• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

变应原免疫治疗与过敏性鼻炎:错误观念。

Allergen immunotherapy and allergic rhinitis: false beliefs.

机构信息

Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London - National Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton Hospital, Dovehouse Street, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2013 Dec 5;11:255. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-255.

DOI:10.1186/1741-7015-11-255
PMID:24314210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4029303/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last 100 years, several persistent misconceptions or 'false beliefs' have built up around allergen immunotherapy and its use in allergic rhinitis. This is perhaps because enthusiastic physicians administered complex allergen extracts to a diverse population of patients suffering from heterogeneous atopic conditions. Here, we review evidence that counters seven of these 'false beliefs.'

DISCUSSION

  1. The symptoms of allergic rhinitis can be more heterogeneous, more severe and more troublesome in everyday life than many physicians believe. Large-scale epidemiological surveys show that the majority of allergic rhinitis patients have at least one symptom severe enough to interfere with sleep quality, productivity and/or well-being. 2. Allergen immunotherapy is not necessarily suitable for all allergic rhinitis patients (notably those with mild symptoms). Recent evidence from double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials suggests that the more severe the disease, the greater the treatment effect. 3. Allergen immunotherapy is often accused of lack of efficacy (relative to pharmacotherapy, for example). However, there are now many meta-analyses, systematic reviews and high-quality clinical trials that find overwhelmingly in favor of the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy (including sublingual formulations) in allergic rhinitis induced by pollen and, increasingly, other allergens. 4. Natural-exposure and challenge-chamber trials have shown that symptom relief may become apparent within months or even weeks of the initiation of allergen immunotherapy. 5. In pollen-induced allergic rhinitis, several years of subcutaneous or sublingual allergen immunotherapy are associated with sustained clinical efficacy after subsequent treatment cessation - confirming the disease-modifying nature of this therapy. 6. Most patients seeking treatment for allergic rhinitis are polysensitized, and allergen immunotherapy has proven efficacy in large, robust clinical trials in these groups. Polysensitization is not a contraindication to allergen immunotherapy. 7. Sublingual allergen immunotherapy is safe for home administration. A recent review calculated that 1 billion doses were administered worldwide between 2000 and 2010 and found that the 11 case reports of anaphylaxis (all non-fatal) corresponded to non-standard practice.

SUMMARY

Modern, evidence-based medicine has generated more than enough robust evidence to remove misconceptions about allergen immunotherapy and allergic rhinitis.

摘要

背景

在过去的 100 年里,过敏原免疫疗法及其在过敏性鼻炎中的应用产生了一些持久的误解或“错误信念”。这也许是因为热情的医生给患有不同特应性疾病的患者使用了复杂的过敏原提取物。在这里,我们回顾了一些证据,这些证据反驳了其中的七个“错误信念”。

讨论

  1. 过敏性鼻炎的症状比许多医生认为的更具异质性、更严重且更困扰日常生活。大规模的流行病学调查表明,大多数过敏性鼻炎患者至少有一种症状严重到足以影响睡眠质量、生产力和/或幸福感。2. 过敏原免疫疗法不一定适合所有过敏性鼻炎患者(尤其是那些症状较轻的患者)。最近的双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验的证据表明,疾病越严重,治疗效果越大。3. 过敏原免疫疗法经常被指责为缺乏疗效(与药物治疗相比,例如)。然而,现在有许多荟萃分析、系统评价和高质量的临床试验发现,过敏原免疫疗法(包括舌下制剂)在花粉引起的过敏性鼻炎中,以及越来越多的其他过敏原引起的过敏性鼻炎中,疗效非常显著。4. 自然暴露和挑战舱试验表明,过敏原免疫疗法开始后几个月甚至几周内,症状可能会得到缓解。5. 在花粉引起的过敏性鼻炎中,皮下或舌下过敏原免疫疗法数年的治疗与随后停止治疗后的持续临床疗效相关-证实了这种疗法的疾病修饰性质。6. 大多数寻求过敏性鼻炎治疗的患者均为多敏患者,过敏原免疫疗法在这些人群的大型、稳健临床试验中已被证明有效。多敏不是过敏原免疫疗法的禁忌症。7. 舌下过敏原免疫疗法可安全在家中使用。最近的一项综述计算了 2000 年至 2010 年期间全球共进行了 10 亿剂的治疗,并发现了 11 例过敏反应(均非致命)的病例报告,这与非标准做法相对应。

总结

现代循证医学已经产生了足够多的有力证据,消除了人们对过敏原免疫疗法和过敏性鼻炎的误解。

相似文献

1
Allergen immunotherapy and allergic rhinitis: false beliefs.变应原免疫治疗与过敏性鼻炎:错误观念。
BMC Med. 2013 Dec 5;11:255. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-255.
2
Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis.过敏性鼻炎的舌下免疫疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD002893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002893.
3
Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.舌下免疫疗法治疗变应性鼻炎:系统评价与Meta分析
Allergy. 2005 Jan;60(1):4-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00699.x.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous and Sublingual Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis and Asthma.皮下和舌下免疫疗法治疗变应性鼻结膜炎和哮喘的疗效与安全性
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;50(6):1111-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
5
Allergen injection immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis.季节性变应性鼻炎的变应原注射免疫疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD001936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001936.pub2.
6
Subcutaneous immunotherapy versus sublingual immunotherapy: which is more effective?皮下免疫治疗与舌下免疫治疗:哪种更有效?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Mar-Apr;2(2):144-9; quiz 150-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.11.018.
7
Multiallergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis and asthma.用于过敏性鼻炎和哮喘的多过敏原免疫疗法。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Apr;123(4):763-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.12.013. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
8
An evidence-based analysis of house dust mite allergen immunotherapy: a call for more rigorous clinical studies.基于证据的室内尘螨变应原免疫治疗分析:呼吁开展更严格的临床研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1322-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
9
Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Sublingual Immunotherapy for House Dust Mite Allergy: A Network Meta-Analysis-Based Comparison.皮下免疫治疗和舌下免疫治疗尘螨变应性的疗效:基于网状Meta 分析的比较。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Dec;9(12):4450-4458.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.08.018. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
10
Allergen immunotherapy for long-term tolerance and prevention.变应原免疫疗法促进长期耐受与预防。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar;149(3):802-811. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Allergen immunotherapy in Italy: How, when, and why-A real-world study conducted through a patient association.意大利的变应原免疫疗法:方式、时机及原因——一项通过患者协会开展的真实世界研究
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Dec 24;18(1):101015. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.101015. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
The beliefs about allergic rhinitis and its treatment options from people in Central Thailand.泰国中部地区民众对过敏性鼻炎及其治疗方法的看法。
Asia Pac Allergy. 2022 Jan 26;12(1):e11. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e11. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
A review of clinical efficacy, safety, new developments and adherence to allergen-specific immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis caused by allergy to ragweed pollen ().对豚草花粉过敏所致过敏性鼻炎患者的临床疗效、安全性、新进展及变应原特异性免疫疗法依从性的综述。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Feb 14;11:247-257. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S70411. eCollection 2017.
4
Immunotherapy in allergy and cellular tests: state of art.过敏与细胞检测中的免疫疗法:最新进展
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(6):1595-610. doi: 10.4161/hv.28592. Epub 2014 May 2.
5
Video Q&A: allergies and allergen immunotherapy--an interview with Alfred William Frankland.视频问答:过敏与变应原免疫治疗——访 Alfred William Frankland.
BMC Med. 2014 Jan 21;12:11. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-11.

本文引用的文献

1
The natural course of sensitization and allergic diseases from childhood to adulthood.从儿童期到成年期致敏和过敏性疾病的自然病程。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2013 Sep;24(6):549-55. doi: 10.1111/pai.12108. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
2
Efficacy and safety of the SQ-standardized grass allergy immunotherapy tablet in mono- and polysensitized subjects.标准化蒿花粉变应原免疫治疗片在单一致敏和多致敏患者中的疗效和安全性。
Allergy. 2013 Feb;68(2):252-5. doi: 10.1111/all.12074. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
3
Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA): achievements in 10 years and future needs.变应性鼻炎及其对哮喘的影响(ARIA):10 年成就与未来需求
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Nov;130(5):1049-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.053. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
4
Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy.变应原特异性免疫疗法的机制。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2012 Jan 5;2(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-2-2.
5
Viewpoint: the future of research in pediatric allergy: what should the focus be?观点:儿科过敏研究的未来:重点应该是什么?
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012 Feb;23(1):5-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01245.x.
6
Multiple-allergen and single-allergen immunotherapy strategies in polysensitized patients: looking at the published evidence.多过敏原和单过敏原免疫治疗策略在多敏患者中的应用:基于现有研究证据的探讨。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Apr;129(4):929-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.11.019. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
7
Sublingual allergen immunotherapy: mode of action and its relationship with the safety profile.舌下变应原免疫治疗:作用机制及其与安全性特征的关系。
Allergy. 2012 Mar;67(3):302-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02761.x. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
8
Analysis of allergen immunotherapy studies shows increased clinical efficacy in highly symptomatic patients.分析变应原免疫治疗研究显示,在症状高度明显的患者中临床疗效增加。
Allergy. 2012 Mar;67(3):321-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02759.x. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
9
Long-term clinical and immunological effects of allergen immunotherapy.变应原免疫治疗的长期临床和免疫学效应。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Dec;11(6):586-93. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32834cb994.
10
Sustained effects of grass pollen AIT.花粉免疫治疗的持续效果。
Allergy. 2011 Jul;66 Suppl 95:50-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02639.x.