• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房及内科-外科病房中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)的发生率

Prevalence of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) in Intensive Care and Medical-Surgical Units.

作者信息

Toor Harjyot, Farr Saman, Savla Paras, Kashyap Samir, Wang Sharon, Miulli Dan E

机构信息

Neurosurgery, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, USA.

Infectious Disease, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Mar 3;14(3):e22809. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22809. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.22809
PMID:35382174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8976505/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) remain an important preventable healthcare-associated infection with a 2020 rate of 0.87 (per 1,000 central line days) in the United States intensive care units (ICU).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients in our institution. The total number of central venous catheter (CVC) insertions and line days were determined using daily unit logs maintained by unit managers. Central line insertion practice (CLIP) compliance was calculated as the total number of CLIP forms submitted divided by the total number of newly-inserted CVCs with and without associated CLIP forms as determined by unit logs.

RESULTS

A total of 1,125 CVCs were reviewed (448 - ICU and 677 - medical-surgical units). Of the 13 CLABSI, one patient had internal jugular (IJ), one patient had subclavian (SC), four patients had femoral, three patients had peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and four patients had hemodialysis catheters. Patients with CLABSI had CVC inserted for a range of five to 92 days with the average number of line days being 29 days.

CONCLUSION

Based on the analysis of our CLABSI patient population, we recommend our institution implement the following criteria to decrease the prevalence of CLABSI: All patients receiving a CVC must adhere to CLIP documentation in all units, any femoral or HD CVC placed without a CLIP form should have the line changed within 48 hours, those patients with a femoral CVC or hemodialysis catheter in place for four days or greater with an abnormal WBC (<4.0 or >11 mg/dL) or abnormal temperature (<97.0F or >100.4F) should be considered for catheter exchange, and those patients with an IJ, SC, or PICC CVC in place for seven days or greater with an abnormal WBC or abnormal temperature should have the catheter changed.

摘要

背景

中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)仍然是一种重要的可预防的医疗相关感染,2020年美国重症监护病房(ICU)的发生率为每1000个中心静脉导管日0.87例。

方法

这是一项对本机构所有成年患者的回顾性队列研究。中心静脉导管(CVC)插入总数和置管天数通过各科室护士长维护的每日科室日志确定。中心静脉导管插入操作(CLIP)依从性计算方式为:提交的CLIP表格总数除以科室日志确定的新插入CVC总数(无论有无相关CLIP表格)。

结果

共审查了1125根CVC(448根在ICU,677根在内外科病房)。在13例CLABSI患者中,1例患者的感染源为颈内静脉(IJ),1例为锁骨下静脉(SC),4例为股静脉,3例为经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC),4例为血液透析导管。发生CLABSI的患者CVC置管时间为5至92天,平均置管天数为29天。

结论

基于对我们的CLABSI患者群体的分析,我们建议本机构实施以下标准以降低CLABSI的发生率:所有接受CVC的患者在所有科室都必须遵守CLIP记录,任何未填写CLIP表格而置入的股静脉或血液透析CVC应在48小时内更换导管,对于股静脉CVC或血液透析导管留置4天及以上且白细胞异常(<4.0或>11mg/dL)或体温异常(<97.0°F或>100.4°F)的患者应考虑更换导管,对于IJ、SC或PICC CVC留置7天及以上且白细胞或体温异常的患者应更换导管。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b75f/8976505/465d17b927b0/cureus-0014-00000022809-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b75f/8976505/ac25dac20a9b/cureus-0014-00000022809-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b75f/8976505/465d17b927b0/cureus-0014-00000022809-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b75f/8976505/ac25dac20a9b/cureus-0014-00000022809-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b75f/8976505/465d17b927b0/cureus-0014-00000022809-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) in Intensive Care and Medical-Surgical Units.重症监护病房及内科-外科病房中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)的发生率
Cureus. 2022 Mar 3;14(3):e22809. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22809. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients.与中心静脉导管相比,外周静脉置入中心静脉导管在危重症患者中降低血流感染风险。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Nov 9;11(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01180-1.
3
Emergency Department Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) Incidence in the Era of Prevention Practices.预防措施时代急诊科中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)的发生率
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;22(9):1048-55. doi: 10.1111/acem.12744.
4
Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis.外周置入中心静脉导管与中心静脉导管相比,与儿科重症监护患者的血流感染风险较低:一项倾向调整分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1097-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
5
Which central venous catheters have the highest rate of catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis: a prospective analysis of 2,128 catheter days in the surgical intensive care unit.哪种中心静脉导管相关深静脉血栓形成发生率最高:外科重症监护病房 2128 导管日的前瞻性分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Feb;74(2):454-60; discussion 461-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827a0b2f.
6
Comparison of Rates of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Patients With 1 vs 2 Central Venous Catheters.比较 1 根与 2 根中心静脉导管患者的中心静脉导管相关血流感染发生率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200396. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0396.
7
Peripherally inserted central catheters have a protective role and the effect of fluctuation curve feature in the risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters: a propensity-adjusted analysis.与中心静脉导管相比,外周置入中心静脉导管具有保护作用和波动曲线特征对血流感染风险的影响:倾向评分调整分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07265-x.
8
Multi-center prospective study on central line-associated bloodstream infections in 79 ICUs of China.中国 79 家 ICU 中心静脉相关血流感染的多中心前瞻性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 4;21(1):1208. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06871-5.
9
Effectiveness of Minocycline and Rifampin vs Chlorhexidine and Silver Sulfadiazine-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters in Preventing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in a High-Volume Academic Intensive Care Unit: A Before and after Trial.米诺环素和利福平与洗必泰及磺胺嘧啶银浸渍中央静脉导管在预防高容量学术性重症监护病房中心导管相关血流感染中的效果:一项前后对照试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Sep;221(3):739-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 May 27.
10
Peripherally inserted central venous catheters in the acute care setting: A safe alternative to high-risk short-term central venous catheters.在急性护理环境中使用外周置入中心静脉导管:一种替代高风险短期中心静脉导管的安全选择。
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Mar;38(2):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Compound lidocaine cream with warm compress for pain relief in ultrasound-guided peripherally inserted central catheter placement for cancer patients.复方利多卡因乳膏联合热敷用于癌症患者超声引导下经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管时的疼痛缓解
World J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;16(7):108173. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i7.108173.
2
Bacteriological Spectrum and Drug Resistance Among Patients Associated With Bloodstream Infection in Intensive Care Units in the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University From 2021 to 2023.2021年至2023年嘉兴学院附属医院重症监护病房血流感染患者的细菌学谱及耐药性
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2025 Jun 12;2025:7841940. doi: 10.1155/cjid/7841940. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on central-line-associated bloodstream infections during the early months of 2020, National Healthcare Safety Network.2020 年头几个月 COVID-19 大流行对中心静脉导管相关血流感染的影响,国家医疗保健安全网络。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;43(6):790-793. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.108. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
2
Ultrasound Guidance and Risk for Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections in the Intensive Care Unit: A Post Hoc Analysis of Individual Data of 3 Multicenter Randomized Trials.超声引导与 ICU 中心静脉导管相关感染风险:3 项多中心随机试验的个体数据事后分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):e1054-e1061. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1817.
3
Nurses' Knowledge and Behavior in Hospitals Regarding the Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review.
医院护士预防中心静脉导管相关血流感染的知识与行为:一项系统评价
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 May 30;11:23779608251347119. doi: 10.1177/23779608251347119. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Effectiveness of Vascular Catheter Removal Versus Retention in Non-ICU Patients with CRBSI or CABSI in Retrospective, Single-Center Study.回顾性单中心研究:血管导管移除与保留对非重症监护病房CRBSI或CABSI患者的有效性
Microorganisms. 2025 May 7;13(5):1085. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13051085.
5
Venous access devices (Review).静脉通路装置(综述)
Med Int (Lond). 2025 May 13;5(4):42. doi: 10.3892/mi.2025.241. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
6
Reassessing the Risk: A Retrospective Analysis of CLABSI Risk in Femoral, Internal Jugular, and Subclavian Central Venous Catheters.重新评估风险:股静脉、颈内静脉和锁骨下中心静脉导管相关血流感染风险的回顾性分析
Crit Care Res Pract. 2025 Apr 29;2025:8193419. doi: 10.1155/ccrp/8193419. eCollection 2025.
7
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in critical care: understanding incidence, and risk factors in Palestine.重症监护中的中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI):了解巴勒斯坦的发病率及危险因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10855-0.
8
Incidence, Compliance, and Risk Factor Associated with Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients: A Multicenter Study in an Upper Middle-Income Country.重症监护病房(ICU)患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)的发生率、依从性及危险因素:一个中高收入国家的多中心研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Mar 7;14(3):271. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030271.
9
Chlorhexidine Gluconate Treatment Adherence Among Nurses and Patients to Reduce Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections.葡萄糖酸氯己定治疗中护士与患者的依从性对减少中心静脉导管相关血流感染的作用
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Mar 14;29(2):E37-E46. doi: 10.1188/25.CJON.E37-E46.
10
Treating shock with norepinephrine administered in midline catheters in an intermediary care unit: a retrospective cohort study.在中级护理单元使用中线导管输注去甲肾上腺素治疗休克:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 30;14(12):e091311. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091311.
Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection and colonization: the impact of insertion site and distribution of multidrug-resistant pathogens.
中心静脉导管相关性血流感染和定植:置管部位和多药耐药病原体分布的影响。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Dec 1;9(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00851-1.
4
Trends in central-line-associated bloodstream infections and catheter-associated urinary tract infections in a large acute-care hospital system in New York City, 2016-2019.2016-2019 年纽约市一家大型急症护理医院系统中中心静脉导管相关血流感染和导管相关尿路感染的趋势。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;42(7):842-846. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.1293. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
5
Comparison of Rates of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Patients With 1 vs 2 Central Venous Catheters.比较 1 根与 2 根中心静脉导管患者的中心静脉导管相关血流感染发生率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200396. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0396.
6
Electronic health record solutions to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections by enhancing documentation of central line insertion practices, line days, and daily line necessity.电子健康记录解决方案通过加强中心静脉置管操作、置管天数和每日置管必要性的记录,以减少中心静脉导管相关血流感染。
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Apr 1;44(4):438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.036. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
7
Marked reduction in compliance with central line insertion practices (CLIP) when accounting for missing CLIP data and incomplete line capture.在考虑中心静脉置管操作(CLIP)数据缺失和置管记录不完整的情况下,CLIP的依从性显著降低。
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Feb;44(2):242-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
8
Attributable mortality of central line associated bloodstream infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.中心静脉导管相关血流感染的归因死亡率:系统评价与荟萃分析
Infection. 2015 Feb;43(1):29-36. doi: 10.1007/s15010-014-0689-y. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
9
Which central line insertion site is the least prone to infection?哪个中心静脉置管部位感染风险最低?
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;61(3):362-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
10
Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals.急性护理医院预防中心静脉导管相关血流感染的策略。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;29 Suppl 1:S22-30. doi: 10.1086/591059.