Díaz-Alersi R, Navarro-Ramírez C
Servicio de Cuidados Críticos y Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Puerto Real, Puerto Real, Cádiz, España.
Servicio de Cuidados Críticos y Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Puerto Real, Puerto Real, Cádiz, España.
Med Intensiva. 2014 Jun-Jul;38(5):311-4. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome may require high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels, though the optimum level remains to be established. Several clinical trials have compared high PEEP levels versus conventional PEEP. Overall, although high PEEP levels improve oxygenation and are safe, they do not result in a significant reduction of the mortality rates. Nevertheless, some metaanalyses have revealed 2 situations in which high PEEP may decrease mortality: When used in severe distress and when PEEP is set following the characteristics of lung mechanics. Five studies have explored this latter scenario. Unfortunately, all of them have small sample sizes and have used different means to determine optimum PEEP. It is therefore necessary to conduct studies of sufficient sample size to compare the treatment of patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, using a protective ventilation strategy with high PEEP guided by the characteristics of lung mechanics and ventilation with the protocol proposed by the ARDS Network.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者可能需要较高的呼气末正压(PEEP)水平,不过最佳水平仍有待确定。多项临床试验比较了高PEEP水平与传统PEEP。总体而言,虽然高PEEP水平可改善氧合且安全,但并未显著降低死亡率。然而,一些荟萃分析揭示了高PEEP可能降低死亡率的两种情况:用于严重窘迫时以及根据肺力学特征设置PEEP时。有五项研究探讨了后一种情况。遗憾的是,它们的样本量都很小,且采用了不同方法来确定最佳PEEP。因此,有必要开展足够样本量的研究,以比较采用肺力学特征指导的高PEEP保护性通气策略治疗严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者与采用急性呼吸窘迫综合征网络所提议方案进行通气的效果。