APHM, Timone Hospital, Departement of Neuro-Oncology, Marseille, France (E.T.); L'institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, Marseille, France (E.T., A.G.); APHM, Timone Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Marseille, France (P.M.); L'institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Biostatistics, Marseille, France (B.E.); UMR911, CRO2, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France (P.M.); L'institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Anatomic Pathology, Marseille, France (E.C.-J.); L'institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Radiotherapy, Marseille, France (A.T.).
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Mar;16(3):421-8. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not200. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common cause of brain metastases (BM). Optimal management of BM from BC is still debated. In an attempt to provide appropriate treatment and to assist with optimal patient selection, several specific prognostic classifications for BM from BC have been established. We evaluated the prognostic value and validity of the 6 proposed scoring systems in an independent population of BC patients with BM.
We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive BC patients referred to our institution for newly diagnosed BM between October 1995 and July 2011 (n = 149). Each of the 6 scores proposed for BM from BC (Sperduto, Niwinska, Park, Nieder, Le Scodan, and Claude) was applied to this population. The discriminative ability of each score was assessed using the Brier score and the C-index. Individual prognostic values of clinical and histological factors were analyzed using uni- and multivariate analyses.
Median overall survival was 15.1 months (95% CI,11.5-18.7). Sperduto-GPA (P < .001), Nieder (P < .001), Park (P < .001), Claude (P < .001), Niwinska (P < .001), and Le Scodan (P = .034) scores all showed significant prognostic value. The Nieder score showed the best discriminative ability (C-index, 0.672; Brier score error reduction, 16.1%).
The majority of prognostic scores were relevant for patients with BM from BC in our independent population, and the Nieder score seems to present the best predictive value but showed a relatively low positive predictive value. Thus, these results remain insufficient and challenge the routine use of these scoring systems.
乳腺癌(BC)是脑转移(BM)的第二大常见原因。BC 脑转移的最佳治疗方案仍存在争议。为了提供适当的治疗并协助最佳患者选择,已经建立了几种针对 BC 脑转移的特定预后分类。我们评估了 6 种特定的 BC 脑转移评分系统在独立的 BC 脑转移患者人群中的预后价值和有效性。
我们回顾性分析了 1995 年 10 月至 2011 年 7 月期间我院收治的 149 例新诊断为 BM 的 BC 患者的连续病例。将 6 种针对 BC 脑转移的评分系统(Sperduto、Niwinska、Park、Nieder、Le Scodan 和 Claude)分别应用于该人群。使用 Brier 评分和 C 指数评估每种评分的区分能力。使用单变量和多变量分析评估临床和组织学因素的个体预后价值。
中位总生存期为 15.1 个月(95%CI,11.5-18.7)。Sperduto-GPA(P<0.001)、Nieder(P<0.001)、Park(P<0.001)、Claude(P<0.001)、Niwinska(P<0.001)和 Le Scodan(P=0.034)评分均具有显著的预后价值。Nieder 评分具有最佳的区分能力(C 指数为 0.672;Brier 评分误差减少 16.1%)。
在我们的独立患者人群中,大多数预后评分与 BC 脑转移患者相关,Nieder 评分似乎具有最佳的预测价值,但阳性预测值相对较低。因此,这些结果仍然不足,对这些评分系统的常规使用提出了挑战。