Yan Guang, Arelly Naresh, Farhan Nashid, Lobo Shabbir, Li Henan
Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, United States.
Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, United States.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014 Feb 14;52:215-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a motorized microneedle device in delivery of DNA into skin for gene expression. A plasmid DNA encoding both luciferase (Luc) and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) was delivered into rat skin by puncturing the skin with the microneedle device. Puncturing rat skin with a pre-applied DNA solution on the skin showed much higher luciferase gene expression than that with the procedure of puncturing the skin first then applied the DNA solution. The microneedle puncturing method was more efficient than intradermal injection method in generating high gene expression in the skin. There was no significant difference in the skin gene expression when rat skin was punctured with the microneedle device of different microneedle lengths (0.25 mm, 0.5mm or 0.75 mm). On the other hand, there was a significant difference in the skin gene expression between the short (10s) and the long puncturing durations (30 or 60s), with longer puncturing duration showed higher gene expression. Puncturing the skin with longer needles (0.75 mm) caused some skin damage, while puncturing the skin with shorter microneedle length (0.25 mm) caused only minimal skin damage. The EGFP gene expression was observed predominately in the epidermis layer of the skin from the puncturing method in delivery of DNA into the skin. In summary, the motorized microneedle device could have great potential in skin gene delivery.
本研究的目的是评估一种电动微针装置在将DNA导入皮肤以实现基因表达方面的效果。通过用微针装置穿刺皮肤,将编码荧光素酶(Luc)和增强型绿色荧光蛋白(EGFP)的质粒DNA导入大鼠皮肤。在皮肤上预先涂抹DNA溶液后穿刺大鼠皮肤,其荧光素酶基因表达比先穿刺皮肤然后再涂抹DNA溶液的方法高得多。在皮肤中产生高基因表达方面,微针穿刺方法比皮内注射方法更有效。用不同微针长度(0.25mm、0.5mm或0.75mm)的微针装置穿刺大鼠皮肤时,皮肤基因表达没有显著差异。另一方面,短时间(10秒)和长时间(30或60秒)穿刺在皮肤基因表达上存在显著差异,穿刺时间越长基因表达越高。用较长的针(0.75mm)穿刺皮肤会造成一些皮肤损伤,而用较短微针长度(0.25mm)穿刺皮肤只会造成最小程度的皮肤损伤。从将DNA导入皮肤的穿刺方法中观察到,EGFP基因表达主要出现在皮肤的表皮层。总之,电动微针装置在皮肤基因递送方面可能具有巨大潜力。