Suppr超能文献

草药产品信息的在线来源。

Online sources of herbal product information.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administrative Sciences at Idaho State University College of Pharmacy, Pocatello.

Department of Philosophy, Idaho State University, Pocatello.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2014 Feb;127(2):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

Abstract

Herbal products are commonly used to treat clinical conditions and are often purchased online without the supervision of a healthcare provider. The use of herbals remains controversial because of widespread exaggerated claims of clinical efficacy and safety. We conducted an online search of 13 common herbals (including black cohosh, echinacea, garlic, ginkgo, ginseng, green tea, kava, saw palmetto, and St John's wort) and reviewed the top 50 Web sites for each using a Google search. We analyzed clinical claims, warnings, and other safety information. A total of 1179 Web sites were examined. Less than 8% of retail sites provided information regarding potential adverse effects, drug interactions, and other safety information; only 10.5% recommended consultation with a healthcare professional. Less than 3% cited scientific literature to accompany their claims. Key safety information is still lacking from many online sources of herbal information. Certain nonretail site types may be more reliable, but physicians and other healthcare professionals should be aware of the variable quality of these sites to help patients make more informed decisions.

摘要

草药产品常用于治疗临床病症,且常未经医疗保健提供者监督而在线购买。由于对临床疗效和安全性的广泛夸大声称,草药的使用仍存在争议。我们对 13 种常见草药(包括黑升麻、紫锥菊、大蒜、银杏、人参、绿茶、卡瓦、锯棕榈和贯叶连翘)进行了在线搜索,并使用谷歌搜索对每种草药的前 50 个网站进行了回顾。我们分析了临床声称、警告和其他安全信息。共检查了 1179 个网站。不到 8%的零售网站提供有关潜在副作用、药物相互作用和其他安全信息的信息;只有 10.5%的网站建议咨询医疗保健专业人员。不到 3%的网站引用科学文献来支持其声称。许多草药信息的在线来源仍缺乏关键安全信息。某些非零售网站类型可能更可靠,但医生和其他医疗保健专业人员应该意识到这些网站的质量参差不齐,以帮助患者做出更明智的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验