Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Department of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1058-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
Few data exist regarding the impact on survival of definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa).
To evaluate the survival of men diagnosed with mPCa based on definitive treatment of the prostate.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Men with documented stage IV (M1a-c) PCa at diagnosis identified using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) (2004-2010) and divided based on definitive treatment of the prostate (radical prostatectomy [RP] or brachytherapy [BT]) or no surgery or radiation therapy (NSR).
Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate overall survival (OS). Multivariable competing risks regression analysis was used to calculate disease-specific survival (DSS) probability and identify factors associated with cause-specific mortality (CSM).
A total of 8185 patients were identified: NSR (n=7811), RP (n=245), and BT (n=129). The 5-yr OS and predicted DSS were each significantly higher in patients undergoing RP (67.4% and 75.8%, respectively) or BT (52.6 and 61.3%, respectively) compared with NSR patients (22.5% and 48.7%, respectively) (p<0.001). Undergoing RP or BT was each independently associated with decreased CSM (p<0.01). Similar results were noted regardless of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) M stage. Factors associated with increased CSM in patients undergoing local therapy included AJCC T4 stage, high-grade disease, prostate-specific antigen ≥20 ng/ml, age ≥70 yr, and pelvic lymphadenopathy (p<0.05). The major limitation of this study was the lack of variables from SEER known to influence survival of patients with mPCa, including treatment with systemic therapy.
Definitive treatment of the prostate in men diagnosed with mPCa suggests a survival benefit in this large population-based study. These results should serve as a foundation for future prospective trials.
We used a large population-based cancer database to examine survival in men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) undergoing definitive therapy for the prostate. Local therapy (LT) appeared to confer a survival benefit. Therefore, we conclude that prospective trials are needed to further evaluate the role of LT in mPCa.
关于确诊转移性前列腺癌(mPCa)患者接受前列腺根治性治疗对生存的影响,相关数据有限。
评估确诊为 mPCa 患者接受前列腺根治性治疗的生存情况。
设计、地点和参与者:使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2004-2010 年),根据前列腺根治性治疗(根治性前列腺切除术[RP]或近距离放射治疗[BT])或未行手术或放射治疗(NSR),对确诊为 mPCa 且有记录的 IV 期(M1a-c)PCa 男性进行分组。
采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算总生存率(OS)。采用多变量竞争风险回归分析计算疾病特异性生存率(DSS)概率,并确定与特定原因死亡率(CSM)相关的因素。
共纳入 8185 例患者:NSR(n=7811)、RP(n=245)和 BT(n=129)。与 NSR 患者(22.5%和 48.7%)相比,接受 RP 或 BT 治疗的患者 5 年 OS 和预测 DSS 均显著更高(分别为 67.4%和 75.8%)(p<0.001)。接受 RP 或 BT 治疗与 CSM 降低独立相关(p<0.01)。无论采用美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)M 分期如何,均观察到类似的结果。接受局部治疗的患者中,与 CSM 增加相关的因素包括 AJCC T4 期、高级别疾病、前列腺特异性抗原≥20ng/ml、年龄≥70 岁和盆腔淋巴结病(p<0.05)。本研究的主要局限性在于缺乏 SEER 中已知影响 mPCa 患者生存的变量,包括系统治疗。
在确诊为 mPCa 的男性中,对前列腺进行根治性治疗提示在这项大型基于人群的研究中具有生存获益。这些结果应作为未来前瞻性试验的基础。
我们使用大型基于人群的癌症数据库,研究了接受前列腺根治性治疗的 mPCa 患者的生存情况。局部治疗(LT)似乎带来了生存获益。因此,我们认为需要进行前瞻性试验,以进一步评估 LT 在 mPCa 中的作用。