1] Krembil Neuroscience Center, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada [2] Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
1] Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada [2] Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Apr;39(5):1270-81. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.330. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
Recently, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been evaluated as an experimental therapy for treatment-resistant depression. Although there have been encouraging results in open-label trials, about half of the patients fail to achieve meaningful benefit. Although progress has been made in understanding the neurobiology of MDD, the ability to characterize differences in brain dynamics between those who do and do not benefit from DBS is lacking. In this study, we investigated EEG resting-state data recorded from 12 patients that have undergone DBS surgery. Of those, six patients were classified as responders to DBS, defined as an improvement of 50% or more on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17). We compared hemispheric frontal theta and parietal alpha power asymmetry and synchronization asymmetry between responders and non-responders. Hemispheric power asymmetry showed statistically significant differences between responders and non-responders with healthy controls showing an asymmetry similar to responders but opposite to non-responders. This asymmetry was characterized by an increase in frontal theta in the right hemisphere relative to the left combined with an increase in parietal alpha in the left hemisphere relative to the right in non-responders compared with responders. Hemispheric mean synchronization asymmetry showed a statistically significant difference between responders and non-responders in the theta band, with healthy controls showing an asymmetry similar to responders but opposite to non-responders. This asymmetry resulted from an increase in frontal synchronization in the right hemisphere relative to the left combined with an increase in parietal synchronization in the left hemisphere relative to the right in non-responders compared with responders. Connectivity diagrams revealed long-range differences in frontal/central-parietal connectivity between the two groups in the theta band. This pattern was observed irrespective of whether EEG data were collected with active DBS or with the DBS stimulation turned off, suggesting stable functional and possibly structural modifications that may be attributed to plasticity.
最近,深部脑刺激(DBS)已被评估为治疗抵抗性抑郁症的实验性治疗方法。尽管开放性试验中取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但仍有约一半的患者未能获得有意义的益处。尽管在理解 MDD 的神经生物学方面取得了进展,但缺乏能够描述 DBS 获益与不获益患者之间大脑动态差异的能力。在这项研究中,我们研究了已接受 DBS 手术的 12 名患者的 EEG 静息态数据。其中,6 名患者被归类为 DBS 反应者,定义为汉密尔顿抑郁量表 17 项(HAMD-17)评分改善 50%或以上。我们比较了反应者和无反应者之间的额部 theta 和顶叶 alpha 功率不对称和同步不对称。半球间功率不对称在反应者和无反应者与健康对照组之间存在统计学显著差异,健康对照组表现出与反应者相似但与无反应者相反的不对称性。这种不对称性的特征是无反应者右半球的额部 theta 增加,而左半球的顶叶 alpha 增加,与反应者相比,无反应者的左半球相对右半球增加。在 theta 频段,半球间平均同步不对称在反应者和无反应者之间存在统计学显著差异,健康对照组表现出与反应者相似但与无反应者相反的不对称性。这种不对称性是由于无反应者右半球的额部同步增加,而左半球的顶叶同步增加,与反应者相比,无反应者的左半球相对右半球增加。连接图显示了在 theta 频段,两组之间额部/中央顶叶连接的长程差异。这种模式无论 EEG 数据是在 DBS 刺激开启还是关闭的情况下收集,都可以观察到,这表明存在稳定的功能和可能的结构改变,这些改变可能归因于可塑性。