a College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering , China Agricultural University , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
b Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment , Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019 May;69(5):603-610. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1567622. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
Airborne microorganisms, especially the pathogenic microorganisms, emitted from animal feeding operations (AFOs) may harm the environment and public health and threaten the biosecurity of the farm and surrounding environment. Electrolyzed water (EW), which was considered to be an environmentally friendly disinfectant, may be a potential spraying medium of wet scrubber for airborne microorganism emission reduction. A laboratory test was conducted to investigate the airborne bacteria (CB) removal efficiency of the wet scrubber by EW spray with different designs and operating parameters. Both the available choline (AC) initial loss rate and AC traveling loss rate of acidic electrolyzed water (AEW; pH = 1.35) were much higher than those of slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW; pH = 5.50). Using one spraying stage with 4 m sec air speed in the duct, the no detect lines (NDLs) of SAEW (pH = 5.50) for airborne Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella enteritidis removal were all 50 mg L, whereas the NDLs of AEW (pH = 1.35) for airborne E. coli, S. aureus, and S. enteritidis removal increased to 70, 90, and 90 mg L, respectively. The NDLs of SAEW (pH = 5.50) for airborne E. coli, S. aureus, and S. enteritidis were lower than those of AEW (pH = 1.35) at single spraying stage. Increase in the number of stages lowered the NDLs of both SAEW (pH = 5.50) and AEW (pH = 1.35) for airborne E. coli, S. aureus, and S. enteritidis. EW with a higher available chlorine concentration (ACC) was needed at air speed of 6 m sec to reach the same airborne CB removal efficiency as that at air speed of 4 m sec. The results of this study demonstrated that EW spray wet scrubbers could be a very effective and feasible airborne CB mitigation technology for AFOs. Implications: It is difficult to effectively reduce airborne bacteria emitted from animal feeding operations (AFOs). Electrolyzed water (EW) with disinfection effect and acidity is a potential absorbent for spray in wet scrubber to remove microorganisms and ammonia. Based on the field test results, a laboratory experiment we conducted this time was to optimize the design and operation parameters to improve the airborne bacteria removal efficiency. A better understanding of the EW application in the wet scrubber can contribute to the mitigation of airborne bacteria from animal houses and improve the atmosphere air quality.
空气中的微生物,特别是来自动物饲养场(AFO)的致病性微生物,可能会危害环境和公共健康,并威胁农场和周围环境的生物安全。电解水(EW)被认为是一种环保型消毒剂,可能是减少空气中微生物排放的湿式洗涤器的潜在喷雾介质。进行了一项实验室测试,以研究不同设计和操作参数的 EW 喷雾对湿式洗涤器去除空气中细菌(CB)的效率。酸性电解水(AEW;pH = 1.35)的可用胆碱(AC)初始损失率和 AC 迁移损失率均远高于微酸性电解水(SAEW;pH = 5.50)。在管道中使用 4 m sec 空气速度的一个喷雾阶段,SAEW(pH = 5.50)对空气中大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和肠炎沙门氏菌去除的不可检测线(NDL)均为 50 mg L,而 AEW(pH = 1.35)对空气中大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和肠炎沙门氏菌去除的 NDL 分别增加到 70、90 和 90 mg L。在单个喷雾阶段,SAEW(pH = 5.50)对空气中大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和肠炎沙门氏菌的 NDL 低于 AEW(pH = 1.35)。增加阶段数降低了 SAEW(pH = 5.50)和 AEW(pH = 1.35)对空气中大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和肠炎沙门氏菌的 NDL。在 6 m sec 的空气速度下,需要具有更高有效氯浓度(ACC)的 EW 才能达到与 4 m sec 空气速度相同的空气中 CB 去除效率。本研究结果表明,EW 喷雾湿式洗涤器可能是 AFO 非常有效且可行的空气中 CB 缓解技术。影响:很难有效减少来自动物饲养场(AFO)的空气中细菌的排放。具有消毒效果和酸度的电解水(EW)是喷雾在湿式洗涤器中去除微生物和氨的潜在吸收剂。基于现场测试结果,我们这次进行的实验室实验旨在优化设计和操作参数,以提高空气中细菌的去除效率。更好地了解 EW 在湿式洗涤器中的应用可以有助于减轻动物房屋中的空气中细菌,并改善大气空气质量。