Roopa Srinivasan, Geetha M Bagavad, Rani Anitha, Chacko Thomas
Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute, Sri Ramachandra University , Porur, Chennai - 600116, Tamil Nadu, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Oct;7(10):2244-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5985.3482. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
An one hour didactic lecture is the common method of teaching in dental colleges in India. Lengthy lectures are boring and students are passive recipients of the information. Interactive lectures are suggested as a means of overcoming the disadvantages of regular lectures.
The present study was conducted to pilot various methods of making lectures interactive and to find the students' reactions to interactive lectures as compared to regular lectures.
An entire batch of first year dental students (n = 78) was exposed to both interactive and regular lectures for the cardiovascular system in physiology. Among the total number of 12 lectures, alternate lectures were conducted in an interactive style. At the end of the 12 lecture series, students' opinions were obtained using a structured feedback evaluation questionnaire, consisting of five statements, on a five point Likert scale. Statistical Analysis was done using SPSS software, version 15.
Interactive lectures were found to be more useful than regular lectures by 92% of the students. Significantly more number of students agreed or strongly agreed that interactive lectures kept them attentive, created interest, overcame monotony, motivated them for self learning and provided well defined learning than regular lectures. Among the different techniques which were used, the students preferred use of video clippings (58.1%), followed by each-one-teach-one. RESULTS of the present study support the use of interactive lectures for ensuring increased interest and attention of students during lectures.
Interactive lectures were more accepted and considered to be more useful than regular lectures by the students.
在印度,一小时的理论讲座是牙科学院常见的教学方法。冗长的讲座很枯燥,学生只是信息的被动接受者。有人建议采用互动式讲座来克服常规讲座的弊端。
开展本研究以试点多种使讲座变得互动的方法,并了解与常规讲座相比,学生对互动式讲座的反应。
将整批一年级牙科学生(n = 78)分为两组,分别让他们参加生理学中关于心血管系统的互动式讲座和常规讲座。在总共12次讲座中,交替采用互动式和常规式进行授课。在12次讲座系列结束时,使用一份结构化反馈评估问卷获取学生的意见,问卷由五个陈述组成,采用五点李克特量表。使用SPSS软件15版进行统计分析。
92%的学生认为互动式讲座比常规讲座更有用。与常规讲座相比,明显更多的学生同意或强烈同意互动式讲座能让他们保持专注、激发兴趣、克服单调、促使他们自主学习并提供明确的学习内容。在使用的不同技巧中,学生更喜欢使用视频片段(58.1%),其次是“一人教一人”的方式。本研究结果支持使用互动式讲座以确保在讲座期间提高学生的兴趣和注意力。
学生更接受互动式讲座,认为其比常规讲座更有用。