Nicholl Jillian, Waters Wendy, Mulley John C, Suwalski Shanna, Brown Sue, Hull Yvonne, Barnett Christopher, Haan Eric, Thompson Elizabeth M, Liebelt Jan, Mcgregor Lesley, Harbord Michael G, Entwistle John, Munt Chris, White Dierdre, Chitti Anthony, Baulderstone David, Ketteridge David, Friend Kathryn, Bain Sharon M, Yu Sui
1Cytogenetics, Department of Genetic Medicine, Directorate of Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology at Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide 2Molecular Genetics, Department of Genetic Medicine, Directorate of Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology at Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide 3School of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Adelaide 4School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, The University of Adelaide 5South Australian Clinical Genetics Service, SA Pathology at Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide 6Centre for Disability Health, North East Clinic, Modbury Hospital, Adelaide 7Ashford Medical Centre, Ashford, Adelaide 8Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park 9Calvary Hospital, North Adelaide 10Women's and Children's Health Network, North Adelaide 11Parks Community Health Service, Angle Park, South Australia, Australia 12see Acknowledgements for all members.
Pathology. 2014 Jan;46(1):41-5. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000043.
The aim of this study was to determine prospectively the frequency of pathogenic chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications in a large group of referred patients with developmental delay (DD), intellectual disability (ID) or autism spectrum disorders (ASD) within a genetic diagnostic service. First tier testing was applied using a standardised oligo-array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) platform, replacing conventional cytogenetic testing that would have been used in the past. Copy number variants (CNVs) found to be responsible for the clinical condition on the request form could all be subdivided into three groups: well established pathogenic microdeletion/microduplication/aneuploidy syndromes, predicted pathogenic CNVs as interpreted by the laboratory, and recently established pathogenic disease susceptibility CNVs. Totalled from these three groups, with CNVs of uncertain significance excluded, detection rates were: DD (13.0%), ID (15.6%), ASD (2.3%), ASD with DD (8.2%), ASD with ID (12.7%) and unexplained epilepsy with DD, ID and ASD (10.9%). The greater diagnostic sensitivity arising from routine application of array CGH, compared with previously used conventional cytogenetics, outweighs the interpretative issues for the reporting laboratory and referring clinician arising from detection of CNVs of uncertain significance. Precise determination of any previously hidden molecular defect responsible for the patient's condition is translated to improved genetic counselling.
本研究的目的是前瞻性地确定在基因诊断服务中,一大群转诊的发育迟缓(DD)、智力残疾(ID)或自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者中致病性染色体微缺失和微重复的频率。使用标准化的寡核苷酸阵列比较基因组杂交(CGH)平台进行一级检测,取代过去使用的传统细胞遗传学检测。在申请表上发现的与临床状况相关的拷贝数变异(CNV)均可分为三组:已明确的致病性微缺失/微重复/非整倍体综合征、实验室解读为预测致病性的CNV,以及最近确定的致病性疾病易感性CNV。排除意义不明确的CNV后,这三组的总检出率分别为:DD(13.0%)、ID(15.6%)、ASD(2.3%)、伴有DD的ASD(8.2%)、伴有ID的ASD(12.7%)以及伴有DD、ID和ASD的不明原因癫痫(10.9%)。与先前使用的传统细胞遗传学方法相比,阵列CGH的常规应用具有更高的诊断敏感性,这超过了报告实验室和转诊临床医生因检测到意义不明确的CNV而产生的解释问题。精确确定导致患者病情的任何先前隐藏的分子缺陷有助于改善遗传咨询。