Université de Lille Nord de France, F-59000 Lille, France.
J Chromatogr A. 2009 Dec 4;1216(49):8642-51. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.10.018. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
Few studies were conducted on oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOC) because of problems encountered during the sampling/analyzing steps induced by water in sampled air. Consequently, there is a lack of knowledge of their spatial and temporal trends and their origins in ambient air. In this study, an analyzer consisted of a thermal desorber (TD) interfaced with a gas chromatograph (GC) and a flame ionization detector (FID) was developed for online measurements of 18 OVOC in ambient air including 4 alcohols, 6 aldehydes, 3 ketones, 3 ethers, 2 esters and 4 nitriles. The main difficulty was to overcome the humidity effect without loss of compounds. Water amount in the sampled air was reduced by the trap composition (two hydrophobic graphitized carbons-Carbopack B:Carbopack X), the trap temperature (held at 12.5 degrees C), by diluting (50:50) the sample with dry air before the preconcentration step and a trap purge with helium. Humidity management allowed the use of a polar CP-Lowox column in order to separate the polar compounds from the hydrocarbon/aromatic matrix. The safe sampling volume for the dual-sorbent trap 75 mg Carbopack X:5mg Carbopack B was found to 405 mL for ethanol by analyzing a standard mixture at a relative humidity of 80%. Detection limits ranging from 10 ppt for ETBE to 90 ppt for ethanol were obtained for 18 compounds for a sampling volume of 405 mL. Good repeatabilities were obtained at two levels of concentration (relative standard deviation <5%). The calibration (ranging from 0.5 to 10 ppb) was set up at three different levels of relative humidity to test the humidity effect on the response coefficients. Results showed that the response coefficients of all compounds were less affected by humidity except for those of ethanol and acetonitrile (decrease respectively of 30% and 20%). The target compounds analysis shows good reproducibility with response coefficient variability of less then 10% of the mean initial value of calibration for all the compounds. Hourly ambient air measurements were conducted in an urban site in order to test this method. On the basis of these measurements, ethanol, acetone and acetaldehyde have shown the highest concentration levels with an average of 2.10, 1.75 and 1.37 ppb respectively. The daily evolution of some OVOC, namely ethanol and acetaldehyde, was attributed to emissions from motor vehicles while acetone has a different temporal evolution that can be probably associated with remote sources.
这项研究开发了一种由热脱附(TD)与气相色谱(GC)和火焰离子化检测器(FID)组成的分析仪,用于在线测量环境空气中的 18 种挥发性有机化合物(OVOC),包括 4 种醇类、6 种醛类、3 种酮类、3 种醚类、2 种酯类和 4 种腈类。主要的困难是在不损失化合物的情况下克服湿度的影响。通过捕集器的组成(两种疏水性石墨化碳-Carbopack B:Carbopack X)、捕集器温度(保持在 12.5°C)、在预浓缩前用干燥空气将样品稀释(50:50)以及氦气吹扫来减少采样空气中的水分。湿度管理允许使用极性 CP-Lowox 柱,以便将极性化合物与烃/芳烃基质分离。通过分析相对湿度为 80%的标准混合物,发现双吸附剂捕集器 75mg Carbopack X:5mg Carbopack B 的安全采样体积对于乙醇为 405mL。对于 405mL 的采样体积,18 种化合物的检测限范围为 ETBE 的 10ppt 至乙醇的 90ppt。在两个浓度水平(相对标准偏差 <5%)下获得了良好的重复性。在三个不同的相对湿度水平上设置了校准(范围从 0.5 到 10ppb),以测试湿度对响应系数的影响。结果表明,除乙醇和乙腈外,所有化合物的响应系数受湿度影响较小(分别下降了 30%和 20%)。目标化合物分析显示,所有化合物的响应系数变化均小于校准初始平均值的 10%,具有良好的重现性。在城市地区进行了小时环境空气测量,以测试该方法。基于这些测量结果,乙醇、丙酮和乙醛的浓度最高,平均值分别为 2.10、1.75 和 1.37ppb。一些 OVOC(如乙醇和乙醛)的日变化归因于机动车排放,而丙酮具有不同的时间变化,可能与远程来源有关。