Almekhlafi Mohammed A, Hockley Aaron, Desai Jamsheed A, Nambiar Vivek, Mishra Sachin, Volny Ondrej, Eesa Muneer, Demchuk Andrew M, Menon Bijoy K, Goyal Mayank
Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Western, Saudi Arabia.
Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 Dec;6(10):729-32. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011000. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
Stentrievers have resulted in faster recanalization times in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Nonetheless, when strokes occur during evenings and weekends, delays are introduced in achieving this goal. We assessed the feasibility of achieving fast and successful endovascular reperfusion in patients with stroke treated during evenings and weekends and whether this has an impact on the outcome.
A retrospective review was performed of a longitudinal database of patients with acute anterior ischemic stroke treated with endovascular therapy in a comprehensive stroke center between January 2011 and December 2012. The imaging to reperfusion time was defined as the time from completion of the unenhanced CT scan to the time of angiographic successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3). This time interval was compared between patients treated during working hours (Monday to Friday 07:00-18:00 h) and those treated in the evening outside these hours and at weekends. The 24-h NIH Stroke Scale score and 90-day favorable outcome score (modified Rankin scale ≤2) were compared between the two groups.
In a cohort of 110 patients, 56 (50.9%) were treated on evenings and weekends. The median imaging to reperfusion time in these patients was 111 min compared with 90 min during working hours (p=0.019). The proportion of patients with successful reperfusion (TICI 2b or 3) during the evenings and weekends was 82.1% compared with 76.7% during working hours (p=0.4). The proportion of patients with a 90-day favorable outcome was not significantly different in the two groups (64.3% in those treated during evenings and weekends vs 52.1% in working hours, p=0.2).
Some delays were encountered during evenings and weekend hours. Despite that, it was feasible to achieve a relatively short imaging to reperfusion times during these hours, in comparison to existing literature. A target universal time metric is needed to assess the timeliness of endovascular therapy in stroke centers.
取栓支架已使急性缺血性中风患者的再通时间更快。尽管如此,当在傍晚和周末发生中风时,实现这一目标会出现延误。我们评估了在傍晚和周末接受治疗的中风患者实现快速且成功的血管内再灌注的可行性,以及这是否会对预后产生影响。
对2011年1月至2012年12月在一家综合中风中心接受血管内治疗的急性前循环缺血性中风患者的纵向数据库进行回顾性分析。影像至再灌注时间定义为从完成平扫CT扫描到血管造影成功再灌注(脑梗死溶栓分级2b - 3级)的时间。将工作时间(周一至周五07:00 - 18:00)接受治疗的患者与在这些时间之外的傍晚及周末接受治疗的患者的该时间间隔进行比较。比较两组患者的24小时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分和90天良好预后评分(改良Rankin量表≤2)。
在110例患者队列中,56例(50.9%)在傍晚和周末接受治疗。这些患者的影像至再灌注时间中位数为111分钟,而工作时间为90分钟(p = 0.019)。傍晚和周末成功再灌注(脑梗死溶栓分级2b或3级)的患者比例为82.1%,工作时间为76.7%(p = 0.4)。两组患者90天良好预后的比例无显著差异(傍晚和周末治疗的患者为64.3%,工作时间为52.1%,p = 0.2)。
在傍晚和周末时段出现了一些延误。尽管如此,与现有文献相比,在这些时段实现相对较短的影像至再灌注时间是可行的。需要一个通用的目标时间指标来评估中风中心血管内治疗的及时性。