联合注册机构：数据解读的托勒密模型？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Joint Registries: a Ptolemaic model of data interpretation?

作者信息

Konan S, Haddad F S

机构信息

University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2013 Dec;95-B(12):1585-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B12.33353.

DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.95B12.33353

PMID:24293585

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Joint Registries: a Ptolemaic model of data interpretation?

Bone Joint J. 2013 Dec;95-B(12):1585-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B12.33353.

Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data. I. Introduction and background.

Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun;82(3):253-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.588862.

The International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries: overview and summary.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93 Suppl 3:1-12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01125.

National joint replacement registry.

Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009 Oct;38(10):497-8.

Meta-analyses in joint arthroplasty: a review of quantity, quality, and impact.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2304-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01289.

Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Acta Orthop. 2006 Feb;77(1):49-56. doi: 10.1080/17453670610045696.

Statistical analysis of arthroplasty register data.

Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):10-4. doi: 10.3109/17453671003587168.

[Experiences with the German Endoprosthesis Register].

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2001 Apr;95(3):203-8.

Joint registries: what can we learn in 2016?

Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1 Supple A):3-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0353.R1.

Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data. II. Guidelines.

Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun;82(3):258-67. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.588863.

引用本文的文献

How do cemented short Exeter stems perform compared with standard-length Exeter stems? The experience of the New Zealand National Joint Registry.

Arthroplast Today. 2020 Mar 3;6(1):104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.01.003. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Outcomes and early revision rate after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: prospective results from a non-designer single surgeon.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 May 29;19(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2099-2.

Advantages and limitations of national arthroplasty registries. The need for multicenter registries: the Rempro-SBQ.

Rev Bras Ortop. 2017 Aug 30;52(Suppl 1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.08.008. eCollection 2017.

Trends in hip replacements between 1999 and 2012 in Sweden.

J Orthop Res. 2018 Jan;36(1):432-442. doi: 10.1002/jor.23711. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.

Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):592-600. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-1232.R1.

Are all metal-on-metal hip revision operations contributing to the National Joint Registry implant survival curves? : a study comparing the London Implant Retrieval Centre and National Joint Registry datasets.

Bone Joint J. 2016 Jan;98-B(1):33-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36431.

A Community-Based Hip Fracture Registry: Population, Methods, and Outcomes.

Perm J. 2015 Summer;19(3):29-36. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-231. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验