• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两个独立二项比例的推荐置信区间。

Recommended confidence intervals for two independent binomial proportions.

作者信息

Fagerland Morten W, Lydersen Stian, Laake Petter

机构信息

Unit of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Apr;24(2):224-54. doi: 10.1177/0962280211415469. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1177/0962280211415469
PMID:21996567
Abstract

The relationship between two independent binomial proportions is commonly estimated and presented using the difference between proportions, the number needed to treat, the ratio of proportions or the odds ratio. Several different confidence intervals are available, but they can produce markedly different results. Some of the traditional approaches, such as the Wald interval for the difference between proportions and the Katz log interval for the ratio of proportions, do not perform well unless the sample size is large. Better intervals are available. This article describes and compares approximate and exact confidence intervals that are - with one exception - easy to calculate or available in common software packages. We illustrate the performances of the intervals and make recommendations for both small and moderate-to-large sample sizes.

摘要

两个独立二项比例之间的关系通常使用比例之差、治疗所需人数、比例之比或比值比来估计和呈现。有几种不同的置信区间可供使用,但它们可能会产生明显不同的结果。一些传统方法,如比例之差的Wald区间和比例之比的Katz对数区间,除非样本量很大,否则表现不佳。有更好的区间可供选择。本文描述并比较了近似置信区间和精确置信区间,除了一个例外,这些区间易于计算或可在常用软件包中获得。我们展示了这些区间的性能,并针对小样本和中等到大样本给出了建议。

相似文献

1
Recommended confidence intervals for two independent binomial proportions.两个独立二项比例的推荐置信区间。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Apr;24(2):224-54. doi: 10.1177/0962280211415469. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
2
Exact confidence intervals for the relative risk and the odds ratio.相对风险和比值比的精确置信区间。
Biometrics. 2015 Dec;71(4):985-95. doi: 10.1111/biom.12360. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
3
Confidence intervals for the difference between independent binomial proportions: comparison using a graphical approach and moving averages.独立二项比例差异的置信区间:使用图形方法和移动平均线进行比较
Pharm Stat. 2014 Sep-Oct;13(5):294-308. doi: 10.1002/pst.1631. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
4
Confidence intervals for a ratio of two independent binomial proportions.两个独立二项比例之比的置信区间。
Stat Med. 2008 Nov 20;27(26):5497-508. doi: 10.1002/sim.3376.
5
Confidence intervals for a ratio of binomial proportions based on paired data.基于配对数据的二项比例比值的置信区间。
Stat Med. 2006 Sep 15;25(17):3039-47. doi: 10.1002/sim.2440.
6
Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验中二元比例多对一比较的渐近同时置信区间。
J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19(2):292-310. doi: 10.1080/10543400802622501.
7
Fully specified bootstrap confidence intervals for the difference of two independent binomial proportions based on the median unbiased estimator.基于中位数无偏估计量的两个独立二项比例之差的完全指定的自助置信区间。
Stat Med. 2009 Oct 15;28(23):2876-90. doi: 10.1002/sim.3670.
8
Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameters.用于比较二项分布参数的同时置信区间。
Biometrics. 2008 Dec;64(4):1270-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.00990.x. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
9
Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.小样本配对研究中比例差异的置信区间构建
Stat Med. 2005 Dec 15;24(23):3565-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.2216.
10
Confidence intervals based on some weighting functions for the difference of two binomial proportions.基于某些加权函数的两个二项式比例差的置信区间。
Stat Med. 2014 Jun 15;33(13):2288-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.6147. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Confidence Intervals for Adaptive Trial Designs II: Case Study and Practical Guidance.适应性试验设计的置信区间II:案例研究与实践指南。
Stat Med. 2025 Aug;44(18-19):e70202. doi: 10.1002/sim.70202.
2
Obtaining Valid Compatibility Intervals for Sequence Symmetry Analyses Utilizing Active Comparators: A Simulation Study.利用活性对照进行序列对称性分析时获得有效兼容性区间:一项模拟研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70160. doi: 10.1002/pds.70160.
3
Prevalence and comorbidity of mental disorders among young adults with a history of residential youth care - a two-wave longitudinal study of stability and change.
有青少年寄养史的年轻人中精神障碍的患病率及共病情况——一项关于稳定性和变化的两阶段纵向研究
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Apr 27. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02007-x.
4
Sample size recalculation based on the overall success rate in a randomized test-treatment trial with restricting randomization to discordant pairs.在一项将随机化限制在不一致配对的随机试验治疗试验中,基于总体成功率进行样本量重新计算。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02410-3.
5
The severity of second-degree perineal tears and dyspareunia during one year postpartum: A prospective cohort study.产后一年内二度会阴撕裂的严重程度与性交困难:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 May;104(5):968-975. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15084. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
6
Association Between Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in (), , and Genes with Severe Symptoms in Children Presenting COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎患儿中()、、和基因单核苷酸多态性与严重症状之间的关联。 (注:原文括号处内容缺失)
Viruses. 2024 Dec 30;17(1):35. doi: 10.3390/v17010035.
7
Surgeon Recommendation and Outcomes of Decompression With vs Without Fusion in Patients With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.退行性腰椎滑脱症患者减压术联合与不联合融合术的外科医生建议及疗效
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453466. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53466.
8
Comparison of causes of stillbirth and child deaths as determined by verbal autopsy and minimally invasive tissue sampling.通过死因推断和微创组织采样确定的死产和儿童死亡原因的比较。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 29;4(7):e0003065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003065. eCollection 2024.
9
PERFECTRA: a pragmatic, multicentre, real-life study comparing treat-to-target strategies with baricitinib versus TNF inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after failure on csDMARDs.PERFECTRA:一项实用的、多中心、真实世界的研究,比较了在 csDMARDs 治疗失败后的活动性类风湿关节炎患者中,以目标为导向的治疗策略与巴瑞替尼和 TNF 抑制剂的疗效。
RMD Open. 2024 May 30;10(2):e004291. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004291.
10
Seroprevalence and renal carriage of pathogenic Leptospira in livestock in Cotonou, Benin.贝宁科托努的牲畜中致病性钩端螺旋体的血清流行率和肾脏携带情况。
Vet Med Sci. 2024 May;10(3):e1430. doi: 10.1002/vms3.1430.