• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[直肠癌根治切除标本充分病理评估的相关性]

[Relevance of an adequate pathologic evaluation of radical rectal resection specimens].

作者信息

Lino-Silva Leonardo Saúl, Molina-Frías Ernesto, Salcedo-Hernández Rosa Angélica, Herrera-Gómez Angel, Padilla-Rosciano Alejandro

机构信息

Departamento de Patología Oncológica Gastrointestinal, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, México DF, México.

出版信息

Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2013 Sep;43(3):198-205.

PMID:24303685
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The most important prognostic factors influencing survival of patients with rectal carcinoma (RC) are lymph node metastases and mesorectal excision (ME). The adequate pathologic examination (APE) of rectal specimens is a standardized pathologic work-up that differs of the conventional colonic/intestinal pathologic work-up. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of APE on staging, lymph node retrieval and survival, with the hypotheses that APE allows high lymph node retrieval and better survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patient with surgery for RC from 2004 to 2011. We described the APE of radical rectal resection and we compared the clinical and pathological characteristics and the oncologic results, including survival after and before APE.

RESULTS

A total of 185 patients were evaluated, 114 constituted the pre-APE group and 71 the APE group. The mean lymph node retrieval was 13.7 in the pre-APE group and 19.6 in the APE group (P = 0.007). In the APE group we found less local recurrence (20% vs 34%, P = 0.024), more lymph-vascular invasion (20% vs 5%, P = 0.003), higher prevalence of high grade tumors (20% vs 4%, P = 0.001), more alive patients free of disease (75% vs 49%, P = 0.001), more frequent use of neoadjuvant therapy (58% vs 31%, P = 0.001), and and better 4-year survival (78% vs 53%, P = 0.044). CONCLU- SION: The APE is crucial in patients with RC for staging and planning further treatment. An APE added to neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy was associated with better survival.

摘要

背景

影响直肠癌(RC)患者生存的最重要预后因素是淋巴结转移和直肠系膜切除(ME)。直肠标本的充分病理检查(APE)是一种标准化的病理检查方法,与传统的结肠/肠道病理检查不同。本研究的目的是确定APE对分期、淋巴结获取和生存的影响,并假设APE能实现高淋巴结获取率和更好的生存。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2004年至2011年接受RC手术的患者。我们描述了根治性直肠切除的APE,并比较了临床和病理特征以及肿瘤学结果,包括APE前后的生存情况。

结果

共评估了185例患者,其中114例组成APE前组,71例组成APE组。APE前组的平均淋巴结获取数为13.7个,APE组为19.6个(P = 0.007)。在APE组中,我们发现局部复发较少(20%对34%,P = 0.024),淋巴血管侵犯较多(20%对5%,P = 0.003),高级别肿瘤的患病率较高(20%对4%,P = 0.001),无病存活患者较多(75%对49%,P = 0.001),新辅助治疗的使用更频繁(58%对31%,P = 0.001),4年生存率更高(78%对53%,P = 0.044)。结论:APE对RC患者的分期和进一步治疗规划至关重要。在新辅助或辅助治疗中增加APE与更好的生存相关。

相似文献

1
[Relevance of an adequate pathologic evaluation of radical rectal resection specimens].[直肠癌根治切除标本充分病理评估的相关性]
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2013 Sep;43(3):198-205.
2
Is final TNM staging a predictor for survival in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation therapy?最终TNM分期是否是局部晚期直肠癌术前放化疗后生存情况的预测指标?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct;14(10):2766-72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9471-z. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
3
Oncologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative resection with tumor-specific mesorectal excision for fixed locally advanced rectal cancer: Impact of postirradiated pathologic downstaging on local recurrence and survival.新辅助放化疗后行肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术根治性切除固定性局部晚期直肠癌的肿瘤学结局:放疗后病理降期对局部复发和生存的影响。
Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):1024-30. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225360.99257.73.
4
[Impact of meticulousness of pathologists on lymph node harvest after radical resection of invasive rectal carcinoma].[病理学家的细致程度对浸润性直肠癌根治性切除术后淋巴结清扫的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Nov;12(6):569-72.
5
The effect of circumferential tumor location in clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision.环周肿瘤位置对接受全直肠系膜切除术的直肠癌患者临床结局的影响。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Dec;48(12):2249-57. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0186-6.
6
Determining the need for radical surgery in patients with T1 rectal cancer.确定T1期直肠癌患者进行根治性手术的必要性。
Arch Surg. 2011 May;146(5):540-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.76.
7
[Lymph node metastasis and prognosis in T1 and T2 rectal carcinoma].[T1和T2期直肠癌的淋巴结转移与预后]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2006 Mar;28(3):235-7.
8
lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in patients with stage III rectal cancer treated with total mesorectal excision followed by chemoradiotherapy.在接受全直肠系膜切除术后进行放化疗的Ⅲ期直肠癌患者中,淋巴结比率作为一种预后因素。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 1;74(3):796-802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.065. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
9
Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer results in higher lymph node yield and better short-term outcomes than open surgery: a large single-center comparative study.腹腔镜直肠癌切除术比开放手术获得更高的淋巴结检出数和更好的短期疗效:一项大型单中心对比研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jun;56(6):679-88. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318287c594.
10
[Clinic study of lateral lymph node metastasis in advanced lower rectal cancer].[进展期低位直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移的临床研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Feb 1;46(3):190-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of young patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.年轻直肠腺癌患者的预后
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Feb;8(1):96-101. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.09.04.