• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

36毫米金属对金属Pinnacle全髋关节置换系统失败的危险因素:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。

Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.

作者信息

Matharu G S, Nandra R S, Berryman F, Judge A, Pynsent P B, Dunlop D J

机构信息

University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.

The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):592-600. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-1232.R1.

DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-1232.R1
PMID:28455467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5413867/
Abstract

AIMS

To determine ten-year failure rates following 36 mm metal-on-metal (MoM) Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty (THA), and identify predictors of failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assessed a single-centre cohort of 569 primary 36 mm MoM Pinnacle THAs (all Corail stems) followed up since 2012 according to Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency recommendations. All-cause failure rates (all-cause revision, and non-revised cross-sectional imaging failures) were calculated, with predictors for failure identified using multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

Failure occurred in 97 hips (17.0%). The ten-year cumulative failure rate was 27.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.6 to 33.7). Primary implantation from 2006 onwards (hazard ratio (HR) 4.30; 95% CI 1.82 to 10.1; p = 0.001) and bilateral MoM hip arthroplasty (HR 1.59; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.46; p = 0.037) predicted failure. The effect of implantation year on failure varied over time. From four years onwards following surgery, hips implanted since 2006 had significantly higher failure rates (eight years 28.3%; 95% CI 23.1 to 34.5) compared with hips implanted before 2006 (eight years 6.3%; 95% CI 2.4 to 15.8) (HR 15.2; 95% CI 2.11 to 110.4; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

We observed that 36 mm MoM Pinnacle THAs have an unacceptably high ten-year failure rate, especially if implanted from 2006 onwards or in bilateral MoM hip patients. Our findings regarding implantation year and failure support recent concerns about the device manufacturing process. We recommend all patients undergoing implantation since 2006 and those with bilateral MoM hips undergo regular investigation, regardless of symptoms. Cite this article: 2017;99-B:592-600.

摘要

目的

确定36毫米金属对金属(MoM)Pinnacle全髋关节置换术(THA)术后十年的失败率,并找出失败的预测因素。

患者与方法

我们根据药品和医疗产品监管局的建议,对自2012年起随访的569例初次36毫米MoM Pinnacle THA(均为Corail股骨柄)的单中心队列进行了回顾性评估。计算全因失败率(全因翻修和未翻修的横断面影像失败),并使用多变量Cox回归确定失败的预测因素。

结果

97例髋关节出现失败(17.0%)。十年累积失败率为27.1%(95%置信区间(CI)21.6至33.7)。2006年起初次植入(风险比(HR)4.30;95%CI 1.82至10.1;p = 0.001)和双侧MoM髋关节置换术(HR 1.59;95%CI 1.03至2.46;p = 0.037)可预测失败。植入年份对失败的影响随时间变化。术后四年起,2006年起植入的髋关节失败率显著高于2006年前植入的髋关节(八年时分别为28.3%;95%CI 23.1至34.5和6.3%;95%CI 2.4至15.8)(HR 15.2;95%CI 2.11至110.4;p = 0.007)。

结论

我们观察到,36毫米MoM Pinnacle THA的十年失败率高得令人无法接受,特别是2006年起植入的或双侧MoM髋关节患者。我们关于植入年份与失败的研究结果支持了近期对该器械制造工艺的担忧。我们建议2006年起接受植入的所有患者以及双侧MoM髋关节患者定期接受检查,无论有无症状。引用本文:2017;99 - B:第本文:2017;99 - B:592 - 600页。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203b/5413867/3933cc80a98f/BJJ-2016-1232.R1-galleyfig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203b/5413867/91f48eea6c05/BJJ-2016-1232.R1-galleyfig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203b/5413867/108d6c4aaf94/BJJ-2016-1232.R1-galleyfig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203b/5413867/3933cc80a98f/BJJ-2016-1232.R1-galleyfig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203b/5413867/91f48eea6c05/BJJ-2016-1232.R1-galleyfig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203b/5413867/108d6c4aaf94/BJJ-2016-1232.R1-galleyfig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/203b/5413867/3933cc80a98f/BJJ-2016-1232.R1-galleyfig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for failure of the 36 mm metal-on-metal Pinnacle total hip arthroplasty system: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.36毫米金属对金属Pinnacle全髋关节置换系统失败的危险因素:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2017 May;99-B(5):592-600. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-1232.R1.
2
Is the rate of revision of 36 mm metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with Pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? an interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.使用来自英格兰和威尔士国家关节注册处的数据进行中断时间序列分析:采用Pinnacle髋臼组件的36毫米金属对金属全髋关节置换术的翻修率与初次手术年份有关吗?
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1):33-41. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0625.R2.
3
High Revision Rate for Large-head Metal-on-metal THA at a Mean of 7.1 Years: A Registry Study.7.1 年平均随访时大直径金属对金属全髋关节置换的高翻修率:一项注册研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jun;476(6):1223-1230. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000159.
4
Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.8 年随访后,初次全髋关节置换术的患者中,金属对金属 Ultamet 比陶瓷对陶瓷的存活率相同,但骨溶解率更高。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1155-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
Adverse reactions to metal debris occur with all types of hip replacement not just metal-on-metal hips: a retrospective observational study of 3340 revisions for adverse reactions to metal debris from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.金属碎片的不良反应发生在所有类型的髋关节置换手术中,而不仅仅是金属对金属的髋关节:这是一项对来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节注册中心的3340例因金属碎片不良反应进行翻修手术的回顾性观察研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Dec 13;17(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1329-8.
6
Predictive Factors for Revision and Survivorship Analysis of a Prevalent 36-mm Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacement System: A Large Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.一种常见的36毫米金属对金属全髋关节置换系统翻修的预测因素及生存分析:一项大型单中心回顾性队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Apr;36(4):1380-1387. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.028. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
7
Declining Revision Burden of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties.金属对金属髋关节置换术翻修负担的下降
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Sep;34(9):2058-2064.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.058. Epub 2019 May 2.
8
Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.金属对金属的不良反应并非全髋关节置换术中大头假体所独有。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):432-40. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4539-8.
9
Retrospective cohort study of the performance of the Pinnacle metal on metal (MoM) total hip replacement: a single-centre investigation in combination with the findings of a national retrieval centre.回顾性队列研究:Pinnacle 金属对金属(MoM)全髋关节置换的表现:单中心调查结果与全国检索中心的发现相结合。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 29;6(4):e007847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007847.
10
Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?髋关节置换术中人工关节周围感染:感染与关节面类型之间存在关联吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2213-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4916-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Case report: Formation and recurrence of inflammatory pseudotumor after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.病例报告:金属对金属髋关节置换术后炎性假瘤的形成与复发
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 11;11:1422230. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1422230. eCollection 2024.
2
Perioperative Complications after Hip and Knee Revision Arthroplasty in the over 80 Years Old Population: A Retrospective Observational Case-Control Study.80岁以上人群髋膝关节翻修置换术后的围手术期并发症:一项回顾性观察性病例对照研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 11;12(6):2186. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062186.
3
How much does a Medical and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency medical device alert for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients really cost?

本文引用的文献

1
Can blood metal ion levels be used to identify patients with bilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacings who are at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris?血液金属离子水平能否用于识别接受双侧伯明翰髋关节表面置换术且有金属碎屑不良反应风险的患者?
Bone Joint J. 2016 Nov;98-B(11):1455-1462. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.38042.
2
Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Hip Resurfacing Revision: A Cohort Study Into the Second Decade After the Operation.髋关节表面置换翻修的患病率及危险因素:一项关于手术后第二个十年的队列研究
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):1444-52. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01234.
3
The clinical implications of metal debris release from the taper junctions and bearing surfaces of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: joint fluid and blood metal ion concentrations.
金属对金属髋关节置换术患者的医疗器械警戒对医疗和保健产品监管机构来说究竟要花费多少?
Hip Int. 2022 Jul;32(4):493-500. doi: 10.1177/1120700020983297. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
4
The current role of robotics in total hip arthroplasty.机器人技术在全髋关节置换术中的当前作用。
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Nov 1;4(11):618-625. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180088. eCollection 2019 Nov.
5
Has the threshold for revision surgery for adverse reactions to metal debris changed in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients? A cohort study of 239 patients using an adapted risk-stratification algorithm.金属对金属髋关节置换术后金属颗粒不良反应行翻修手术的阈值是否发生了变化?采用改良风险分层算法对 239 例患者进行的队列研究
Acta Orthop. 2019 Dec;90(6):530-536. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1659661. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions.金属对金属髋关节置换术后金属屑不良反应患者中不存在推荐翻修手术的阈值:346 例翻修的回顾性队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1483-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.022. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
7
Wear performance of retrieved metal-on-metal Pinnacle hip arthroplasties implanted before and after 2007.2007年前后植入的取出的金属对金属Pinnacle髋关节置换术的磨损性能
Bone Joint Res. 2018 Dec 1;7(11):595-600. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.711.BJR-2018-0143.R1. eCollection 2018 Nov.
8
The risk of cardiac failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.金属对金属髋关节置换术后心力衰竭的风险。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1):20-27. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-1065.R1.
9
What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?金属对金属髋关节置换术患者的适当监测方法是什么?
Acta Orthop. 2018 Feb;89(1):29-39. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1398011. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
金属对金属髋关节置换术的锥度连接和轴承表面金属碎屑释放的临床意义:关节液和血液中的金属离子浓度
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jul;98-B(7):925-33. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B7.37029.
4
Retrospective cohort study of the performance of the Pinnacle metal on metal (MoM) total hip replacement: a single-centre investigation in combination with the findings of a national retrieval centre.回顾性队列研究:Pinnacle 金属对金属(MoM)全髋关节置换的表现:单中心调查结果与全国检索中心的发现相结合。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 29;6(4):e007847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007847.
5
The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris.血金属离子在识别单侧 Birmingham 髋关节表面置换和 Corail-Pinnacle 金属对金属髋关节植入物患者对金属屑不良反应风险中的有效性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Apr 20;98(8):617-26. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00340.
6
Which imaging modality is most effective for identifying pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip resurfacings requiring revision: ultrasound or MARS-MRI or both?对于需要翻修的金属对金属髋关节表面置换术中识别假肿瘤,哪种成像方式最有效:超声、MARS-MRI还是两者皆有效?
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jan;98-B(1):40-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36746.
7
How Should We Follow-Up Asymptomatic Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Patients? A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.我们应如何对无症状金属对金属髋关节表面置换患者进行随访?一项前瞻性纵向队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan;31(1):146-51. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
8
The Symmetry of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions in Patients with Bilateral Simultaneous and Sequential ASR Hip Replacement.双侧同时和序贯进行ASR髋关节置换患者局部组织不良反应的对称性
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Oct;30(10):1794-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 May 30.
9
Follow-Up of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients Is Currently Not Evidence Based or Cost Effective.目前,金属对金属髋关节置换术患者的随访既无循证依据,也不具有成本效益。
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Aug;30(8):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
10
Revision of Metal-on-metal Hip Prostheses Results in Marked Reduction of Blood Cobalt and Chromium Ion Concentrations.金属对金属髋关节假体翻修导致血液中钴和铬离子浓度显著降低。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jul;473(7):2305-13. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4156-6. Epub 2015 Jan 27.