• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与机器人骶骨阴道固定术:年龄、体重指数和产次对围手术期结局的影响。

Laparoscopic vs. robotic sacrocolpopexy: influence of age, BMI, and parity on perioperative outcomes.

作者信息

Strauss Mila, Kennes Lieven N, Dombrowski Janina, Stickeler Elmar, Gräf Charlotte, Lube Katharina, Hillmeyer Alessia, Najjari Laila

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Department of Economics and Business Administration, University of Applied Sciences Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2025 Aug 29;12:1625404. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1625404. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1625404
PMID:40949780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12427780/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy are established techniques for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair, but their performance in patients with higher age, BMI, and parity remains underexplored.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, we analyzed 162 women undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy between 2010 and 2023:  = 104 via laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and  = 58 via robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC). Patients were included if they had symptomatic or asymptomatic POP stage II or higher. Primary outcomes were surgical duration and length of postoperative hospital stay; secondary outcomes included intra- and postoperative complications. Regression analyses were used to assess the influence of age, BMI, and number of births.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 64 ± 11.2 years. Surgical duration increased significantly with BMI (+2.82 min/unit, 95% CI: 0.50, 5.14,  = 0.0177) and parity (+9.8 min/birth, CI: 0.56, 19.14,  = 0.0379) in the LSC group, but not significantly in RASC (Surgical duration: (+2.00 min/unit, 95% CI: -0.53, 4.63,  = 0.1167; parity: + 8.7 min/birth, 95% CI: 0.50, 5.14,  = 0.0698). Postoperative stay was significantly prolonged with higher age (95% CI = 0.006, 0.057,  = 0.0152), BMI (95% CI = 0.019, 0.154,  = 0.0130), and number of vaginal births (95% CI = 0.008, 0.59,  = 0.01) in LSC, while these associations were attenuated in RASC (age: 95% CI: -0.0213, 0.0249,  = 0.876; BMI: -95% CI: -0.038, 0.060,  = 0.667; vaginal birth: 95% CI = 0.10, 0.44,  = 0.003). Overall complication rates exhibited no measurable difference between the groups (LSC 18%, RASC 19%). Complications were more frequent with fixation at the vaginal vault than the cervix.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy appears to offer greater procedural consistency in patients with advanced age, obesity, and higher parity. These findings support the selective use of robotic assistance in anatomically or clinically complex cases and add to the limited evidence guiding personalized surgical planning in POP repair.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜和机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术是治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的成熟技术,但它们在年龄较大、体重指数(BMI)较高和多产的患者中的表现仍未得到充分研究。

方法

在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们分析了2010年至2023年间接受微创骶骨阴道固定术的162名女性:104例通过腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术(LSC),58例通过机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术(RASC)。有症状或无症状的POP II期或更高分期的患者被纳入研究。主要结局指标为手术时间和术后住院时间;次要结局指标包括术中及术后并发症。采用回归分析评估年龄、BMI和分娩次数的影响。

结果

患者平均年龄为64±11.2岁。在LSC组中,手术时间随BMI(+2.82分钟/单位,95%可信区间:0.50,5.14,P = 0.0177)和分娩次数(+9.8分钟/次分娩,可信区间:0.56,19.14,P = 0.0379)显著增加,但在RASC组中无显著增加(手术时间:+2.00分钟/单位,95%可信区间:-0.53,4.63,P = 0.1167;分娩次数:+8.7分钟/次分娩,95%可信区间:0.50,5.14,P = 0.0698)。在LSC组中,术后住院时间随年龄增加(95%可信区间 = 0.006,0.057,P = 0.0152)、BMI增加(95%可信区间 = 0.019,0.154,P = 0.0130)和阴道分娩次数增加(95%可信区间 = 0.008,0.59,P = 0.01)而显著延长,而在RASC组中这些关联减弱(年龄:95%可信区间:-0.0213,0.0249,P = 0.876;BMI:-95%可信区间:-0.038,0.060,P = 0.667;阴道分娩:95%可信区间 = 0.10,0.44,P = 0.003)。两组总体并发症发生率无显著差异(LSC组18%,RASC组19%)。阴道穹窿固定术的并发症比宫颈固定术更常见。

结论

机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术在高龄、肥胖和多产患者中似乎具有更高的手术一致性。这些发现支持在解剖学或临床复杂病例中选择性使用机器人辅助,并为POP修复中指导个性化手术规划的有限证据增添了内容。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a958/12427780/9b5193ed10fe/fsurg-12-1625404-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a958/12427780/711301f0ef22/fsurg-12-1625404-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a958/12427780/30548e74f1df/fsurg-12-1625404-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a958/12427780/9b5193ed10fe/fsurg-12-1625404-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a958/12427780/711301f0ef22/fsurg-12-1625404-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a958/12427780/30548e74f1df/fsurg-12-1625404-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a958/12427780/9b5193ed10fe/fsurg-12-1625404-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic vs. robotic sacrocolpopexy: influence of age, BMI, and parity on perioperative outcomes.腹腔镜与机器人骶骨阴道固定术:年龄、体重指数和产次对围手术期结局的影响。
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 29;12:1625404. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1625404. eCollection 2025.
2
Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence.针对患有或未患有压力性尿失禁的盆腔器官脱垂女性的手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013108.
3
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.盆腔器官脱垂手术的围手术期干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 22;7(7):CD013105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013105.pub2.
4
Comparison of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concomitant total hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术联合全子宫切除术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的手术效果比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2025 Sep;51(9):e70068. doi: 10.1111/jog.70068.
5
Treatment Outcomes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Seven Years After the Introduction of Sacrocolpopexy at a Single Institution.单一机构引入骶骨阴道固定术后七年的盆腔器官脱垂治疗结果
Cureus. 2025 Aug 8;17(8):e89647. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89647. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.机器人辅助经阴道骶骨固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:系统评价和比较研究的荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):303-18. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.053. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
7
Impact of Previous Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair on Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Mesh Sacrocolpopexy.
Urology. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.07.008.
8
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.女性盆腔器官脱垂的外科治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5.
9
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.盆腔器官脱垂手术的围手术期干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013105.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.传统腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;132(3):284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent hysterectomy or uterine preservation: A metanalysis and systematic review.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术联合子宫切除术或保留子宫:一项荟萃分析与系统评价。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;168(2):456-471. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15891. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.阴道顶端脱垂妇女的手术治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 26;7(7):CD012376. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012376.pub2.
3
Urinary incontinence and quality of life in high-performance swimmers: An observational study.
运动员的尿失禁与生活质量:一项观察性研究。
Health Care Women Int. 2024;45(12):1446-1455. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2023.2197861. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
4
Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Perimenopausal and Menopausal Women.围绝经期和绝经后女性的盆腔器官脱垂
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022 Jun;72(3):250-257. doi: 10.1007/s13224-021-01524-8. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
5
International urogynecology consultation chapter 1 committee 2: Epidemiology of pelvic organ prolapse: prevalence, incidence, natural history, and service needs.国际尿控协会妇科学咨询分会第1章委员会2:盆腔器官脱垂的流行病学:患病率、发病率、自然史及服务需求
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):173-187. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05018-z. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
6
Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助和腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):449. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4347.
7
Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.比较机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术和腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的疗效。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):297-308. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04741-x. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
8
Challenges of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients and How to Optimize Success.肥胖患者行机器人妇科手术的挑战及如何优化手术成功率。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Jul 1;23(7):51. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0788-7.
9
Cost-analysis and quality of life after laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for posterior compartment prolapse: a randomized trial.腹腔镜和机器人后盆腔脱垂补片固定术治疗后盆腔脱垂的成本分析和生活质量:一项随机试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 May;23(5):461-470. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01991-2. Epub 2019 May 8.
10
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy posthysterectomy: intraoperative feasibility and safety in obese women compared with women of normal weight.子宫切除术后腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术:肥胖女性与正常体重女性的术中可行性及安全性比较
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Dec;30(12):2041-2048. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03888-y. Epub 2019 Feb 27.