Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.D.F., C.D.J., S.C., J.F.C); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California (J.L.N.).
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Mar;16(3):361-71. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not223. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) contains a population of cells that exhibit stem cell phenotypes. These cancer stem cells (CSCs) may be a source of therapeutic resistance, although support for this important concept is limited.
We determined whether early-passage GBM CSCs respond differently than patient-matched, genotypically similar non-CSCs to clinically relevant single or serial doses of temozolomide (TMZ), radiation therapy (XRT), or alternating TMZ treatment and XRT, which is the standard of care for GBM patients.
Despite the phenotypic differences, including the presence of stem cell markers and formation of intracranial tumors, the CSCs and matched non-CSCs were equally resistant to TMZ in a majority of patients, using 2 independent assays. TMZ response was consistent with methylated O(6)-DNA methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) and MGMT protein levels in both culture types. In contrast, CSCs were unexpectedly more responsive to XRT compared with matched non-CSCs from 2 patients despite having relatively equal resistance to TMZ. However, for the majority of culture pairs from individual patients, responses in CSCs were indistinguishable from non-CSC cultures.
In our patient-matched primary cultures, response to TMZ was tightly linked to the individual tumor's MGMT status and independent of their phenotypic differences. TMZ and XRT together revealed no additive benefit compared with monotherapy for either culture type, in contrast to the notion that the CSC population is more resistant to XRT. If the tumor cell response in vitro mirrors therapeutic response in larger patient cohorts, these rapid assays in primary cultures could allow -empirical selection of efficacious therapeutic agents on a patient-specific basis.
多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)中存在具有干细胞表型的细胞群体。这些癌症干细胞(CSC)可能是治疗抵抗的来源,尽管这一重要概念的证据有限。
我们确定了早期传代的 GBM CSC 是否与患者匹配、遗传相似的非 CSC 对临床相关的单剂量或连续剂量替莫唑胺(TMZ)、放射治疗(XRT)或 TMZ 治疗和 XRT 交替治疗的反应不同,这是 GBM 患者的标准治疗方法。
尽管存在表型差异,包括存在干细胞标记物和颅内肿瘤的形成,但在大多数患者中,CSC 和匹配的非 CSC 对 TMZ 的耐药性相同,使用了 2 种独立的检测方法。TMZ 反应与两种培养类型中的甲基化 O(6)-DNA 甲基鸟嘌呤甲基转移酶(MGMT)和 MGMT 蛋白水平一致。相比之下,尽管 CSC 对 TMZ 的耐药性与匹配的非 CSC 相当,但与 2 例患者的匹配非 CSC 相比,CSC 对 XRT 的反应出人意料地更为敏感。然而,对于大多数来自单个患者的培养物对,CSC 的反应与非 CSC 培养物无法区分。
在我们患者匹配的原代培养物中,TMZ 的反应与个体肿瘤的 MGMT 状态紧密相关,与它们的表型差异无关。TMZ 和 XRT 联合治疗与单药治疗相比,对两种培养物类型均无额外获益,这与 CSC 群体对 XRT 更具耐药性的观点相反。如果体外肿瘤细胞反应反映了更大患者群体中的治疗反应,那么这些原代培养物中的快速检测可以允许根据患者的具体情况,选择有效的治疗药物。