• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为关系框架的层次分类。

Hierarchical classification as relational framing.

作者信息

Slattery Brian, Stewart Ian

机构信息

National University of Ireland, Galway.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):61-75. doi: 10.1002/jeab.63. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1002/jeab.63
PMID:24310480
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to model hierarchical classification as contextually controlled, generalized relational responding or relational framing. In Experiment 1, a training procedure involving nonarbitrarily related multidimensional stimuli was used to establish two arbitrary shapes as contextual cues for 'member of' and 'includes' relational responding, respectively. Subsequently those cues were used to establish a network of arbitrary stimuli in particular hierarchical relations with each other, and then test for derivation of further untrained hierarchical relations as well as for transformation of functions. Resultant patterns of relational framing showed properties of transitive class containment, asymmetrical class containment, and unilateral property induction, consistent with conceptions of hierarchical classification as described within the cognitive developmental literature. Experiment 2 extended the basic model by using "fuzzy category" stimuli and providing a better controlled test of transformation of functions. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.

摘要

本研究的目的是将层次分类建模为情境控制的、广义的关系反应或关系框架。在实验1中,采用了一种涉及非任意相关的多维刺激的训练程序,分别将两个任意形状作为“……的成员”和“包括”关系反应的情境线索。随后,这些线索被用于建立一个相互之间具有特定层次关系的任意刺激网络,然后测试进一步未经训练的层次关系的推导以及功能的转换。关系框架的结果模式显示出传递类包含、不对称类包含和单边属性归纳的特性,这与认知发展文献中所描述的层次分类概念一致。实验2通过使用“模糊类别”刺激扩展了基本模型,并对功能转换进行了更好控制的测试。讨论了局限性和未来的研究方向。

相似文献

1
Hierarchical classification as relational framing.作为关系框架的层次分类。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):61-75. doi: 10.1002/jeab.63. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
2
Testing for transitive class containment as a feature of hierarchical classification.作为层次分类的一个特征,对传递类包含关系进行测试。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Sep;96(2):243-60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-243.
3
Contextual control of stimulus generalization and stimulus equivalence in hierarchical categorization.层次分类中刺激泛化和刺激等效性的情境控制
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):433-47. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-433.
4
Multiple contextual control over non-arbitrary relational responding and a preliminary model of pragmatic verbal analysis.多种语境控制非任意关系反应和语用言语分析的初步模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Sep;100(2):174-86. doi: 10.1002/jeab.39. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
5
Relational coherence in ambiguous and unambiguous relational networks.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):76-93. doi: 10.1002/jeab.67. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
6
Enhanced equivalence class formation by the delay and relational functions of meaningful stimuli.有意义刺激的延迟和关系功能增强等价类的形成。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 May;103(3):524-41. doi: 10.1002/jeab.152.
7
Facilitating relational framing in children and individuals with developmental delay using the relational completion procedure.使用关系完成程序促进发育迟缓儿童和个体的关系框架形成。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):51-60. doi: 10.1002/jeab.66. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
8
A functional-analytic model of analogy: a relational frame analysis.类比的功能分析模型:关系框架分析
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):375-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.78-375.
9
Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding.刺激等价性与任意适用的关系反应。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):519-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-519.
10
Stimulus class formation and concept learning: establishment of within- and between-set generalization and transitive relationships via conditional discrimination procedures.刺激类的形成与概念学习:通过条件辨别程序建立集合内和集合间的泛化及传递关系。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jul;52(1):13-25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing Foundational Nonarbitrary Distinctive and Categorical Relational Responding in Children with Autism.在自闭症儿童中建立基础性的非随意性、独特性和范畴性的关系反应。
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 May 3;16(4):1163-1174. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00806-z. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Transformation of Hierarchical Multiply Controlled Verbal Relations in Children With Autism in a Game of I Spy.自闭症儿童在“我发现了”游戏中分层多重控制言语关系的转变
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Oct 31;15(4):1383-1389. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00391-0. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Values: A Core Guiding Principle for Behavior-Analytic Intervention and Research.
价值观:行为分析干预与研究的核心指导原则
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Jul 15;15(1):115-125. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00595-3. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
A Functional Contextual Account of Background Knowledge in Categorization: Implications for Artificial General Intelligence and Cognitive Accounts of General Knowledge.分类中背景知识的功能情境解释:对通用人工智能和常识认知解释的启示。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 2;13:745306. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.745306. eCollection 2022.
5
Derived Relational Responding and Transformations of Function in Children: A Review of Applied Behavior-Analytic Journals.儿童的派生关系反应与功能转换:应用行为分析期刊综述
Anal Verbal Behav. 2020 Mar 19;36(1):115-145. doi: 10.1007/s40616-019-00123-z. eCollection 2020 Jun.
6
RFT as a Functional Analytic Approach to Understanding the Complexities of Human Behavior: A Reply to Killeen and Jacobs.作为一种理解人类行为复杂性的功能分析方法的关系框架理论:对基林和雅各布斯的回应。
Behav Anal. 2017 May 9;40(1):65-74. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0099-4. eCollection 2017 Jun.