1 Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Center for Human Genomics, Winston Salem, North Carolina; and.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Dec;10 Suppl(Suppl):S118-24. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201309-307AW.
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute has sponsored several asthma clinical networks, but the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) is unique, because it is not a clinical trials network, and it includes both adults and children. Investigators in SARP have comprehensively characterized 1,644 patients with asthma over the past 10 years, including 583 individuals with severe asthma and 300 children below the age of 18 years. The diversity in clinical characteristics, physiologic measures, and biomarkers in a large number of subjects across the ages provides an ideal cohort in which to investigate asthma heterogeneity. Using both biased and unbiased approaches, multiple asthma phenotypes have been described in SARP. These phenotypic analyses have improved our understanding of heterogeneity in asthma, and may provide a starting point to transform clinical practice through the evidence-based classification of disease severity. Although these new phenotypes strive to make order out of a heterogeneous group of patients, they are limited by that heterogeneity. There may be large groups of patients, especially those with milder asthma, that can be grouped into a clinical phenotype to guide therapy, but there will always be patients on the "edge" of a phenotype who will not fit into these groupings. In the SARP cluster analysis, subjects on the "edge" of a phenotype frequently had lung function that was better or worse than other subjects in the same cluster, despite similar clinical characteristics. This suggests that different pathophysiologic mechanisms may be responsible for decrements in lung function in some subjects. This is extremely important for subjects with severe asthma who may be on the "edge" of two phenotypes that may be driven by different pathobiologic mechanisms that warrant different therapeutic approaches.
美国国立心肺血液研究所已经资助了多个哮喘临床网络,但严重哮喘研究计划(SARP)是独一无二的,因为它不是一个临床试验网络,它同时包括了成年人和儿童。SARP 的研究人员在过去 10 年中全面描述了 1644 名哮喘患者,其中包括 583 名重症哮喘患者和 300 名 18 岁以下的儿童。大量不同年龄段的患者在临床特征、生理指标和生物标志物方面的多样性为研究哮喘异质性提供了一个理想的队列。通过有偏见和无偏见的方法,SARP 中已经描述了多种哮喘表型。这些表型分析提高了我们对哮喘异质性的认识,并可能通过基于证据的疾病严重程度分类为临床实践提供一个起点。尽管这些新的表型试图从一组异质性的患者中找到规律,但它们受到异质性的限制。可能有很大一部分患者,尤其是那些病情较轻的患者,可以分为一个临床表型来指导治疗,但总会有一些处于表型“边缘”的患者无法归入这些分组。在 SARP 的聚类分析中,尽管表型相同的不同亚群患者的临床特征相似,但处于表型“边缘”的患者的肺功能通常比其他患者更好或更差。这表明,不同的病理生理机制可能导致某些患者的肺功能下降。对于那些可能处于两种表型“边缘”的重症哮喘患者来说,这一点极其重要,这两种表型可能是由不同的病理生物学机制驱动的,需要不同的治疗方法。