College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University , Fort Lauderdale, FL , USA.
Front Oncol. 2013 Nov 14;3:276. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00276. eCollection 2013.
A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to investigate whether adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapeutics offered any additional benefit than surgery alone in the treatment of Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC).
A PubMed, MEDLINE search was conducted between 1995 and 2013, to identify reported cases of surgically treated MCC followed by either observation, radiation, or chemoradiation. Patient demographics and outcomes were recorded and compared in a systematic fashion.
Thirty-four studies (n = 4475) were included. The median age was 73 years, median follow up was 36 months and there was a 1.5:1 ratio of men to women. All 4475 patients had surgery, 1975 had no further treatment, 1689 received postoperative RT, and 301 received postoperative chemoRT. The most common site was face/head/neck, 47.8%. Stage 1 was the most common clinical stage at diagnosis (57%). Three-year local control was 20% (median 10%) in the observation cohort, compared to 65% (62%) with postoperative RT, and 67% (75%) with postoperative chemoRT; these findings were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Recurrence was found to be 38% (60%) in the observation cohort, compared to 23% (20%) with postoperative RT (P < 0.001). Three-year overall survival (OS) was found to be 56% (57%) in the observation cohort, compared to 70% (78%) with postoperative RT and 73% (76%) with postoperative chemoRT (P < 0.001). The observation cohort had a median OS of 44 months compared with 64 months (P < 0.001) in the postoperative RT cohort. There was no statistically significant difference in any parameters assessed between postoperative radiation and postoperative chemoradiation arms.
The comprehensive collection of retrospective data suggests a survival and control benefit for postoperative radiation in MCC. No differences were noted between adjuvant radiation and chemoradiation. This analysis indicates the need for prospective trials with patients stratified by known prognostic factors.
系统回顾文献,以探讨辅助放疗和/或化疗是否比单纯手术能为 Merkel 细胞癌(MCC)患者带来更多获益。
通过 PubMed 和 MEDLINE 数据库检索 1995 年至 2013 年间的文献,以确定报道的手术治疗后接受观察、放疗或放化疗的 MCC 病例。系统地记录并比较患者的人口统计学数据和结局。
共纳入 34 项研究(n=4475 例)。患者中位年龄为 73 岁,中位随访时间为 36 个月,男女比例为 1.5:1。4475 例患者均接受手术治疗,其中 1975 例未接受进一步治疗,1689 例接受术后放疗,301 例接受术后放化疗。最常见的部位是面部/头部/颈部,占 47.8%。诊断时最常见的临床分期是Ⅰ期(57%)。观察队列的 3 年局部控制率为 20%(中位值为 10%),而术后放疗组为 65%(62%),术后放化疗组为 67%(75%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。观察队列的复发率为 38%(60%),而术后放疗组为 23%(20%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。观察队列的 3 年总生存率(OS)为 56%(57%),而术后放疗组为 70%(78%),术后放化疗组为 73%(76%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。观察队列的中位 OS 为 44 个月,而术后放疗组为 64 个月(P<0.001)。术后放疗组和术后放化疗组之间在评估的所有参数上均无统计学差异。
对回顾性数据的综合分析表明,MCC 患者术后放疗可提高生存率和控制率。辅助放疗与放化疗之间无差异。本分析表明需要对已知预后因素分层的患者进行前瞻性试验。