• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[体重指数对机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术结局的影响:一项比较性回顾性研究]

[Influence of body mass index on the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study].

作者信息

Menzella D, Thubert T, Joubert M, Lauratet B, Kouchner P, Lefranc J-P

机构信息

Service de chirurgie générale viscérale endocrinienne et gynécologique, groupe hospitalier La Pitié-Salpétrière, AP-HP, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France.

出版信息

Prog Urol. 2013 Dec;23(17):1482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.08.327. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2013.08.327
PMID:24286549
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on a robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (RALS) to treat genital prolapse.

METHODOLOGY

The study focused on a group of 56 women who went through a robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (RALS) between 2009 and 2013. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their BMI (kg/m(2)): BMI<25 (n=28), 25≤BMI<30 (n=16), BMI≥30 (n=12). The operating parameters, results and short-term complications were analysed according to the patients' BMI.

RESULTS

The median BMI was 22.5kg/m(2) in group 1, 26.1kg/m(2) in group 2, and 31.6kg/m(2) in group 3 (P<0.001). The operation time was respectively 250 minutes (130-380), 230 minutes (150-410) and 255 minutes (170-370), for groups 1, 2 and 3 (P=0.689). The 3 groups spent 4 days in the hospital (P=0.562). Only one laparotomy in group 3 was reported (P=0.214). The rate of early complications was similar in groups 1, 2 and 3 with 3/28, 0/16 and 0/12 respectively. Anatomical short-term results were identical in the 3 groups with a satisfactory anatomical correction in 100% of all cases (ICS POP-Q<2).

CONCLUSION

In this small group, we observed that the BMI had no impact neither on the operation time nor on the rate of complication.

摘要

目的

我们研究的目的是评估体重指数(BMI)对机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术(RALS)治疗生殖器脱垂的影响。

方法

该研究聚焦于2009年至2013年间接受机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术(RALS)的56名女性。根据患者的BMI(kg/m²)将患者分为3组:BMI<25(n = 28),25≤BMI<30(n = 16),BMI≥30(n = 12)。根据患者的BMI分析手术参数、结果和短期并发症。

结果

第1组的中位BMI为22.5kg/m²,第2组为26.1kg/m²,第3组为31.6kg/m²(P<0.001)。第1、2和3组的手术时间分别为250分钟(130 - 380)、230分钟(150 - 410)和255分钟(170 - 370)(P = 0.689)。3组患者的住院时间均为4天(P = 0.562)。仅第3组报告了1例剖腹手术(P = 0.214)。第1、2和3组的早期并发症发生率相似,分别为3/28、0/16和0/12。3组的解剖学短期结果相同,所有病例中有100%的解剖学矫正结果令人满意(国际尿控学会盆腔器官脱垂定量分期系统(ICS POP-Q)<2)。

结论

在这个小样本中,我们观察到BMI对手术时间和并发症发生率均无影响。

相似文献

1
[Influence of body mass index on the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study].[体重指数对机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术结局的影响:一项比较性回顾性研究]
Prog Urol. 2013 Dec;23(17):1482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.08.327. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
2
Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.肥胖女性中单纯腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术功能结局的比较。
Prog Urol. 2014 Dec;24(17):1106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2014.09.045. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
3
[Preliminary study on the feasibility of robot-assisted double mesh sacrocolpopexy in comparison to the laparoscopic approach].机器人辅助双网片骶骨阴道固定术与腹腔镜手术相比的可行性初步研究
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Oct;42(6):570-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
4
Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique.机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨子宫固定术在盆腔器官脱垂中保留子宫:生活质量和技术。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Nov;165(1):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.025. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
5
Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.体重指数对机器人辅助全腹腔镜子宫切除术的影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
6
[Double spinofixation laparoscopic versus laparoscopic robot-assisted: Morbidity, anatomical and functional short-term results].[双节段脊柱固定术:腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的比较:发病率、解剖学及功能短期结果]
Prog Urol. 2011 Jul;21(7):473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
7
Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗重度阴道穹窿脱垂的长期疗效
J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.040.
8
[Robotic-assisted surgery in urogynecology--our experience with the first 100 cases: experience from a single institution].[妇科泌尿学中的机器人辅助手术——我们的前100例经验:来自单一机构的经验]
Harefuah. 2014 Aug;153(8):448-52, 499.
9
The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术的现状:综述
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1089-103. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.048. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
10
Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse.机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂
J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):655-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0290.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic vs. robotic sacrocolpopexy: influence of age, BMI, and parity on perioperative outcomes.腹腔镜与机器人骶骨阴道固定术:年龄、体重指数和产次对围手术期结局的影响。
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 29;12:1625404. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1625404. eCollection 2025.
2
Retrospective analysis of apical prolapse correction by unilateral pectineal suspension: perioperative and short-term results.经单侧耻骨悬吊术治疗的顶端脱垂矫正的回顾性分析:围手术期和短期结果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Aug;34(8):1877-1884. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05479-4. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
3
What Is the Effect of Body Mass Index on Subjective Outcome Following Vaginal Hysterectomy for Prolapse?
体重指数对脱垂性阴道子宫切除术后主观结果有何影响?
Int Neurourol J. 2019 Jun;23(2):136-143. doi: 10.5213/inj.1938016.008. Epub 2019 Jun 30.