From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York; the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; and the Center for Mother and Child, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;117(5):1183-1187. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182172a97.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College) Committee Opinion, "Planned Home Birth," invokes two core concepts of obstetric ethics, the right of a woman to make a medically informed decision about delivery and the informed consent process. We set out a framework for obstetric ethics that empowers the autonomy of pregnant women by focusing on when, in beneficence-based clinical judgment, clinical management should be offered, should be recommended, and should be recommended against in the informed consent process. Using this ethical framework, we show that the College statement does not provide adequate guidance to obstetricians in fulfilling their ethical obligations in the informed consent process with pregnant women who express an interest in, or preference for planned home birth. Obstetricians have an ethical obligation to disclose the increased risks of perinatal and neonatal mortality and morbidity from planned home birth in the context of American healthcare and should recommend against it. Obstetricians should recommend hospital-based delivery and respond to refusal of these recommendations with respectful persuasion. As a matter of beneficence-based professional integrity, obstetricians should not participate in planned home birth. At the same time, obstetricians have a beneficence-based obligation to continue to provide prenatal and emergency obstetric care. The obstetric profession should continuously strive to make hospital births more humane and support home-birth-like environments in the hospital as well as continuously improve safety for both pregnant and fetal patients.
美国妇产科医师学会(委员会意见),“计划在家分娩”,援引了产科伦理学的两个核心概念,即妇女有权在知情的情况下对分娩做出医学决定,以及知情同意过程。我们提出了一个产科伦理学框架,通过关注在基于受益的临床判断中,何时应该提供、推荐和反对在知情同意过程中的临床管理,从而增强孕妇的自主性。使用这个伦理框架,我们表明,该声明并没有为产科医生在向表达对计划在家分娩感兴趣或偏好的孕妇提供知情同意过程中履行其伦理义务提供足够的指导。产科医生有道德义务在美国家庭医疗保健背景下披露计划在家分娩的围产期和新生儿死亡率和发病率增加的风险,并建议反对这种分娩方式。产科医生应该建议在医院分娩,并对拒绝这些建议做出尊重性的说服。作为基于受益的专业诚信问题,产科医生不应该参与计划在家分娩。同时,产科医生有基于受益的义务继续提供产前和紧急产科护理。产科专业应该不断努力使医院分娩更加人性化,并在医院中支持类似于家庭分娩的环境,同时不断提高孕妇和胎儿患者的安全性。