• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The reach ratio--a new indicator for comparing quitline reach into smoking subgroups.到达率比--一个新的指标,用于比较戒烟热线对吸烟亚组的覆盖范围。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Apr;16(4):491-5. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt192. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
2
Improving smoking cessation support for Quebec's smokers: an evaluation of Quebec's telephone quitline.改善魁北克吸烟者的戒烟支持:对魁北克戒烟热线的评估。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2021 Jul-Aug;41(7-8):222-229. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.41.7/8.03.
3
The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers' Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York.纽约州戒烟热线对纽约州人群吸烟率的潜在影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 14;16(22):4477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224477.
4
Race/Ethnic Variations in Quitline Use Among US Adult Tobacco Users in 45 States, 2011-2013.45 个州 2011-2013 年美国成年烟草使用者中戒烟热线使用的种族/民族差异。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Nov 7;19(12):1473-1481. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw281.
5
Comparing the New York State Smokers' Quitline Reach, Services Offered, and Quit Outcomes to 44 Other State Quitlines, 2010 to 2015.2010年至2015年期间,将纽约州戒烟热线的覆盖范围、提供的服务及戒烟成果与其他44个州的戒烟热线进行比较。
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Jun;32(5):1264-1272. doi: 10.1177/0890117117724898. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
6
Aboriginal users of Canadian quitlines: an exploratory analysis.加拿大戒烟热线的原住民用户:一项探索性分析。
Tob Control. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i60-4. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.020115.
7
Impact of Canadian tobacco packaging policy on quitline reach and reach equity.加拿大烟草包装政策对戒烟热线覆盖范围及覆盖公平性的影响。
Prev Med. 2015 Dec;81:243-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
8
Cessation among state quitline participants with a mental health condition.患有精神疾病的州戒烟热线参与者的戒烟情况。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Jun;17(6):735-41. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu239. Epub 2014 Nov 9.
9
Increasing the reach of quitlines through active telephone recruitment: do cold-called smokers differ from quitline callers?通过主动电话招募扩大戒烟热线的服务范围:被随机呼叫的吸烟者与戒烟热线来电者有何不同?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Dec;14(12):1488-93. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr317. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
10
Barriers to Telephone Quitline Use Among Methadone-Maintained Smokers.美沙酮维持治疗吸烟者使用电话戒烟热线的障碍
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Aug;17(8):931-6. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu267.

引用本文的文献

1
Achieving Equity in the Reach of Smoking Cessation Services Within the NCI Cancer Moonshot-Funded Cancer Center Cessation Initiative.在国立癌症研究所“癌症登月计划”资助的癌症中心戒烟倡议中实现戒烟服务覆盖范围的公平性。
Health Equity. 2021 Jun 16;5(1):424-430. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0157. eCollection 2021.
2
A synthesis of the literature to inform vaping cessation interventions for young adults.综述文献以提供针对年轻成年人的电子烟戒烟干预措施。
Addict Behav. 2021 Aug;119:106898. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106898. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Impact of population tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: a systematic review and appraisal of future research directions.人群烟草控制干预措施对吸烟方面社会经济不平等的影响:一项系统综述及对未来研究方向的评估
Tob Control. 2020 Sep 29;30(e2):e87-95. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055874.
4
Characteristics and Reach Equity of Policies Restricting Flavored Tobacco Product Sales in the United States.美国限制调味烟草产品销售政策的特点及公平性覆盖范围
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1_suppl):44S-53S. doi: 10.1177/1524839919879928.
5
The Potential Impact of the New York State Smokers' Quitline on Population-Level Smoking Rates in New York.纽约州戒烟热线对纽约州人群吸烟率的潜在影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 14;16(22):4477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224477.
6
Geographic Representativeness of a Web-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention: Reach Equity Analysis.基于网络的戒烟干预措施的地理代表性:覆盖公平性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 24;20(10):e11668. doi: 10.2196/11668.

本文引用的文献

1
Recommended confidence intervals for two independent binomial proportions.两个独立二项比例的推荐置信区间。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Apr;24(2):224-54. doi: 10.1177/0962280211415469. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
2
African American participation and success in telephone counseling for smoking cessation.非裔美国人参与并成功完成电话戒烟咨询。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Feb;14(2):240-2. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr129. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
3
Rates and reasons: disparities in low intentions to use a state smoking cessation quitline.使用率和原因:低意向使用州戒烟热线的差异。
Am J Health Promot. 2011 May-Jun;25(5 Suppl):S59-65. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.100611-QUAN-183.
4
Quitline utilization rates of African-American and white smokers: the California experience.非裔美国烟民和白种烟民的戒烟热线利用率:加州经验。
Am J Health Promot. 2011 May-Jun;25(5 Suppl):S51-8. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.100611-QUAN-185.
5
Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence vs heavy smoking index in a general population survey.在一项普通人群调查中,尼古丁依赖 Fagerstrom 测试与重度吸烟指数的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec 30;9:493. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-493.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in smoking-cessation interventions: analysis of the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.戒烟干预措施中的种族和民族差异:对2005年美国国家健康访谈调查的分析
Am J Prev Med. 2008 May;34(5):404-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.02.003.
7
Characteristics of smokers calling a national reactive telephone helpline.拨打全国应急电话热线的吸烟者的特征。
Am J Health Promot. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(3):176-9. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.22.3.176.
8
Minimal dataset for quitlines: a best practice.戒烟热线的最小数据集:最佳实践
Tob Control. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i16-20. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.019976.
9
Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change.应用RE-AIM框架评估政策变化对公共卫生的影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Oct;34(2):105-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02872666.
10
Identifying health disparities across the tobacco continuum.识别烟草连续体中的健康差异。
Addiction. 2007 Oct;102 Suppl 2:5-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01952.x.

到达率比--一个新的指标,用于比较戒烟热线对吸烟亚组的覆盖范围。

The reach ratio--a new indicator for comparing quitline reach into smoking subgroups.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada;

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Apr;16(4):491-5. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt192. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntt192
PMID:24311698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3954428/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is growing concern about population disparities in tobacco-related morbidity and mortality. This paper introduces the reach ratio as a complementary measure to reach for monitoring whether quitline interventions are reaching high risk groups of smokers proportionate to their prevalence in the population.

METHODS

Data on smokers were collected at intake by 7 Canadian provincial quitlines from 2007 to 2009 and grouped to identify 4 high risk subgroups: males, young adults, heavy smokers, and those with low education. Provincial data are from the Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey. Reach ratios (ReRas), defined as the proportion of quitline callers from a subgroup divided by the proportion of the smoking population in the subgroup, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the subgroups. A ReRa of 1.0 indicates proportionate representation.

RESULTS

ReRas for male smokers and young adults are consistently less than 1.0 across all provinces, indicating that a lower proportion of these high-risk smokers were receiving evidence-based smoking cessation treatment from quitlines. Those with high levels of tobacco addiction and less than high school education have ReRas greater than 1.0, indicating that a greater proportion of these smokers were receiving cessation treatments.

CONCLUSION

ReRas complement other measures of reach and provide a standardized estimate of the extent to which subgroups of interest are benefiting from available cessation interventions. This information can help quitline operators, funders, and policymakers determine the need for promotional strategies targeted to high risk subgroups, and allocate resources to meet program and policy objectives.

摘要

引言

人们越来越关注与烟草相关的发病率和死亡率方面的人口差异。本文引入可达比(reach ratio)作为一种补充措施,用于监测戒烟热线干预是否能够按照其在人群中的流行程度,为高危吸烟人群提供服务。

方法

2007 年至 2009 年,7 个加拿大省级戒烟热线通过加拿大烟草使用监测调查收集了吸烟者的入组数据,并将其分组,以确定 4 个高危亚组:男性、年轻人、重度吸烟者和受教育程度较低者。定义可达比(ReRa)为亚组中戒烟热线呼叫者的比例除以亚组中吸烟者的比例,并计算亚组的 95%置信区间。ReRa 为 1.0 表示比例适当。

结果

在所有省份,男性吸烟者和年轻人的 ReRa 均持续低于 1.0,这表明这些高危吸烟者接受戒烟热线提供的基于证据的戒烟治疗的比例较低。那些烟草成瘾程度高且受教育程度低于高中的人,其 ReRa 大于 1.0,这表明这些吸烟者接受戒烟治疗的比例更高。

结论

ReRa 补充了可达性的其他衡量标准,并提供了一个标准化的估计,即有兴趣的亚组从现有的戒烟干预措施中受益的程度。这些信息可以帮助戒烟热线运营商、资助者和决策者确定针对高危亚组的宣传策略的需求,并分配资源以实现计划和政策目标。