• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能连接强度对预测重度抑郁症治疗反应的意义:一项静息态 EEG 研究。

The implication of functional connectivity strength in predicting treatment response of major depressive disorder: a resting EEG study.

机构信息

Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2011 Dec 30;194(3):372-377. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.02.009
PMID:22041534
Abstract

Predicting treatment response in major depressive disorder (MDD) has been an important clinical issue given that the initial intent-to-treat response rate is only 50 to 60%. This study was designed to examine whether functional connectivity strengths of resting EEG could be potential biomarkers in predicting treatment response at 8 weeks of treatment. Resting state 3-min eyes-closed EEG activity was recorded at baseline and compared in 108 depressed patients. All patients were being treated with selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors. Baseline coherence and power series correlation were compared between responders and non-responders evaluated at the 8th week by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Pearson correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were applied to evaluate the performance of connectivity strengths in predicting/classifying treatment responses. The connectivity strengths of right fronto-temporal network at delta/theta frequencies differentiated responders and non-responders at the 8th week of treatment, such that the stronger the connectivity strengths, the poorer the treatment response. ROC analyses supported the value of these measures in classifying responders/non-responders. Our results suggest that fronto-temporal connectivity strengths could be potential biomarkers to differentiate responders and slow responders or non-responders in MDD.

摘要

预测重度抑郁症(MDD)的治疗反应一直是一个重要的临床问题,因为初始意向治疗反应率仅为 50%至 60%。本研究旨在探讨静息 EEG 的功能连接强度是否可以作为预测治疗 8 周反应的潜在生物标志物。在基线时记录了 108 名抑郁症患者的 3 分钟闭眼静息 EEG 活动,并进行了比较。所有患者均接受选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗。通过汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表在第 8 周评估应答者和无应答者,并比较基线相干性和功率级数相关性。应用 Pearson 相关和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估连接强度在预测/分类治疗反应中的性能。在治疗的第 8 周,右侧额颞网络的连接强度可区分应答者和无应答者,连接强度越强,治疗反应越差。ROC 分析支持这些措施在分类应答者/无应答者方面的价值。我们的研究结果表明,额颞连接强度可能是区分 MDD 中应答者和缓慢应答者或无应答者的潜在生物标志物。

相似文献

1
The implication of functional connectivity strength in predicting treatment response of major depressive disorder: a resting EEG study.功能连接强度对预测重度抑郁症治疗反应的意义:一项静息态 EEG 研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Dec 30;194(3):372-377. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
2
EEG connectivity between the subgenual anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in response to antidepressant medication.膝下前扣带回与前额叶皮质之间的脑电图连接性对抗抑郁药物的反应。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017 Apr;27(4):301-312. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
3
Pre-treatment EEG signal variability is associated with treatment success in depression.预处理 EEG 信号变异性与抑郁症的治疗效果相关。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Oct 31;17:368-377. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.035. eCollection 2018.
4
Functional connectivity in major depression: increased phase synchronization between frontal cortical EEG-source estimates.重度抑郁症的功能连接:额皮质 EEG 源估计之间相位同步增加。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Apr 30;222(1-2):91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
5
Differentiating responders and non-responders to rTMS treatment for depression after one week using resting EEG connectivity measures.使用静息态 EEG 连接测量在一周后区分 rTMS 治疗抑郁症的反应者和非反应者。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 1;242:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.058. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
6
The comparative effectiveness of electroencephalographic indices in predicting response to escitalopram therapy in depression: A pilot study.脑电图指标在预测抑郁症患者对依地普仑治疗反应中的比较效果:一项初步研究。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:542-549. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
7
CNS- and ANS-arousal predict response to antidepressant medication: Findings from the randomized iSPOT-D study.中枢神经系统和自主神经系统的唤醒可预测对抗抑郁药物的反应:来自随机iSPOT-D研究的结果。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Feb;73:108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
8
Frontal and rostral anterior cingulate (rACC) theta EEG in depression: implications for treatment outcome?抑郁患者额前和额前扣带回(rACC)θ 脑电:对治疗效果的影响?
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Aug;25(8):1190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
9
Responders to rTMS for depression show increased fronto-midline theta and theta connectivity compared to non-responders.接受 rTMS 治疗的抑郁症患者与非应答者相比,额中线theta 波和 theta 波连接增加。
Brain Stimul. 2018 Jan-Feb;11(1):190-203. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.015. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
10
EEG power asymmetry and functional connectivity as a marker of treatment effectiveness in DBS surgery for depression.脑电功率不对称和功能连接作为抑郁症脑深部电刺激手术治疗效果的标志物。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Apr;39(5):1270-81. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.330. Epub 2013 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative and qualitative electroencephalography in the diagnosis and monitoring of depression. A modern approach to clinical neurophysiology.定量与定性脑电图在抑郁症诊断与监测中的应用。临床神经生理学的现代方法。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Aug 8;19:1624434. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1624434. eCollection 2025.
2
One size does not fit all: notable individual variation in brain activity correlates of antidepressant treatment response.一刀切并不适用于所有人:抗抑郁治疗反应的大脑活动相关性存在显著个体差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 2;15:1358018. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1358018. eCollection 2024.
3
Technical and clinical considerations for electroencephalography-based biomarkers for major depressive disorder.
基于脑电图的重度抑郁症生物标志物的技术与临床考量
Npj Ment Health Res. 2023 Oct 25;2(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s44184-023-00038-7.
4
Fractal Analysis of Electrophysiological Signals to Detect and Monitor Depression: What We Know So Far?分形分析电生理信号以检测和监测抑郁症:迄今为止我们了解多少?
Adv Neurobiol. 2024;36:677-692. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-47606-8_34.
5
Enhanced low-gamma band power in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex in a rat model of depression is reversed by orexin-1 receptor antagonism.在抑郁症大鼠模型中,海马体和前额叶皮质增强的低γ波段功率通过食欲素-1受体拮抗作用得以逆转。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;15:386-394. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.11.006. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Machine Learning Techniques Reveal Aberrated Multidimensional EEG Characteristics in Patients with Depression.机器学习技术揭示抑郁症患者异常的多维脑电图特征。
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 22;13(3):384. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030384.
7
Classification of Depression Through Resting-State Electroencephalogram as a Novel Practice in Psychiatry: Review.通过静息态脑电图对抑郁症进行分类作为精神病学中的一种新实践:综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 3;22(11):e19548. doi: 10.2196/19548.
8
The Reason Why rTMS and tDCS Are Efficient in Treatments of Depression.重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗抑郁症有效的原因。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 13;10:2923. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02923. eCollection 2019.
9
The study evaluating the effect of probiotic supplementation on the mental status, inflammation, and intestinal barrier in major depressive disorder patients using gluten-free or gluten-containing diet (SANGUT study): a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical study protocol.评估补充益生菌对无麸质或含麸质饮食的重度抑郁症患者精神状态、炎症和肠道屏障影响的研究(SANGUT 研究):一项为期 12 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床研究方案。
Nutr J. 2019 Aug 31;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12937-019-0475-x.
10
Neuronal connectivity in major depressive disorder: a systematic review.重度抑郁症中的神经元连接:一项系统综述。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Oct 17;14:2715-2737. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S170989. eCollection 2018.