U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2013 Oct;63(10):1163-72. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.804464.
Quantifying non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) from animal feeding operations (AFOs) is challenging due to the broad spectrum of compounds and the polar nature of the most abundant compounds. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of commercial NMHC analyzers for measuring volatile organic compounds (VOCs) commonly emitted from AFOs. Three different NMHC analyzers were tested for response to laboratory generated VOCs, and two were tested in the field at a commercial poultry facility. The NMHC analyzers tested included gas chromatography/flame ionization detector (GC/FID), photoacoustic infrared (PA-IR) and photoionization detector (PID). The GC/FID NHHC analyzer was linear in response to nonpolar compounds, but detector response to polar oxygenated compounds were lower than expected due to poor peak shape on the column. The PA-IR NMHC instrument responded well to the calibration standard (propane), methanol, and acetone, but it performed poorly with larger alcohols and ketones and acetonitrile. The PA-IR response varied between compounds in similar compound classes. The PID responded poorly to many of the most abundant VOCs at AFOs, and it underreported alcohols by > 70%. In the field monitoring study, total NMHC concentrations were calculated from sum total of VOC determined using EPA Methods TO-15 and TO-17 with GC-MS compared to results from NMHC analyzers. NMHC GC/FID values were greater than the values calculated from the individual compound measurements. This indicated the presence of small hydrocarbons not measured with TO-15 or TO-17 such as propane. The PA-IR response was variable, but it was always lower than the GC/FID response. Results suggest that improved approaches are needed to accurately determine the VOC profile and NMHC emission rates from AFOs.
量化来自动物饲养场(AFO)的非甲烷碳氢化合物(NMHC)具有挑战性,因为化合物种类繁多,且最丰富的化合物具有极性。本研究的目的是确定商业 NMHC 分析仪在测量通常从 AFO 排放的挥发性有机化合物(VOC)方面的性能。测试了三种不同的 NMHC 分析仪对实验室产生的 VOC 的响应,其中两种在商业家禽养殖场进行了现场测试。测试的 NMHC 分析仪包括气相色谱/火焰电离检测器(GC/FID)、光声红外(PA-IR)和光电离检测器(PID)。GC/FID NMHC 分析仪对非极性化合物的响应呈线性,但由于柱上峰形不佳,对极性含氧化合物的检测器响应低于预期。PA-IR NMHC 仪器对校准标准(丙烷)、甲醇和丙酮的响应良好,但对较大的醇和酮以及乙腈的响应较差。PA-IR 的响应在同类化合物中有所不同。PID 对 AFO 中许多最丰富的 VOC 的响应较差,而且它对醇的报告值低了>70%。在现场监测研究中,总 NMHC 浓度是根据使用 EPA 方法 TO-15 和 TO-17 与 GC-MS 确定的 VOC 总和计算得出的,与 NMHC 分析仪的结果进行了比较。NMHC GC/FID 值大于从单个化合物测量计算得出的值。这表明存在未被 TO-15 或 TO-17 测量的小烃类物质,例如丙烷。PA-IR 的响应是可变的,但总是低于 GC/FID 的响应。结果表明,需要改进方法来准确确定 AFO 的 VOC 特征和 NMHC 排放速率。