Suppr超能文献

思考与否,这就是问题所在:自传体记忆中抑制和反弹效应的个体差异。

To think or not to think, that is the question: individual differences in suppression and rebound effects in autobiographical memory.

作者信息

Noreen Saima, MacLeod Malcolm D

机构信息

School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews, South Street, Scotland KY16 9JP, UK.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jan;145:84-97. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

Abstract

Two studies explored the effects of forget instructions on autobiographical memory at immediate test and following delays of either 12-13 months, or 3-4 months. Using the Autobiographical Think/No-Think procedure (cf., Noreen & MacLeod, 2013), 24 never-depressed participants (Study 1) first generated 12 positive and 12 negative autobiographical memories and associated cues. Participants were then asked to recall the memory associated with some of the cues (i.e., 'think' condition), or to avoid saying or thinking about the memory associated with other cues (i.e., 'no-think' condition). Participants were then asked to recall the memories associated with all the cues at immediate test and following a delay of 12-13 months. Participants were found to be successful at forgetting both positive and negative autobiographical memories following 'no-think' instructions at immediate test but this forgetting effect did not persist following a 12-13 month delay. This pattern of remembering and forgetting was replicated in a second study (using 27 never-depressed participants) following a 3-4 month delay. Participants who had been less successful at forgetting 'no-think' memories at immediate test, were more likely to show rebound effects for those memories following a delay compared to memories which received neither 'think' nor 'no-think' instructions. Individual differences in inhibitory control and the efficacy of potential therapeutic interventions of 'no-think' instructions are considered.

摘要

两项研究探讨了“忘记指令”对即时测试以及12 - 13个月或3 - 4个月延迟后的自传体记忆的影响。采用自传体思考/不思考程序(参见,诺琳和麦克劳德,2013),24名从未患过抑郁症的参与者(研究1)首先生成了12个积极和12个消极的自传体记忆及相关线索。然后要求参与者回忆与某些线索相关的记忆(即“思考”条件),或者避免说出或思考与其他线索相关的记忆(即“不思考”条件)。随后要求参与者在即时测试以及12 - 13个月的延迟后回忆与所有线索相关的记忆。结果发现,参与者在即时测试接受“不思考”指令后能够成功忘记积极和消极的自传体记忆,但这种遗忘效应在12 - 13个月的延迟后并未持续。在第二项研究(使用27名从未患过抑郁症的参与者)中,经过3 - 4个月的延迟后,重复了这种记忆和遗忘模式。与既未接受“思考”也未接受“不思考”指令的记忆相比,那些在即时测试中较少成功忘记“不思考”记忆的参与者,在延迟后更有可能出现这些记忆的反弹效应。文中还考虑了抑制控制方面的个体差异以及“不思考”指令潜在治疗干预的效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验