牛津膝关节与髋关节评分的邮寄方式与电话方式管理
Mail versus telephone administration of the Oxford Knee and Hip Scores.
作者信息
Abdel Messih Marena, Naylor J M, Descallar J, Manickam A, Mittal R, Harris I A
机构信息
University of New South Wales, Kensington, Sydney, Australia.
South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia; Liverpool Hospital Orthopaedic Department, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia; Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell St, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
出版信息
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar;29(3):491-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.047. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
Telephone and postal methods of administration of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were compared on 85 and 61 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA), respectively. The test for equivalence was significant for both the knee (P<0.001) and hip participants (P<0.001) indicating that the modes of administration yielded similar results. The ICCs of the OKS and OHS were 0.79 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.70, 0.86) and 0.87 (0.79, 0.92) respectively. The 95% limits of agreement were wide for both scores (OKS LOA, -8.6, 8.2; OHS LOA, -7.7, 5.3). The two modes of administration of the OKS and OHS produce equivalent survey responses at a group level but the same method of administration should be constant for individual monitoring in a clinical setting.
分别对85例接受全膝关节置换术（TKA）的患者和61例接受全髋关节置换术（THA）的患者，比较了牛津膝关节评分（OKS）和牛津髋关节评分（OHS）的电话和邮寄管理方式。等效性检验对膝关节组（P<0.001）和髋关节组参与者（P<0.001）均具有显著性，表明两种管理方式产生了相似的结果。OKS和OHS的组内相关系数（ICC）分别为0.79（95%置信区间（CI）0.70, 0.86）和0.87（0.79, 0.92）。两个评分的95%一致性界限都较宽（OKS一致性界限，-8.6, 8.2；OHS一致性界限，-7.7, 5.3）。OKS和OHS的两种管理方式在组水平上产生等效的调查反应，但在临床环境中进行个体监测时，应采用相同的管理方法并保持一致。
Zotero 插件