• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喷雾微酸性电解水降低蛋鸡舍空气中细菌数量。

Airborne bacterial reduction by spraying slightly acidic electrolyzed water in a laying-hen house.

机构信息

College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2013 Oct;63(10):1205-11. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.812815.

DOI:10.1080/10962247.2013.812815
PMID:24282973
Abstract

Spraying slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) has been considered as a potential approach to reduce airborne bacteria in laying-hen houses. In this study, the effects of spraying SAEW on airborne bacterial reduction were investigated in a laying-hen house as compared with using diluted didecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide (DDAB). Averaged air temperature reduced by approximate 1 degrees C and average relative humidity increased by 3% at a stable ventilation rate (about 2.5 m3 hr(-1) per bird) in the laying-hen house 30 min after spraying (120 mL m(-2)). Compared with the control without spraying, the airborne bacterial concentration was reduced by about 0.70 and 0.37 log10 colony-forming units (CFU) m(-3) in the 4 hr after spraying 120 mL m(-2) SAEW (available chlorine concentration [ACC] of 156 mg L(-1)) and diluted DDAB (active compound concentration of 167 mg L(-1)), respectively. Compared with spraying diluted DDAB, spraying SAEW was determined to be more effective for reducing airborne bacterial in laying-hen houses. The effects of spraying SAEW and diluted DDAB on airborne bacterial reduction in the laying-hen house increased with the increasing available chlorine concentrations for SAEW (156, 206, 262 mg L(-1)) and increasing active compound concentrations for diluted DDAB (167, 333, 500 mg L(-1)), respectively. Spraying SAEW and diluted DDAB with two levels of spraying volumes (120 and 90 mL m(-2)) both showed significant differences on airborne bacterial reduction in the laying-hen house (P < 0.05).

摘要

喷洒微酸性电解水(SAEW)已被认为是减少产蛋鸡舍空气中细菌的一种潜在方法。在这项研究中,与使用稀释的双癸基二甲基氯化铵(DDAB)相比,研究了在产蛋鸡舍中喷洒 SAEW 对空气中细菌减少的影响。在稳定的通风率(约每只鸡 2.5 立方米/小时)下,喷洒后 30 分钟,鸡舍内平均空气温度降低约 1 摄氏度,平均相对湿度增加 3%(喷洒 120 毫升/平方米)。与未喷洒的对照相比,喷洒 120 毫升/平方米的 SAEW(有效氯浓度[ACC]为 156 毫克/升)和稀释的 DDAB(有效化合物浓度为 167 毫克/升)后 4 小时,空气中的细菌浓度分别降低了约 0.70 和 0.37 对数 10 菌落形成单位(CFU)/立方米。与喷洒稀释的 DDAB 相比,喷洒 SAEW 被确定为更有效地减少产蛋鸡舍中的空气中细菌。喷洒 SAEW 和稀释的 DDAB 对产蛋鸡舍中空气中细菌减少的影响随着 SAEW 的有效氯浓度(156、206、262 毫克/升)和稀释的 DDAB 的有效化合物浓度(167、333、500 毫克/升)的增加而增加。以两种喷洒量(120 和 90 毫升/平方米)喷洒 SAEW 和稀释的 DDAB 均对产蛋鸡舍中的空气中细菌减少有显著差异(P < 0.05)。

相似文献

1
Airborne bacterial reduction by spraying slightly acidic electrolyzed water in a laying-hen house.喷雾微酸性电解水降低蛋鸡舍空气中细菌数量。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2013 Oct;63(10):1205-11. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.812815.
2
Slightly acidic electrolyzed water for reducing airborne microorganisms in a layer breeding house.微酸性电解水对层架式育雏舍空气微生物的降低作用
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2014 Apr;64(4):494-500. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.870940.
3
Optimization of a wet scrubber with electrolyzed water spray-Part II: Airborne culturable bacteria removal.采用电解水喷雾的湿式洗涤器优化 - 第二部分:空气中可培养细菌的去除。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019 May;69(5):603-610. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1567622. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
4
Reduction of microbial contamination on the surfaces of layer houses using slightly acidic electrolyzed water.使用微酸性电解水减少蛋鸡舍表面的微生物污染
Poult Sci. 2015 Nov;94(11):2838-48. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev261. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
5
Free chlorine loss during spraying of membraneless acidic electrolyzed water and its antimicrobial effect on airborne bacteria from poultry house.无隔膜酸性电解水喷雾过程中游离氯的损失及其对禽舍空气中细菌的抗菌作用。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(2):249-55. doi: 10.5604/1232-1966.1108585.
6
Spatial disinfection potential of slightly acidic electrolyzed water.微酸性电解水的空间消毒潜力。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 2;16(7):e0253595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253595. eCollection 2021.
7
Disinfection effectiveness of slightly acidic electrolysed water in swine barns.微酸性电解水在猪圈中的消毒效果。
J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Sep;115(3):703-10. doi: 10.1111/jam.12274. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
8
Application of slightly acidic electrolyzed water for decontamination of stainless steel surfaces in animal transport vehicles.微酸性电解水在动物运输车辆不锈钢表面去污中的应用。
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Oct 1;133:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
9
Application of slightly acidic electrolyzed water for inactivating microbes in a layer breeding house.微酸性电解水在层架式育雏舍中对微生物的灭活效果。
Poult Sci. 2013 Oct;92(10):2560-6. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03117.
10
Efficiency of slightly acidic electrolyzed water for inactivation of Salmonella enteritidis and its contaminated shell eggs.弱酸性电解水对肠炎沙门氏菌及其污染的带壳蛋的灭活效果
Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Mar 31;130(2):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.021. Epub 2008 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects and health risk assessments of different spray disinfectants on microbial aerosols in chicken houses.不同喷雾消毒剂对鸡舍微生物气溶胶的影响及健康风险评估
Poult Sci. 2025 May;104(5):105083. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105083. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
2
Kinetics of sterilization of atomized slightly acidic electrolyzed water on tableware.雾化微酸性电解水对餐具的杀菌动力学
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 15;10(2):e24721. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24721. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
3
Optimization and Effect of Water Hardness for the Production of Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water on Sanitization Efficacy.
用于生产微酸性电解水的水硬度对消毒效果的优化及影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 2;13:816671. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.816671. eCollection 2022.
4
Electrolyzed Water and Its Pharmacological Activities: A Mini-Review.电解水及其药理活性:综述
Molecules. 2022 Feb 11;27(4):1222. doi: 10.3390/molecules27041222.
5
Effectiveness of slightly acidic electrolyzed water on bacteria reduction: in vitro and spray evaluation.弱酸性电解水对细菌减少的有效性:体外及喷雾评估
PeerJ. 2020 Feb 18;8:e8593. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8593. eCollection 2020.