Raymond Scott B, Akbik Feras, Stapleton Christopher J, Mehta Brijesh P, Chandra Ronil V, Gonzalez Roberto G, Rabinov James D, Schwamm Lee H, Patel Aman B, Hirsch Joshua A, Leslie-Mazwi Thabele M
Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 18;9:1106. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01106. eCollection 2018.
The weekend effect is a well-recognized phenomenon in which patient outcomes worsen for acute strokes presenting outside routine business hours. This is attributed to non-uniform availability of services throughout the week and evenings and, though described for intravenous thrombolysis candidates, is poorly understood for endovascular stroke care. We evaluated the impact of institutional protocols on the weekend effect, and the speed and outcome of endovascular therapy as a function of time of presentation. This study assesses a prospective observational cohort of 129 consecutive patients. Patients were grouped based on the time of presentation during regular work hours (Monday through Friday, 07:00-19:00 h) vs. off-hours (overnight 19:00-07:00 h and weekends) and assessed for treatment latency and outcome. Treatment latencies did not depend on the time of presentation. The door to imaging interval was comparable during regular and off-hours (median time 21 vs. 19 min, respectively, < 0.50). Imaging to groin puncture was comparable (71 vs. 71 min, < 1.0), as were angiographic and functional outcomes. Additionally, treatment intervals decreased with increased protocol experience; door-to-puncture interval significantly decreased from the first to the fourth quarters of the study period (115 vs. 94 min, respectively, < 0.006), with the effect primarily seen during off-hours with a 28% reduction in median door-to-puncture times. Institutional protocols help diminish the weekend effect in endovascular stroke treatment. This is driven largely by improvement in off-hours performance, with protocol adherence leading to further decreases in treatment intervals over time.
周末效应是一种广为人知的现象,即急性中风患者在非日常工作时间就诊时,其预后会变差。这归因于一周内及晚上服务的可及性不一致,并且,尽管这一现象在静脉溶栓候选患者中已有描述,但对于血管内中风治疗却知之甚少。我们评估了机构方案对周末效应的影响,以及血管内治疗的速度和结局与就诊时间的关系。本研究评估了129例连续患者的前瞻性观察队列。患者根据在正常工作时间(周一至周五,07:00 - 19:00)与非工作时间(夜间19:00 - 07:00及周末)的就诊时间分组,并评估治疗延迟和结局。治疗延迟并不取决于就诊时间。正常工作时间和非工作时间从就诊到成像的间隔相当(中位数时间分别为21分钟和19分钟,<0.50)。成像到腹股沟穿刺的时间相当(71分钟对71分钟,<1.0),血管造影和功能结局也是如此。此外,治疗间隔随着方案经验的增加而缩短;从研究期的第一季度到第四季度门到穿刺间隔显著缩短(分别为115分钟和94分钟,<0.006),这种效应主要在非工作时间出现,门到穿刺的中位时间减少了28%。机构方案有助于减少血管内中风治疗中的周末效应。这在很大程度上是由非工作时间表现的改善所驱动的,随着时间的推移,遵循方案会导致治疗间隔进一步缩短。