Infection Control Unit, Brugmann University Hospital, 4 Place Van Gehuchten, 1020 Brussels, Belgium.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2013 Dec 5;2(1):33. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-2-33.
We analyzed the impact associated with an intervention based on process control and performance feedback to decrease central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates.This study was conducted from March 2011 to September 2012 in five adult intensive care units (ICU) located in two Belgian tertiary hospitals A and B, with a total of 53 beds.
This study was divided in three phases: P1 (baseline), P2 (intervention) and P3 (post intervention).During P2, external monitoring of five central venous catheters (CVC) care critical processes and monthly reporting (meetings and feedbacks reports posted) of performance indicators (CLABSI rate, CVC utilization ratio, compliance rate with each care process, and insertion site) to ICU workers were performed. The external monitoring of process measures was assessed by the same trained research nurse.A Poisson regression analysis was used to compare CLABSI incidence density rate per phase. Statistical significance was achieved with 2-sided p-value of <0.05. For the analysis, we separated the five ICU in hospital A and B when appropriate.
Significantly improved total mean compliance was achieved for hand hygiene, CVC handling and CVC dressing. CLABSI rate declined from 4.00 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.94-6.06) to 1.81 (0.46-3.17) per 1,000 CVC-days in P2 with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.49 (0.24-0.98, p = 0.043). A better response was observed in hospital A where the nurse participation at the monthly meeting was significantly higher than in hospital B (p < 0.001) as the percentage of feedbacks reports posted in ICU (p < 0.001). The decline in the CLABSI rate observed during P2 in comparison with P1 was independent of the insertion site (femoral or non-femoral; p = 0.054). The overall CLABSI rate increased to 2.73 (1.17-4.29) per 1,000 CVC-days with IRR of 0.67 (0.36-1.26, p = 0.212) in P3 compared to P1, but a high nursing turnover was observed in both hospitals.
Our intervention focused on external auditing and performance feedback resulted in significant reduction in rates of CLABSI. Investigation continues regarding the most effective way to sustain CLABSI prevention practices and to improve the culture of safety in healthcare.
我们分析了基于过程控制和绩效反馈的干预措施对降低中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)率的影响。这项研究于 2011 年 3 月至 2012 年 9 月在比利时的两家三级医院 A 和 B 的五个成人重症监护病房(ICU)进行,共有 53 张床位。
该研究分为三个阶段:P1(基线)、P2(干预)和 P3(干预后)。在 P2 期间,对 5 例中心静脉导管(CVC)护理关键过程进行外部监测,并对绩效指标(CLABSI 率、CVC 使用率、每个护理过程的依从率以及插入部位)每月进行报告(会议和反馈报告发布)给 ICU 工作人员。由同一名经过培训的研究护士评估过程措施的外部监测。使用泊松回归分析比较各阶段的 CLABSI 发病率密度率。双侧 p 值 <0.05 时达到统计学意义。对于分析,适当时将五个 ICU 分别在医院 A 和 B 中进行了分离。
手部卫生、CVC 处理和 CVC 敷料的总平均依从性显著提高。CLABSI 率从 P2 中的 4.00(95%置信区间(CI):1.94-6.06)降至 1.81(0.46-3.17)每 1000 个 CVC 天,发病率比(IRR)为 0.49(0.24-0.98,p = 0.043)。在医院 A 中观察到更好的反应,因为在每月会议上护士的参与率明显高于医院 B(p <0.001),而 ICU 发布的反馈报告的百分比(p <0.001)。与 P1 相比,P2 期间观察到的 CLABSI 率下降与插入部位无关(股或非股;p = 0.054)。与 P1 相比,P3 期间的总体 CLABSI 率增加至 2.73(1.17-4.29)每 1000 个 CVC 天,IRR 为 0.67(0.36-1.26,p = 0.212),但两家医院的护理人员流动率均较高。
我们的干预措施侧重于外部审计和绩效反馈,显著降低了 CLABSI 率。正在继续调查维持 CLABSI 预防措施和提高医疗保健安全文化的最有效方法。