos, Arabin Birgit, Levene Malcolm I, Brent Robert L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Ethics. 2013 Fall;24(3):184-91.

Abstract

Planned home birth has been considered by some to be consistent with professional responsibility in patient care. This article critically assesses the ethical and scientific justification for this view and shows it to be unjustified. We critically assess recent statements by professional associations of obstetricians, one that sanctions and one that endorses planned home birth. We base our critical appraisal on the professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics, which is based on the ethical concept of medicine from the Scottish and English Enlightenments of the 18th century. Our critical assessment supports the following conclusions. Because of its significantly increased, preventable perinatal risks, planned home birth in the United States is not clinically or ethically benign. Attending planned home birth, no matter one's training or experience, is not acting in a professional capacity, because this role preventably results in clinically unnecessary and therefore clinically unacceptable perinatal risk. It is therefore not consistent with the ethical concept of medicine as a profession for any attendant to planned home birth to represent himself or herself as a "professional." Obstetric healthcare associations should neither sanction nor endorse planned home birth. Instead, these associations should recommend against planned home birth. Obstetric healthcare professionals should respond to expressions of interest in planned home birth by pregnant women by informing them that it incurs significantly increased, preventable perinatal risks, by recommending strongly against planned home birth, and by recommending strongly for planned hospital birth. Obstetric healthcare professionals should routinely provide excellent obstetric care to all women transferred to the hospital from a planned home birth.The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics requires obstetricians to address and remedy legitimate dissatisfaction with some hospital settings and address patients' concerns about excessive interventions. Creating a sustained culture of comprehensive safety, which cannot be achieved in planned home birth, informed by compassionate and respectful treatment of pregnant women, should be a primary focus of professional obstetric responsibility.

摘要

一些人认为计划在家分娩符合患者护理中的专业责任。本文批判性地评估了这一观点的伦理和科学依据,并表明它是不合理的。我们批判性地评估了产科医生专业协会最近的声明,一个批准计划在家分娩,另一个支持计划在家分娩。我们的批判性评价基于产科伦理的专业责任模型,该模型基于18世纪苏格兰和英国启蒙运动的医学伦理概念。我们的批判性评估支持以下结论。由于计划在家分娩会显著增加可预防的围产期风险,在美国,计划在家分娩在临床和伦理上都并非无害。参与计划在家分娩,无论个人的培训或经验如何,都不是以专业身份行事,因为这种做法可预防地导致临床上不必要且因此临床上不可接受的围产期风险。因此,对于任何计划在家分娩的陪护人员而言,将自己标榜为“专业人员”与医学作为一门职业的伦理概念并不相符。产科医疗协会既不应批准也不应支持计划在家分娩。相反,这些协会应建议反对计划在家分娩。产科医疗专业人员在回应孕妇对计划在家分娩的兴趣表达时,应告知她们这会带来显著增加的、可预防的围产期风险,强烈建议反对计划在家分娩,并强烈推荐计划在医院分娩。产科医疗专业人员应常规地为所有从计划在家分娩中转至医院的妇女提供优质的产科护理。产科伦理的专业责任模型要求产科医生解决并纠正对某些医院环境的合理不满,并解决患者对过度干预的担忧。营造一种持续的全面安全文化,这在计划在家分娩中无法实现,应以对孕妇的关爱和尊重为指导,这应是产科专业责任的首要重点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验